Tamir Rice's Life Did Not Matter

Have you heard that the Smithsonian Museum (in cahoots with Black Lives Matter) wants to preserve the Cleveland gazebo where the 12-year-old thug-in-training Tamir Rice was fatally shot?

And the likelihood that they'd be doing this is if the person who pulled the trigger wasn't a white cop but instead, Ray Ray, Mookie, Slice, Puffy Boy, or Dre would be what exactly? Zero would be my guesstimate.

I say it was his mother's fault. For letting him play with a toy gun. We all know it was only a matter of time before he picked up a real gun. And used it to rob (and/or kill) a White man. Probably for the best that the cop put him down. And this fact (obviously) explains why the officer wasn't charged.

"The shooting of Tamir Rice was reasonable under the circumstances" was the conclusion of two reports. So, that a "wrongful" death claim was filed and settled for 6 million (SIX FUCKING MILLION) is a development I find OUTRAGEOUS! I bet Tamir's Taker family was able to set their grief aside pretty quickly. Given the fact that they are now millionaires. Money pilfered from White taxpayers - yet again!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of racism. LLIN-259.

On The Fact That Poor People (AKA Lucky Duckies) Are Not Paying Their Fair Share In Taxes

Yes, it is a fact that the bottom quintile gets 5.5 times as much in government benefits as they pay in taxes. This while the top quintile pays 3.5 times as much in taxes as they get back in government benefits.

So who's not paying their "fair share" again? Please, remind me. Clearly it's these lucky duckies. Not that I wish that I was poor and could loaf (sit on the couch eating cheetos and hot pockets, drinking Mountain Dew while watching "Game of Thrones" on my 4K big screen UHDTV). But I'm a Maker and not a lazy Taker.

But if you are poor and a lazy piece of shit (the two go hand in hand, btw, with the vast majority of poors being lazy fuckers who want to smoke weed and collect welfare)? Then, thanks to Liberals (who can only get elected by buying votes via free stuff paid for by over-taxing moderately well-to-do Makers like myself) then you surely are a "lucky ducky".

What explains this outrage? According to the Leftist publication "Mother Jones", many in the bottom quintile pay NO taxes!

...the federal tax code is designed not to tax the poor, the elderly, or low-income families with children, and there are more of these in America than you'd think. One way or another, it turns out, this accounts for about 40% of the country. (Breaking Down the Lucky Duckies).

Obviously SOME in the bottom quintile must pay taxes (while MANY don't). And, when you average it out, the result is that the bottom quintile gets 5.5 times as much in government benefits as they pay in taxes. Which I say is WRONG. If you're not paying in I say you should get NOTHING. As Ayn Rand put it, if these lazy loafers STILL refuse to work after their free stuff is removed, "nature will take it's course". And the poor loser will die.

Which I support 100% (that if lazy loafers refuse to work they SHOULD die. Good riddance, I say). And, NO, I don't give a shit if they're elderly or disabled. Or "can't work" for some other reason. No excuses, no exceptions. You don't work, you die.

Keeping these parasites alive at the expense of the rich man is an OUTRAGE! Frankly I think we need to abolish the victim class. Sadly, it will only come about via force (and by force I don't mean through violence but rather by changing our policies, allowing nature to take it's course, etc.) in that most folks are just too scared to be held responsible. And there's just way too much power and money at stake (government bureaucrats/programs, special interest groups, etc.) for a voluntary conclusion to occur. Hopefully it doesn't get too get ugly along the way.

By which I mean some kind of uprising. Get to work or die (if that is your choice). And, a poor man dying in the gutter isn't "ugly" at all. In fact I'd say it's poetic justice. By-the-way, if the poors were to rise up (after the elimination of their freebies), then I'd be OK with the State putting them to death. Looters should be shot (an instant death penalty that would be totally justified). As Mayor Daley said "shoot to kill".

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-258.

On The State Having The Gall To Enforce Laws After Passing Them (Laws The People Say They Want Via Democratic Elections)

The fact is that, whenever you go to bottom of the rabbit-hole with groups like Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, the Bernie Sanders crowd, etc, and ask these assholes how they're going to implement their agenda, they always have to confess that it will only be obtained through coercion, force, the threat of violence, and violence itself via the full force of the State.

I refer, of course, to the passage of laws after politicians who agree with them are democratically elected. HOW TERRIBLE!! I mean, if you're a oligarchy worshipping stooge like I am, you've seriously got to despise the fact that people can vote for representatives who might pass laws that could increase taxes on rich people. It's outrageous!

But relax, it's for our own good, they say. But is paying slightly more in taxes (so that ALL of the citizens of the United States do better) "good"? Some might say that when we all do better that is in the best interest of rich folks as well. And, if I was to be completely honest, I'd have to admit that these people are probably right.

On the other hand, stealing from wealthy Makers in order that we might all do better is a prospect I find highly offensive. Rich people can NEVER have enough money, IMO. And, if increasing the wealth of those who are already unbelievably wealthy necessitates the destruction of the Middle Class? Then I say it would absolutely be worth it.

Because if a rich person doesn't want to pay? He shouldn't have to. That's the bottom line here. Also, the State enforcing laws? Even more outrageous. At least when it comes to rich folks. Paying taxes is for poor people, IMO. Rich people shouldn't have to pay them. Unless (for some strange reason) they want to. I'm OK with the State asking "please", but not with the State using force. Obviously that's wrong (when it's a rich person. But not when it's a poor person).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-257.

As Plainly as I Can Say It... I'm A Gary Johnson Dupe

This commentary concerns my vote for president this November. Will I vote for Trump? I thought long and hard about it, but in the end I decided that Trump is a clown and I refuse to vote for clowns. If he wasn't a former reality show personality? Then, MAYBE I'd vote for him.

I really like his idea about building a wall. Not to keep out Hispanics willing to work for incredibly low wages. I'm 100 percent in favor of opening the borders to let in slave wage laborers (driving down wages for average Americans). But we do need to keep out terrorists who might try and sneak over the border (perhaps with a suitcase nuke).

So, that's a NO on Trump (unfortunately).

But you know who else I refuse to vote for? I refuse to vote for a person who lies to the families of the victims of the Benghazi attacks (telling them one thing when you told your own family something different) and who, when pressed on the matter, strongly implies that they're the ones who are lying.

Regardless of whether or not that actually happened. Which it did not. According to David Brooks (a man I admire because he's one of the very few commentators out there who holds both sides' feet to the fire) the search for something (anything) to indict Hillary on (in regards to Benghazi) failed because there was no scandal. In Brook's words the endless "investigation" of HRC over Benghazi resulted in NOTHING to slime Hillary with because it was a "big nothing burger".

David Brooks further said "there is a certain psychosis that goes through people's minds, especially about scandals, but Clinton scandals, where they — where something smells, and they think there must be something big, and they imagine there is about to be some big revelation that will destroy their careers".

Yeah, I think that just about sums it up for me. The psychosis that results in thinking there MUST be something big. That "something" being the "fact" that HRC "lied" to some of the families of those who lost loved ones in Benghazi. See also Lara Logan's debunked reporting regarding what Dylan Davies (a British employee of the security company Blue Mountain Group) said happened on the night of the Benghazi attacks.

According to Davies (as per his incident report) he "could not get anywhere near" the compound the night of the attack. Later he changed his story. In the revised version he "scaled a wall of the compound, personally struck a terrorist in the face with his rifle butt, and later went to the Benghazi hospital to see Ambassador Chris Stevens' body". Presumably he made himself a hero in this version in order to sell a book (a book that Simon & Schuster pulled when it discovered Davis was a liar).

Regardless of whether or not Davis is a liar (which he is), I continue to stick to my guns and insist that Lara Logan's reporting (reporting which she apologized for, saying "we made a mistake") PROVES that that IT'S NOT a "fake scandal" After All!!! And, yeah, I strongly suspect that Ms. Logan is going to get slimed over this one. Just because she said she made a mistake in putting a liar on the air?

Does it really matter that Davis lied? I say NO. What's important is the story that Logan initially reported. A story that makes the Obama administration and HRC look bad. Sorry, but I've got to part ways with the estimable David Brooks on this one. In this instance I think he took his penchant for holding people's feet to the fire regardless of party TO FAR. I mean, in this instance I think harming HRC's presidential chances is what is important. As opposed to getting the facts right.

For the record, when I said before that I'd vote for Hillary if someone held a gun to my head and told me I had to chose between her and Donald... and I said I'd vote for Hillary? What I forgot to add was (in that scenario), it was Hillary who was holding the gun to my head. If nobody was holding a gun to my head - and the choice was Hillary or Donald? I'd choose Donald. Despite him being a clown. And least he isn't a liar like Hillary (even though what I SAY she lied about is something she actually didn't lie about).

That's who and why I'm voting for Gary Johnson again. I'm totally in with his use of the buzzwords "liberty" and "freedom". Because he's referring to freedom and liberty for rich people. Mostly freedom from high taxes. Nevermind the fact that, belying the "liberty" facade, Gary has surrounded himself with a bevy of Rightwing opperatives.

Gary Johnson's campaign chief, Ron Nielson... runs a conservative polling firm called NSON Opinion Strategies, whose headquarters is the same three-story building on South Temple Road as Johnson's campaign headquarters... NSOM has a history of working with GOP right-wingers including crotchety Mormon asshole Orin Hatch and ex-witch and masturbation-denier Christine O'Donnell... Gary Johnson's campaign headquarters is located in Romney's backyard, in a right-wing Republican polling firm's office. [Also] according to documents filed with the state of Utah, the person responsible for filing the paperwork to register Gary Johnson's "Our America Initiative" is Maureen Otis, a Texas attorney with deep roots in the far-right Minutemen movement, and with Republican Party voter-suppression dirty tricks. (The Gary Johnson Swindle by Mark Ames. 11/6/2012).

The article goes on, but you get the idea. Gary Johnson being a "Libertarian" is (as per the article title) a swindle. Gary, despite his claims of wanting "liberty", associates himself with Rightwing operatives who are involved in voter suppression. Suppression that benefits Republican candidates.

Keep in mind that Gary (running as a Libertarian) has ZERO chance becoming president. So what's the game here? Help yourself by helping those who are cheating to get Republicans elected? Yeah, I think that's it.

Which I should note is A-OK by me. Will GOP dirty tricks help Donald Trump get elected? I think it's definitely possible that Republican voter suppression could hand the presidency to Gary Johnson Donald Trump. Sure, I'd be ecstatic if (somehow) voter suppression benefited Gary Johnson. Unfortunately that's not going to happen.

That being the case, I'm OK with Trump getting "elected" president. I'm not in love with the idea, but it is what it is. Better him than a piece of shit like HRC. Although (like I said) I'm voting for Johnson. Unless Hillary held a gun to my head. Then I'd vote for her. I'm only one vote and surely my one vote is NOT worth dying over. At least it isn't worth ME dying over. If Hillary held a gun to wd's head and said "vote for me or else" (I'll blow wd's head off)? I'd tell her to pull the trigger.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-256.

Is Paul Krugman Certifiably Insane?

Douch-bag "economist" Paul Krugman is a fucking gutless turd who isn't man enough to debate Robert Murphy. Yes, Paul Krugman criticized Murphy for predicting that the quantitative easing practiced by the Federal Reserve in the late 2000s would create double-digit inflation. And these predictions did not come to fruition. But so what?

And Murphy has expressed skepticism about evolution, asserting that he "can literally prove evolution is false". But, while I agree with Murphy that evolution is a totally bogus theory, he doesn't agree with my theory which is that life on earth was created in a lab by super-intelligent AI robots, who then seeded the galaxy.

Instead Murphy subscribes to a literal interpretation of the Bible. Because he's a Christian who believes in the imaginary Christian "God". Ridiculous? Yes. But not as ridiculous as Paul Krugman. This wack-job actually believes that the AI robots who created us (or other alien beings) are planning an invasion of earth that we need to prepare for! Maybe he got the idea from the 1996 sci-fi film Independance Day?

Who knows? We do know, however, that the insane Krugman thinks that the world should be building up its military in preparation for this coming alien invasion and that a side benefit of such a massive misallocation of resources would in fact pull the world out of recession. So it would be good, even if the invasion never materialized. Although Krugman is positive it will.

Could Krugman be suffering from some form of mental illness? I say the answer is a definite YES. Not only that, but I think Krugman's mental illness is quite severe, in that the dude is obviously delusional. He might suggesting that the Treasury mint a few of those trillion dollar coins to pay for the "needed" military buildup in order to repel the invading space aliens. What a nutjob, huh?

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-255.

Was FDR Our First Mentally Challenged President?

It's a totally true fact that the Democratic Party platform in 1932 advocated a 25% reduction in Federal expenditures AND FDR CAMPAIGNED ON THIS!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Roosevelt and his running-mate, John Nance Garner, essentially took turns lambasting Hoover for his deficit/wasteful spending, insane levels of taxation, destructive tariff policies, and even went as far as to say that Hoover was leading the country down the road to socialism. Talk about a bait and switch, huh (the fact that FDR did a total 180 and turned into Hoover on steroids and as a result the Depression lasted until 1945; WW2 only masking it)?

Yes it is also a fact* that FDR's socialistic programs prolonged the great depression by many years. According to what I've read, this idea "was popularized by Amity Shlaes book The Forgotten Man. ...but has been repeatedly debunked for using a set of employment figures the were inaccurate (they excluded millions of people with jobs)" (source).

The Forgotten Man, classified by Depression historian Robert S. McElvaine, as "born-again Antisocial Darwinism", argues that FDR was NOT a total dipshit. Historian Matthew Dallek, who has called Amity Shlaes a "revisionist" with a "blind view of the New Deal". Historian Eric Rauchway points out that Shlaes ignored historical GDP easily available in the Historical Statistics of the United States.

And, finally, journalist Jonathan Chait of The New Republic wrote, "intellectual coherence is not the purpose of Shlaes' project. The real point is to recreate the political mythology of the period". (Source: Wikipedia/The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression/Reception). Ouch! That's a blow to Libertarian the Libertarian historical revisionism I subscribe to.

Libertarian revisionism that says FDR made the Great Depression worse. A false narrative I'm totally down with, BTW. Not because it isn't complete BS (which it is), but because as a brainwashed stooge I believe what Libertarian luminaries tell me to believe. According to the Mises Institute the FDR administration was so incredibly stupid that their "solutions" included a "collection of crackpot policies".

BTW, when I say that FDR was "mentally challenged", I mean he was a retard ("mentally challenged" being the politically correct way of saying retarded). FDR, who, due to his polio, suffered from permanent paralysis from the waist down. Frankly I'm thinking the paralysis was from the waist UP and he couldn't walk because of brain paralysis. This brain polio explains the moronic ideas he came up with for combating the Great Depression.

*not a fact.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-254.

On The Fact That Most African Americans Simply Aren't Smart Enough To Be Lawyers (Not Good Ones, Anyway)

It is a fact that (based on the seminal Bar Passage Study of 1999 to 2004) a Black Student with a college GPA of 3.3 and an LSAT Score of 160 has a 200% better chance of passing the Bar on his or her first attempt if that student goes to Fordham Law School rather than Columbia, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cornell, Penn, Duke, or NYU Law School.

The reason is because Blacks are simply not as smart as Whites and need to go to a school that is more their "speed". I refer you to the poorly researched Taylor/Sander Book, "Mismatch" for a more in-depth analysis (the authors proving they have a high talent for inaccurate observation).

Mismatch happens when affirmative action students go to colleges where they are ill-prepared to compete and frequently either drop out completely or graduate and never pass the bar exam. Which is why racists such as myself strongly oppose sending dummy Blacks to schools that should only be attended by Whites (and, perhaps a SMALL percentage of Asians). Because Whites possess superior brains that can handle the rigors of completing the classwork at one of our more prestigious institutions of higher learning.

Can Blacks even be lawyers? Perhaps some can (subpar ones at best), but only if they attend "lesser" institutions; colleges that teach to the middle. As opposed to the TOP (a location populated almost exclusively by more intelligent White students). The fact of the matter is that when Blacks attend law school they mostly end up in the bottom 10% of their classes at Columbia and Penn, as opposed to being at the 50th percentile somewhere else (a school that is more their "speed", as I said earlier).

And, is it RIGHT that schools that should be exclusively White are being forced to accept less capable (brain-power wise) Blacks? I say NO. Thank you, White liberals.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-253.

On The Fact That Rational Nation, AKA Les Carpenter, AKA Lying Lester Is Now A Hardcore Progressive (One Of The Dimmer Ones)

Recently the former anarcho-capitalist Ayn Rand worshipping Libertarian blogger Rational Nation converted to hardcore Progressivism. I shit you not.

And they call Trump an idiot (not that I disagree with that of course). But come on! Although, now that I think of it, maybe Jersey McJones represented the REAL personality and political philosophy of Les Carpenter ALL ALONG and "Rational Nation USA" was (and is) the sock puppet? "Lying Lester" indeed.

In any case, he surely has been able to keep up the charade for a very long time. Unlike that dummy wd - who tripped up and outed his sock puppet (commented as himself while signed in with his conservative alter ego).

I gotta wonder, however, why Les decided to convert his "Rational Nation" sock puppet into a Progressive. Perhaps he thinks that other Libertarians will note his conversion, "see the light" and follow his lead?

Who knows? It didn't work with me. Although I heard that dmarks actually voted for that fucker Bernie Sanders in his state primary?! A development I find impossible to fathom. Maybe Les (or should I call him Jersey now) got to him (converted at least one Conservative to his way of thinking)?

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-252.

Is Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart Somebody's Sock Puppet?

Recently that idiot Leftist blogger, Ducky (I shit you not), alleged that I was a sock-puppet (of who he wasn't specific).

But I've been blogging for 9 YEARS now. I use my own damned name. What the fuck is this idiot talking about? I mean, are leftists really this stupid?

BTW, I'm not being specific as to where the hell Ducky supposedly said I was a sock puppet, but so what? Nobody reads this blog so why do I need to lay out the details? The bottom line here is that I know where it happened and I'm not telling you.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-251.

Octopus Is Decidedly NOT Amazing!

Contrary to what the former proprietor of this blog wrote, Octopus is absolutely NOT amazing! The fact is that Octopus is a mediocre, pseudo-professorial, cringe-inducing, self-important, pedantic, condescending, demagogic, cartoonishly partisan, race-hustling, thin-skinned, intolerant, straight out of central casting, and utterly buffoonish true-believing Leftist blogger.

To steal a phrase from Disraeli, the dude's "inebriated by the exuberance of his own verbosity". And can you even begin to imagine what it would be like sitting next to him on a long plane ride? Yikes, huh? I think I might hijack the plane and crash it into a mountain. Better yet, I think I'd definitely pass a note to the stewardess saying I suspected Octopus was a terrorist. Then he'd be removed from the plane.

By the way, I just noticed that the former proprietor of this blog, Lying Lester, put up a post on his RNUSA blog in which he said the asshole Octopus is "a person possessing by far superior intelligence, reasoning ability, and integrity" and that I, Willis Hart have a "rather stunted mind and character". To which I say "fuck you, Lying Lester". Emphasis on the "Lying".

Supposedly my commentary about Octopus is "projection". This from a blogger you used to be an anarcho-capitalist Libertarian who worshiped Ayn Rand and who thoroughly despised the progressive Left, but now essentially signs-off on every cockamamie Leftist notion under the damned sun from demonizing fossil fuels to playing the race-card to demagoguing on income inequality, class warfare, etc. This is exponentially far from normal behavior and, yes, when you throw in the whole Jersey McJones alter-ego, it's damned near psychotic!

The final straw for me was when that asshole Octopus called me a racist on RNUSA for correctly pointing out the fact that Blacks are incredibly violent. The demagogue said "racial profiling is the same as RACISM, and Will-the-Shill has demonstrated both".

And Lester, instead of defending his friend (at least I thought we were friends), agreed! He said "Comments such as ones addressed by Octopus in this comment thread do nothing to move the needed discussion forward and in fact works against improving dialogue on the issue".

This despite the fact that Lester previously acknowledged the fact that Blacks are also very lazy. So I *thought* he'd have my back! Instead the fucker stabs me in the back! That is when I left RNUSA for good. Because Black being stupid, lazy, violent drug users/pushers is just a fact, and me (in pointing this out) is in no way "racist".

For the record, the discussion in question concerned the murderer Dylann Roof. However (as I've also pointed out previously) incidents like this are anecdotal. By and large it's racist Blacks we need to be concerned about (racism and bigotry not just directed at White people, but at gays and Asians as well).

Sure, there are a few White racists, but not many. The real racists are largely Black. They want what Whitey has, but aren't willing to work for it. Instead they want to steal from the White man, either via actual theft, or via welfare programs (the Democrats being complicit in this theft being a fact that truly sickens me)!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-250.

Wild Black Animals Should Be Locked Up Forever (Or Perhaps Put To Death)

It is a fact (according to former prison psychologist, Marlin Newburn) the typical street-predator sees empathy as a weakness and brutality as something to be honored. I'd also add to these facts the fact that these street predators are usually Black males who spend their time not working but getting high and fathering dozens of kids from multiple mothers. That is when they aren't dealing drugs or committing other crimes (often victimizing innocent hard-working Whites).

And being that many psychologists will tell you tell you that personality disorders (with what I've described in the preceding paragraph obviously being one) are the most difficult forms of mental illness to ameliorate, that is probably why the recidivism rate is so staggeringly high. I mean, I get it that the Left is tied at the hip to the rehabilitation paradigm and all but maybe the best strategy for some of these folks (for their safety and for the community's) is just to keep them locked up, at least until they have a marketable skill, which will be never.

So maybe we should just put them to death? I'm just asking. Because, clearly we're dealing with human garbage here. And what do we do with garbage? Send it to a landfill and cover it over. Then the problem is TRULY taken care of. As opposed to locking the garbage up... then we've go to hire people to look after the garbage, which (in addition to being extremely expensive) can also be problematic (given how violent Black animals can be).

Yes, some of these rehabilitation programs pointed to by assholes on the Left actually work (Norway having one of the lowest recidivism rates in the world at 20%, whereas the US has one of the highest at 76.6%). But should the United States be taking any cues from Norway (or any other country)? I say fuck no. That's Bernie Sanders thinking.

BTW, I absolutely do not believe that the lifelong stigmatization of anyone with criminal record (placed on ex-offenders by our laws and society) has ANYTHING to do with them not being able to get a job. Or, even if it does, I surely do not give a shit. According to the bleeding hearts on the Left "gainful employment is a necessity for an ex-prisoner trying to get back on his or her feet; it helps prevent recidivism by providing legal income and giving a person a productive role in society".

To which I say... maybe. But once someone has made a mistake I say lock them up forever (or perhaps put them to death). What I'm saying is that there shouldn't be any 2nd chances. Sorry, but no. One strike and you're out, I say. As a White guy that's just not a chance I want to take when it comes to these violent Black criminals.

Seriously, even though I'm a Libertarian I honestly believe that some people (and I think we both know who these people are) don't deserve Constitutional rights. And these rights (Constitutional ones) should be stripped from these people so we can dispose of them as necessary. By locking them up forever, or even (possibly) by exterminating them.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-249.

On The Fact That (Because They Lack The Brainpower) Black Youths Would Rather Spend Their Time Mastering Violent Video Games, Fighting, Getting Wasted, Getting Knocked-up, Etc.

Did you know that some bleeding-hearts claim that if only there were more libraries in the inner-city (I actually saw a lady argue that on a Colin Flaherty Video) the crime-rate would go down.

Just as long as the libraries aren't made out of wood. Because, you know, Blacks riot and burn shit down. Because they're basically wild animals. During the slavery era they were at least domesticated animals.

PS... How would more libraries do any good given the fact that many of these dummy Blacks can't read? Now, according to the article "7 Lies We Need to Stop Telling About Young African-American Men", that "there are more African-American males in prison than college", that "African-American males believe academic achievement means they are acting white", that "less than 50% of African-American males graduate from high school", that "African-American male students have the same opportunities as their peers", that "African-American male students are underachievers", etc, are all "lies".

But I say these are truths. The author of the article, "Antwaun Sargent" (clearly a Black name) is a liar. Or he might just be dumb.

Blacks also have from 3 to 19% more of the sex hormone testosterone than Whites or Orientals. This means more explosive energy, which gives Blacks the edge in sports like boxing, basketball, football, and sprinting. "Why do East Asians and Whites and have wider hips than Blacks, and so make poorer runners?" The answer is that they give birth to larger brained babies. During evolution, as the head size of newborns increased, women had to have a wider pelvis. Orientals average 1 cubic inch more cranial capacity than Whites, and Whites average a very large 5 cubic inches more cranial capacity than Blacks. Proof that Blacks are so inferior to Whites in every way that they can barely be deemed to be of the same species as us. (Source).

This explains why more libraries would be a total waste. Blacks should train for manual labor jobs; and work them for a very low wage. The "minimum wage" being something we need to get rid of. It's racist to not acknowledge that we need to provide jobs for Blacks.

Most of them can't work jobs that require a medium to high intelligence (jobs that are done by mostly by Whites). Stupid fucking Liberals want them on welfare (because handing out freebies buys votes) when they could be doing low skill jobs for extremely low pay.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-248.

Memebers Of ISIS Are True Followers Of Muhammad, As Are All Muslims (They Should ALL Be Deported From This Country!)

It is a fact that I Left the Episcopalian church 35 Years ago and so far no one's come after me. 86% of Anglicans obviously not believing in death for apostasy. Thank God (pun intended, as this "god" fellow doesn't exist).

This is quite unlike what happens with that barbaric raghead religion known as "Islam". If anyone tries to leave it, that is. Barbaric because the complete and unabridged list of things that ISIS and al Qaeda have done that Muhammad wouldn't have consists of zero entries!

By which I mean that every single raghead who professes to be a follower of Islam is a terrorist (in my book and also in reality). Donald Trump, with his pause in importing more of these scumbags until we "figure out what's going on", doesn't go far enough. We need to deport them all. If no country will take them? I guess we've got no other choice but mass executions.

Give them notice first and see if they can arrange to emigrate elsewhere. I'm no barbarian, after all. But the fact remains... why should we allow those who hate us to live here? It's fucking insane.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of strawmen. LLIN-247.

Violent Black Animals Kill Cops Whose Lives Don't Matter (According To These BLM Assholes)

It is a fact that in prison the king of the yard is frequently a cop killer. This I know from first hand experience, having recently been sentenced to prison for "raping" some chick (who wanted it).

Anyway, why should the prison yard be any different than the street when it comes to these thugs? Murdering providing the ultimate in street-cred and, yes, when it's a cop that you're offing, watch out!!? Seriously?

BTW, I haven't reported for my sentence yet. The cop killer being the king of the yard is a fact I gleaned after interviewing some other guys who went to prison after being convicted of "rape" (AKA consensual sex after which the bitch changed her mind).

Don't worry, though, as I plan on keeping up both of my blogs. By smuggling out posts which my hired man Arnie Hanson will publish. Hopefully I won't be away for too long and my lawyer (who has already filed an appeal) will be able to get me out of this jam.

BTW, if one of these Black animals gets up in my grill? I might have to beat the shit out of him.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-246.

We Should Be Squeezing Blood From The Turnips! Lazy Mooching Poors Pay Way Too Little In Taxes!

The fact is that, even when you account for payroll, excise, and other taxes, the bottom quintile of American taxpayers only pay 1.8% of their income to the Feds (Source). Yeah, that asshole Bernie tends to gloss over this fact (if in fact he even knows about it). Big surprise, huh?

BTW, don't look at that link I provided above, because if you do, you'll read some facts that don't jibe with my narrative. Which is that some taxpayers have it easy (freeloaders mooching off the system), while others (the Makers) unfairly pay most of the taxes (they are the hosts to the parasitical leeches in the bottom quintile).

Inconvenient to my narrative would be the fact that "the payroll tax is regressive (the effective rate falls as income rises): it claimed an average of 8.2 percent of income from tax units in the lowest quintile but only 6.8 percent from the top quintile; for the top 1 percent, the tax averaged just 0.9 percent of income".

And the Tax Policy Center (the source I initially cited) also notes that "a key insight from economics is that taxes are not always borne by the individual or business that writes the check to the IRS. Sometimes taxes are shifted. For example, most economists believe that the employer portion of payroll taxes translate into lower wages and are thus ultimately borne by workers".

SUPER inconvenient to my Libertarian narrative would be that "there is not a consensus, however, on the economic incidence of other taxes, such as the corporate income tax". Inconvenient because I'm for the elimination of all corporate taxes, because such taxes are passed along to the consumer! Or so the brain dead Libertarian talking point goes. As you can see the TPC says "wait a minute" in regards to that one!

Then there is also the fact that "in 2011, households in the top, middle, and bottom quintiles received 52, 14, and 5 percent of the nation's before-tax income, respectively". So, the bottom quintile is only paying 1.8%, but they are only making 5% of all the income that's earned.

Regardless, I say that (if taxes are to be paid AT ALL, and I'm of the opinion that all taxation is theft) we should squeeze these turnips until they bleed. Tax them til they squeal. Because if someone has to pay (for the government to function), then I say it should be the worthless Takers. As opposed to the worthy Makers.

Let the rich man keep what he's earned. Time for the free ride the poor leeches have been enjoying for so long (at the rich man's expense) to end! Ayn Rand would absolutely agree.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-245.

Feminazis Need To Accept The Fact That Men R Superior & Halt Their Persecution Agenda!

My thoughts on nature and equality are that the former never got the memo about the latter and it is highly doubtful that it ever will (nonstop social-engineering notwithstanding). Obviously men are biologically superior to women, explaining why they are in charge and make more money.

Radical Marxist feminists (AKA feminazis), via their nonstop social-engineering, think they can change this reality. Their agenda being a flipping of the script. Something they have been successful at to a frightening degree. Which explains why in today's society men are the sex being persecuted and oppressed!

The feminazis' tactics include falsely accusing men of rape, falsely accusing men who they've had sex with of fathering their bastard kids (when they likely got inseminated by some lesbo using an infant medicine syringe and the sperm of some gay dude - resulting in the indentured servitude of innocent men), and whining about a "patriarchy" that doesn't exist!

P.S. And, no, I don't live in Europe or CanaDUH so you can't arrest me. Sorry.

Image: Picture I found that does a good job of relating the facts regarding the many ways in which a man's brain is superior to a woman's. Excellent graphic, with the exception of crediting an imaginary "God".

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-244.

If I Were A Serial Killer? My Victims Would Be Leftist Buffoons!

On TV programs or movies when the bad guy is a serial killer, the victims are usually prostitutes. If I were a serial killer, however? My victims would be Leftist buffoons. Not that I am even thinking of becoming a serial killer. I'm not. But if I were? The following people would DEFINITELY be on my kill list...

Stephen Colbert (a Leftist media buffoon who should quit so a woman can have his job), Barney Frank (a clueless crony-capitalist), Melissa Harris-Perry (a pseudo-intellectual, insular, pretentious, and virulent Leftist buffoon), Paul Krugman (a Leftist economist buffoon who laughably suggests an alien invasion would be beneficial), Chris Matthews (a hard-core partisan fool), John Oliver (a Leftist media buffoon who criticizes Donald Trump but not Hillary Clinton), Franklin Delano Roosevelt (a loathsome buffoon who I'd like to time travel to murder), as well as Comrade Bernie Sanders (not just a socialist but a dumb one).

If I could only chose one of the above to rape and murder? My first choice would be FDR (a truly evil man). But to kill him I'd need a time machine. But, since time machines don't exist, I'll go with Paul Krugman. Seriously, can you believe this fucking imbecile won a Nobel prize for economics?!! Yeah, hard to believe it wasn't for buffoonery! That's the one I'd have awarded him, as he SURELY deserves it.

Byline: This list was compiled by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of compiling lists of buffoons I'd like to brutally murder. LLIN-243.

Radical Marxist Feminists Whining About "Patriarchy" Piss Me Off!

American women didn't have the right to vote til 1919. Yeah, that was bad. But you know what else was? Try the fact that men got drafted and served up as disposable fodder for a bunch of moronic wars (the Mexican-American War, the Civil War, the Spanish-American War, the Philippine War, and WW1). I mean, you can't cast a ballot when you're dead, right?

Further proof that this "patriarchy" nonsense is just that. Total BS being peddled by the Marxist feminists (who I hate). Men going to war and dying while women got the easy job of keeping up the household and raising the kids (while the man pays the bills)? It makes me want to puke. How easy women have had it, that is.

These ungrateful bitches should be thanking men for allowing them to take advantage of them for so long. But women taking advantage of men is the norm, being the weaker sex. Or lazier sex (more like it). Patriarchy is supposedly "a social system in which males hold primary power, predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege and control of property".

I say "patriarchy" is, however, a system where the women have tricked the men into doing most of the work while they take it easy (shopping, eating bon-bons while relaxing, etc). And then, when the men (rightly) demand payment for their work, these bitches falsely accuse the men of rape! How pathetic are women?

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-242.

Message To Hillary Clinton: I Hate Your Mother-F*cking Corrupt Pandering Pantsuit-Wearing Guts!

Does Hillary Clinton read this blog? I doubt it. If she does, however, I'd like to take this opportunity to let her know that I hate her mother-fucking corrupt pandering pantsuit-wearing POS lawyer guts with the intensity of an octillion hydrogen bombs detonating after being fired into the sun!

Frankly, I doubt I've ever felt this intensely regarding any human being who has ever lived, except for Bernie Sanders. Which means that I hate Hillary almost as much as I hate Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt, the two wickedest and most power-mad individuals to ever hold the office of POTUS/CIC.

The problem with crooked Hillary is that the evidence shows she could be just as evil, IMO. I mean, the bitch accepts Saudi money via her "Global Initiative" slush fund (all the while never uttering a peep about how that country treats its women like shit)! And she's determined to win the presidency no matter how many lies she needs to tell. Which explains why she's gotten into a contest with Bernie Sanders regarding who can give away the most free stuff!

Because the bitch Hillary Clinton is a lying piece of shit lawyer who is about to be indicted, perhaps, just maybe, the Democrats need to look elsewhere for a candidate? Perhaps they can beg and plead with the studly Jim Webb to accept the nomination?

Yes, Miss Hillary claimed that Colin Powell also had a private email server when he was secretary of state and so she said "what's the big deal"? But this is utter bullshit. The fact of the matter is that NO previous Secretary of State has ever had a private email server running in their home from which they sent and received ALL of their correspondence while in office. The good news for her is that she (arguably) has plausible deniability as to whether or not she knew that the emails were classified. The bad news is the fact that if she asserts this as a defense she looks like a total incompetent and an utter moron.

Then there is also the fact that Hillary Clinton told her family and the President of Egypt that the Benghazi attack was an organized terrorist operation that had absolutely nothing to do with a video and then told the American citizens just the opposite. If that isn't proof-positive that the chick's a fucking liar then nothing is. And she also told this lie to the families of the four victims the same BS story, and that that the government was going to go after the fellow who made some Youtube video! Now she's implying that the families are aLL Lying (this Despite the Fact that the father of Ty Woods Has an in-time journal entry which substantiates his version of the story). SHAME!

But back to Hillary being evil. Do you think she made a deal with Satan to secure the Democrat nomination? I don't, given the fact that Satan is imaginary. But if he were real? Yeah, then I definitely think the shrill, shriveled up old hag would have sold her soul in order to become the leader of the free world. Fuck her!

Perhaps some day a woman might run for the White House who would make a good president. Maybe. Although, perhaps not, given the fact that A) chicks have babies and when raising those babies miss out on life experiences (which explains why any given man, by and large, will be more qualified), and B) women lie constantly (about things such as rape). Hillary herself has lied (and continues to lie) about the rapes committed by her husband.

My point is that the woman president we're waiting for is NOT HRC! Also, should we really have being a woman be one of the factors we use in selecting the leader of the free world? As opposed to choosing the person best qualified for the job (regardless of sex)? So that person will likely ALWAYS be a man. But that isn't sexist. Although the last time out the electorate chose a man, but they chose him just because he was Black! What's next pRogressives? Some transgender for president?

Byline: This outraged commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-241.

On The Fact That The White Race Is Superior

There exists no reason WHATSOEVER to believe that the primary ancestors of the Egyptian population emerged and evolved outside of northern Africa. Proof being the fact that dental samples have especially shown a biological constancy over the millennia. The Egyptian culture itself has essentially remained intact.

Yet there still remain these Afrocentric buffoons out there who are desperately trying to secure credit for the accomplishments of ancient Egypt? The sooner that black people relinquish these farcical and discredited myths (another ridiculous one is the assertion that sub-Saharan blacks came to America 40,000 years before the Native-Americans arrived via the Asian land-bridge) and accept the fact that the Africoon race is subpar, the sooner that they can get on to more important items; improving their human capital, strengthening the family structure, education reform, etc.

This they can do by rejecting the free goodies being offered by the Democrat Party and by voting Conservative. Preferably Libertarian. But voting Republican would be a step in the right direction. That direction being an escape from the Democrat plantation. Unfortunately I suspect most of them most of them lack the brainpower. I say this because science has proven that Blacks are less intelligent than Whites.

Sure, there are some ACTUAL black heroes (Jackie Robinson, Rosa Parks, Harriet Tubman, Frederick Douglass, Booker T. Washington, Ed Brooke, Thomas Sowell). Must be freaks of nature. That, or they got lucky (one of their ancestors was raped by a White man and they got enough White DNA to overcome the bad Black dummy genes).

But the dummy Blacks (most of them) are so insecure that they can't help but pedal (or buy) these stupid "we wuz kings" narratives. Pathetic. Also pathetic? The so-called Black Lives Matter movement. If Blacks weren't so violent (in addition to being dumb) cops wouldn't have to shoot them.

BTW, remember I mentioned improving their human capital is what they should focus on? If they did that they could get some halfway decent jobs working for White bosses for low (but steady) wages. As opposed to ending up in prison for dealing drugs (the males. Many of them named Mookie, Ray-Ray, Dre or Slice). Or subsiding on government handouts (which they get more of) based on how many kids they can pop out (the females).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-240.

On The Fact That Men Need To Step Up Their Game In Domestic Violence Situations

According to researchers such as Erin Pizzey and Warren Farrell, male victims of domestic abuse are more likely to get arrested themselves than they are to be helped by the system. The reason for this, obviously, is because the police can't believe that a man would be such a pussy as to be "abused" by a woman.

They either assume the man is the abuser, or they laugh their asses off when the man says his woman hit him and that he needs help. Obviously in such situations the man should beat the crap out of his woman. In order to teach her a lesson and make sure she never dares to raise her hand to her man again. These radical Marxist feminists need to learn that their place is in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant. Patriarchy, patriarchy, where for art thou, patriarchy?

On the other hand, the Department of Justice finds that women make up 84% of spouse abuse victims. The DOJ also found that 84% of spousal murder victims are female, and women in general are more likely to be killed by their spouses than all other types of assailants combined.

So the patriarchy isn't doing that bad. Still, that doesn't mean that men don't need to step up their game. Bitches need to know their place, and that these stats are not all 100% is obviously troubling.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-239.

Will Our Next President Be Gary Johnson?

So, here we are, actually on the verge of having to watch two of the most low-ball jamming and distrusted politicians in the country (Clinton and Trump) defecate on each other for the next five months in what is bound to be one of the most rancid presidential races in U.S. history?!

More and more I'm beginning to think that this existence thing of ours isn't actual but rather some virtual reality, hologram, dream, or video game. 'Cause I ask you here, what sane and cogent civilization would act like this? IT MAKES NO SENSE. Maybe we're participants in a game being played by the super-intelligent AI robots?

And, yes, I'm begging you, at least consider throwing away your vote on Gary Johnson, whose honesty, integrity, competence, sanity, and dedication to our beloved oligarchs we cannot question (at least not to this ludicrous level).

So, while I previously said that Johnson would probably have to kill somebody for me to not vote for him again, now I'm thinking that I'd vote for Johnson even if he out and out murdered someone. Heck, I'd still vote for Johnson even if we were to find out that he was a serial killer who pranced about in the nude wearing nothing but his victim's skin (in the privacy of his own home).

One thing I would not do, however, would be to write in the name "Les Carpenter" (AKA Lester Nation, the former proprietor of this blog). That guy is an asshole.

BTW, if Donald Trump were to be wise enough to select Gary Johnson as his VP, I'd vote for Donald in a heartbeat. Although I think Gary might say no if Donald asked him. However, IMO, Donald Trump might not be that bad. Also, at the end of Trump's 8 years in office Gary could run and win as POTUS (given the fact that a VP going on to become president isn't unprecedented).

On the other hand, the nation might just decide that neither Trump nor Clinton are fit for the presidency and decide to send Gary Johnson (a high-ball jammer) to the White House! Causing me (as well as others who worship the plutocrats) to jump for joy! Unfortunately, that seems unlikely, what with Miss Clinton going after the Bernie voters by offering to give away boatloads of other people's money. Not quite as much as Comrade Sanders wanted to give away, but still a LOT.

So, will Gary Johnson be our next president? Maybe not. A factor that might help Gary clinch the presidency could be the selection of the right person as his VP. Now, the former proprietor of this blog often suggested that he might be a good VP pick for Johnson. But given the fact that he went from being an anarcho-capitalist Libertarian who worshiped Ayn Rand and who thoroughly despised the Progressive Left to somebody who essentially signs off on every cockamamie Leftist notion under the damned sun? I'm thinking that I would be a MUCH better choice.

Surely Gary Johnson is smart enough to select Willis Hart as his VP. I mean, I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Gary reads this blog and takes pointers from it. And, a Johnson-Hart ticket would almost be a shoe-in, I think. Except for the fact that the voters are quite dumb. I mean, Bernie Sanders almost defeated Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination, and he's a Socialist for Christ!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-238.

Message To Bernie Sanders: I Hate Your Mother-Fucking Socialist Guts!

Does Bernie Sanders read this blog? I doubt it. If he does, however, I'd like to take this opportunity to let him know that I hate his mother-fucking Socialist guts with the intensity of the sun going supernova, expanding and engulfing our planet, burning the universe and vaporizing the earth!! (an explosion that would be roughly the equivalent of a few octillion nuclear warheads going off).

Frankly, I doubt I've ever felt this intensely regarding any human being who has ever lived. Which means that I hate Bernie more than I hate Abraham Lincoln, the most evil man who ever lived (right up there with Stalin and Mao).

The problem with Sanders isn't that he's evil (which he is) but that he's incredibly stupid. He's so stupid that he belongs in a group home for the mentally impaired. A place where the minders need to wipe the drool from the chins of the mouth-breathers.

My hatred for Sanders is also significantly stronger than any love I've ever felt for any human being as well. Although, as a Libertarian I can honestly say that there has never been anyone I've felt has earned my love, so that's a low bar that really isn't worth mentioning.

Yes, regarding Sanders I previously said "the American Eagle needs BOTH of its wings to fly", but I've changed my mind bigley on this. I still believe that the eagle needs two wings, but now I'm more convinced than ever that Sanders is simply too far Left. The dude is a fucking Socialist, for christ!

Now? I'm thinking that one of the eagle wings should be Right-wing and the other should be centrist. Honestly, I don't know what the fuck was going through my mind when I wrote that, given the fact that only the dumbest people on the plant subscribe to Socialist idiocy.

Which is why the idea of Bernie Sanders as president scares me shitless. Because he'd likely start rounding up the rich folks who voice (justified) anger regarding his massive tax hikes. And shoot a few of them in the head to make examples of them.

If I'm completely honest, I think that if Sanders were elected president, I'd seriously consider moving out of the country. Because Sanders (according to his own rhetoric) would do his damndest to utterly destroy our democratic republic. And for that, yes, I absolutely hate his fucking guts. The asshole should have defected to the USSR when he traveled there for his honeymoon!

Byline: This outraged commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-237.

I'm With Trump In His Desire To Restrict Raghead Access To Our Country

Did you know it's a fact that only 33% of Ragheads living in Britian would turn in a terrorist to authorities (Source)? Obviously the solution is to not to allow in hundreds of thousands more of 'em? Apparently (even Angela Merkel has conceded that multiculturalism has totally failed).

Keep 'em out, I say. As for Trump, he says we need to keep them out, but only until we can "figure out what's going on". But we know what's going on! Islam is backward and incompatible with the values of the West. I say we should not only ban more of them from entering the United States, but kick out many that are already here (67% maybe?).

Perhaps we should start rounding them up and putting them in camps (the ones who would NOT turn in a terrorist to the authorities). Although that's not going to happen under Obama. Hopefully, after Trump is elected and figures out what's going on (they hate us)... then we can start deporting them? Trump did say that his administration would look at that and many other things. One of the "many other things" SHOULD be deporting Muslims as far as I'm concerned.

Fucking dirty flea-infested raghead terrorists. And the ones who aren't terrorists are terrorist lovers! As the study I linked to shows. Make America great again by kicking them out. I mean, here in the US we're the champion of diversity, inclusion, and tolerance, except when it comes to Ragheads. Which is why it's a very bad idea to allow the mass immigration of folks from cultures in which these very concepts are totally abhorred.

This is "logic" that an average 8th grader would have been able to dismantle when I was a kid but which today is quite literally parlayed around ad nauseam by 35 year-old insular feminists as a form of spiritual and ethical enlightenment. Boy, has the West ever gotten stupid. And, by "West" I mean Progressives.

Those fuckers are determined to destroy America. I wish we could deport them. Comrade Bernie Sanders would be a good place to start, IMO. Send him back to the country where he honeymooned (the USSR). Why didn't he apply for asylum when he was there? As opposed to coming back here and attempting to make the US more like Soviet Russia.

So, even though I'm voting for Gary Johnson? Bring on the Trump presidency, I say.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-236.

76 Bitches Be Lying About Getting "Raped"

It's a fact that, according to feminists it doesn't matter how many times that a woman says, "yes, yes, more, more", tirelessly pursues her supposed abuser (substantiated by a "paper trail"), or even lies her ass off about the event, the "victim" must never be doubted or even questioned as consent can be withdrawn whenever a woman Wants, even AFTER a consensual act has taken place.

Specifically I'm referring to Canada feminists who've been critical of the Ghomeshi verdict. This was a case where Canadian radio host Jian Ghomeshi was (in late 2014) arrested and charged with four counts of sexual assault, and one count of overcoming resistance by choking, in relation to three complainants. Although 16 people actually accused him (including one man who said Ghomeshi grabbed his nuts).

Kinda reminds me of all the women who are lying about (my hero) Bill Cosby "raping" them. Bill Cosby is a successful Black man who realizes Blacks are to blame for their own poor predicaments and not "racism". Mr. Cosby tried to administer some tough love to the black community just a few years ago. They responded by calling him an Uncle Tom and senile. Yes Houston, we definitely have a problem.

The current Cosby problem is that 60 women have accused him of "rape". And, according to the feminist bitch lawyer Gloria Allred, "I can assure Mr. Cosby that there are still more victims who will be courageous enough to come forward in the future".

"Victims"? While it's easy for me to believe that 60 (maybe it's more by now) women could all be lying, I also have to confess here that when that legendary publicity-monger, Janice Dickinson (maybe the ugliest and stupidest supermodel ever), jumped into the fray and claimed that she, too, was raped by Mr. Cosby, a LOT of doubt creeped in. Now, I'm thinking this could definitely be a bum's rush. And yes, I said "possibly" before, but cases like Ghomeshi (16 lying accusers) caused me to rethink my previous comments.

BTW, that "paper trail" consists of one "complainant who had previously testified to having no contact with Ghomeshi after the alleged assaults [but who was then] confronted with two emails she had written to Ghomeshi more than a year afterwards, one included a picture of her in bikini [which] she described... as bait to get him to explain why he attacked her". Sure.

There is, however, the fact that Ghomeshi's own employer [CBC] investigated and issued a report that stated he "consistently breached the behavioural standard... of CBC by yelling at, belittling and humiliating others [and engaged in] "sexualized conduct and comments... in the workplace". But the "investigation was led by Janice Rubin, a prominent lawyer and leading authority on workplace harassment". So, another lying bitch, in other words?

Now Cosby is apparently going to trial? I sure hope he catches a break (like Ghomeshi) and the witnesses against him screw up and the charges are thrown out. Because bitches ganging up to attack innocent men has become an epidemic, IMO. Hopefully the patriarchy will display a backbone for once and put a screaming halt to this bullshit (and, yes, by bullshit I'm referring to hard-core indoctrination in which radical Marxist feminist orthodoxy is the unquestioned cynosure).

Men need to lay down the law because women's demands (to not be raped) are really getting out of hand, IMO. Fucking lying sluts.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of defending rapers who are falsely accused. LLIN-235.

President Jimmy Carter Did The Right Thing And Lowered Taxes On Rich Makers (Unfortunately The Post-Presidency Carter Is A Piece Of Shit)

Did you know that Jimmy Carter signed into law (after initially opposing it) the the Steiger Amendment; a piece of legislation that reduced the top capital gains tax rate by nearly 44% (from over 49% to 28%)? Yeah, I'll commend Carter for coming around and realizing that greedily seizing the wealth of the Makers WHO EARNED IT (in order to redistribute it to worthless takers al la Comrade Sanders) wasn't the way to go. More evidence that Carter was a moderate to conservative Democrat.

Carter's views were much more in sync with JFK and Al Smith than they were progressive buffoons such as FDR, McGovern, Sanders, etc. And, yes, I've ultimately concluded that Carter was an underrated President (the fact that the guy cut taxes, deregulated various sectors of the economy, brokered a peace between Egypt and Israel, appointed Paul Volcker as Fed Chairman, kept spending relatively low, worked well with the Republicans, etc.) whose failure was at least to some degree the function of dumb luck. Plus he was an honest fellow. Gotta give him some cred for that as well.

Why this defense of Carter, when the Rightwing bashes him TO THIS DAY (with comparisons to Barack Obama)? It's because the Libertarian Mises Institute said I should "rethink Carter". I used to refer to myself as a "small L libertarian", but that's no longer the case. Now I eagerly scarf down any and all Libertarian bullshit I can get my hands on. If a Libertarian author, thinker, fellow, think tank or institute said it, I believe it unquestioningly.

But back to Carter... unfortunately this douche-bag's antics post presidency make me want to retract that cred. I mean, did you hear he said America is an oligarchy? That would be my biggest criticism of him. I mean, if America were an oligarchy that would be, IMO, fucking awesome. Then we could get to eliminating the welfare state. Instead of growing it like both Hillary and Bernie are promising (although Hillary may be lying. Or I hope she is, at least).

Although she's going to be indicted soon, which will almost certainly cause her to lose to Donald Trump. And yeah, I might have been able to get behind Trump, except for him saying he's going to "renegotiate" our trade deals. Because they result in American workers getting screwed. Which is why I say fuck him. Screwing American workers to further enrich the oligarchs is what Adam Smith advocated for.

Although Trump might be lying about that too. He surely is a hypocrite on the matter, what with all his "Trump" products being manufactured outside the US. Although (don't get me wrong), as (if he is a hypocrite on this matter) I applaud him for his hypocrisy.

Carter also insulted the Tea Party movement. According to POTUS #39 Tea Party patriots are "racist". Then Carter said "I think there has been a degeneration in this country in absolute equality for black and white people"... which is complete horse shit. Especially considering most of the racism that remains is Blacks thinking White men are the Devil.

And, get this... Carter said he's "saddened by the events in Ferguson MO". And he wasn't referring to all the violent Africoon animals looting and torching businesses (all based on the "hands up, don't shoot" lie). So, yeah, the post-presidency Carter really makes me want to puke. What a piece of shit he degenerated into. Similar to the recent degeneration of the Democrat party. Shameful.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of devouring Libertarian bullshit. LLIN-234.

On The Fact The Evolution Is Phony Baloney

The odds of a chimpanzee randomly typing out the word "evolution"? For the sake of simplicity, let's leave out the numbers and punctuation marks. Even after that, the odds are still astronomical; 26 to the 9th power to 1, or 5,429,571,278,976 to 1. And yet this is in essence what the advocates of evolution are asking us to believe, MULTIPLIED BY INFINITY.

Look, I'm not saying that the Bible-thumping creationists are correct, either (with many of them in fact being certifiable), just that maybe we still don't know, that's all. Personally, I think life on earth was created in a lab by super-intelligent AI robots, who then seeded the galaxy. But, hey, I could be wrong.

Anyway, Bible-thumpers are usually Conservative, as I am. So at least they're right on that front. I'm talking about the belief that, if you're a Maker, you should be able to keep 100 percent of YOUR money. By which I mean taxes should be zero. Because they're evil. I mean, the Christian Bible says "thou shalt not steal from the Makers", right? Or some variation. Something "God" and the AI robots that created us are SURELY in agreement on.

That thievery from the Makers is a sin. Stealing from poor people, however? It doesn't count. Because what we're really talking about is exploiting. And a rich man exploiting a poor man to further enrich himself is just the way the world works. Because it's the way it's SUPPOSED to work. Read Ayn Rand if you don't believe me. Social justice warriors are worse than Nazis. And are going to end up in "hell" for their sins (if such a place exists).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-233.