Thursday, January 15, 2015

Lying Lester Discusses Blundering Obama's Big Blunder

On Sunday, leaders representing Europe, Israel, Africa, Russia, and the Middle East linked arms and marched together down Place de la Concorde in Paris. Unfortunately and most conspicuously our own pResident chose not to attend.

The decision by the pResident of the United States of America to not be present, or at the very least send his Vie President, has been most troubling. Obama may have had his reasons but in politics and governance perception can be everything.

Certainly the perceptions of many, if not most on this important issue is not a positive one. The White House belatedly recognizing the error in judgment has acknowledged the mistake while at the same time spinning to put the best face possible on the snafu.

On this issue LLIN finds itself behind Senator Ted Cruz. At issue is the growth of, and the threat radicalized extremist Islam present the civilized world.

President Obama should have been there. Our president ought to have known this instinctively. It is of course now water under the bridge. Mistakes happen. This one never should have.

But, back to Senator Cruz, a potential 2016 presidential candidate who wrote the following in a TIME magazine op-ed...

Ted Cruz: The absence is symbolic of the lack of American leadership on the world stage, and it is dangerous. ... Many of our allies gathered together in Paris yesterday in an admirable display of determination. Our President should have been there (Link).

Dangerous! Dangerous that the feckless leading-from-behind Obama was not in attendance. That is Cruz's opinion, and the opinion of Lying Lester as well. Perhaps oBama did not attend due to his being a stereotypical lazy Black man?

But in regards to the danger... the danger is that the sub human terrorist killers see weakness in oBama's actions. Or even agreement with their goals. Given the fact that some believe oBama may be a sleeper mUslim terrorist who ran to bring down America from within. Not that Lying Lester agrees with this assessment. Although, as Senator Cruz points out "the failure of Obama to lead the free world in this way encourages radical Islamic terrorists" (source).

So, while oBama may not be a mUslim himself (or at least a radical one), he ENCOURAGES the radical Islamic terrorists (though his action... or inaction). Gee, Lying Lester has to wonder if bArack hUssein oBama has a flea or two? He might, if he's too lazy to take a shower.

Byline: This insightful commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of untruth. LLIN-156.

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Not All mUslims Are Sub Human Animals. Just Almost All Of Them

Lying Lester knows first had up close and lersonal that all Muslims are not sub human animals. Only MOST of them are. The ones that are flea and lice infested. And extremist.

By "extremist", I mean those mUslims who consider muhammad to be a prophet. mUslims that do not consider muhammad to be a prophet are A-OK in Lying Lester's book, and are NOT sub human animals. mUslims such as my (imaginary) mUslim friends. These (imaginary) friends consider themselves mUslims but agree with Lying Lester that, instead of saying "peace be upon him", we should be saying "piss be upon him" when referring to muhammad.

As for these 21st century Islamic extremists who follow muhammad, their acts of barbarity continue to grow throughout the world. So, what's it ti be? Tolerance and understanding for the religion if "peace" or condemnation followed by swift and decisive justice? It seems impossible to have it both ways with these sub human animals.

But should we try? Lying Lester says NO! Lying Lester says we should slaughter them all! The right of free speech critical of government and religion absolutely must be advocated, supported, and if necessary fought for by all who desire to be free to experience the joy of liberty.

Having said this it does seem that intentionally provocative and negative press presumably for the sole purpose of goading a particular group may not be all that sensible. Especially given the particular in question long track record of violent response. Just a thought.

A thought Lying Lester rejects. Moving to the governments of the free world; they must be collaborating, planning, plotting, and ultimately setting in motions concrete actions that will help the Muslim nations of the world neutralize or eradicate the threat radicalized extreme Islam presents to the world.

The sooner these mUslim nations reject muhammad the better. And start bathing regularly as well. If they did this (reject muhammad and bathe), then Lying Lester would agree to spare they should be spared from the slaughter.

It's going to be a long treacherous road and there is no guarantee reason and rational thought concerning rejecting muhammad and bathing will ultimately win. One thing is certain though; if the West allows itself to be driven by the actions of these extremists into becoming like them they will have won.

What I mean by us becoming like them is our not abandoning our religion. The United States is primarily a cHristian nation, although atheists such as myself have been increasing in number. The Pew Research Center says "the number of people who identify themselves as atheists in the United States has been rising, modestly but steadily, in recent years [and] data from 2012 show that 2.4% of American adults say they are atheists when asked about their religious identity, up from 1.6% in 2007".

So the trend is in the right direction, but still... only 2.4 percent of Americans are rational enough to not worship an imaginary sky god?! But I digress... what I was talking about was the sub humanness of mUslim extremists. The most recent example being the attack on the staff of the satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo.

The magazine published some cartoons making fun of muhammad (piss be upon him). Well, if these mUslims took Lying Lester's advice and recognized that muhammad was a horrible person who should not be acknowledged as a prophet... well, then there would be no problem.

That problem being the fact that muhammad (piss be upon him), was a sub human animal, very much like the perpetrators of the Charlie Hebdo attack. Those who pay reverence to a sub human "prophet" does not say much for the adherents of Islam, in my opinion.

Lying Lester's advice to sane mUslims around the world is to cast muhammad aside. Like my (imaginary) mUslim friends have. Remember that Lying Lesters knows first had up close and lersonal that this is the only way to avoid being a sub human animal.

Byline: This excellent commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of BS concerning Muslims who reject the prophethood of muhammad. LLIN-155.