On Why I'm A Climate Change Skeptic

It is a fact that A) the earth's climate Is a chaotic system and B) because of that any attempt at predicting the weather hundreds of years into the future is a fool's errand on steroids.

And yet our fascistic and moronic politicians continue to think otherwise, spout ridiculous claims (that 97% of scientists agree with their views, that CO2 is the primary driver of temperature, that we already possess the technology to significantly decarbonize, etc.), and proclaim that they can control the climate through such idiotic initiatives as cap and trade, a carbon tax, green energy boondoggles, etc. How utterly embarrassing.

Although some might say that the embarrassment should be felt by deniers such as myself. If I were to be completely honest, I'd have to admit that deniers like me are huge liars and totally full of shit. For example, I pulled the typical denier fast one by conflating weather and climate. Then I lied about the fact that 97% of climate scientists agree that human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures.

As for decarbonizing, certainly there is technology that currently exists that could make some significant progress toward this goal. The purpose of referring to green energy projects as a "boondoggles" is to STOP further progress toward decarbonization. Personally, I'm a big fan of dirty fossil fuels. They are there, and it would be foolish of our plutocrats to leave big profits on the table.

What's more important, folks; saving our planet or further enriching our beloved oligarchs? Obviously, as a Conservative, I'm for the latter and NOT the former. Actually, if hundreds of millions of worthless poor people die... that would be awesome IMO. Remember that the Black Death, which "reduced world population from an estimated 450 million to between 350 and 375 million in the 14th century", had POSITIVE benefits.

...the Black Death raised the standard of living of many survivors who inherited estates from the plague's victims. One sign of this was that peasant families, who, before the plague, were so poor that they sat at the dinner table on a common bench and ate from a common plate, now had individual stools and plates. This higher standard of living would lead to a more even wealth distribution and the recovery of the economy after 1450. (The Black Death and its Impact. c.1300-1450).

Now, one might think that, as a Libertarian, I'd be strongly opposed to "a more even wealth distribution", but what we saw following the Black Death was that those in extreme poverty were raised up to a poverty level that was moderate. Sure, millions will die due to the coming climate catastrophe, most of those will be among the world's poorest. But among those who survive there still will be many who are extremely poor (as most of the population of the world is quite poor).

What I'm saying is that I'm fine with a more even wealth distribution among the poor of the world. The plutocrats will be able to hold onto what is theirs and even increase their wealth when the apocalypse comes (apocalypse in the eyes of those the poor, MANY of which will be exterminated, mostly due to flooding and famine).

BTW, as for the poors being "exterminated", I use that word because surely poor people are a plague upon the world (my view as an Ayn Rand-worshipping Libertarian). Those of us who remain will all be in a better off position (at least in the long term). Which is why I WELCOME the coming climate change catastrophes.

And why I lie about those trying to stop them as being "ridiculous". The world needs a good Randian fumigation to rid the world of the parasites. Moochers like the greedy Bernie voters who think they deserve what the wealthy man has worked hard for. Or worked hard to steal by exploiting workers (as is their right). I'll be applauding when these assholes start starving/dying en masse.

Byline: This awesome Randian commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of climate change denialism. LLIN-232.

Not All Welfare Queens Are Chubby Black Chicks, That's For Certain?

I'm talking about some fat Africoon biotch that got knocked up multiple times by multiple fathers (first by Mookie, then Ray-Ray, then Dre, and finally Slice). And, for each kid the amount of each welfare check goes up. Given the fact that the fathers are deadbeats/criminals (subhuman animals who are likely in prison for dealing drugs). So the chubby biotch has to look to the government for her handouts/free stuff.

Fucking slothful darkies; I hate them so much! All they want to do is steal from productive White people like myself. Which they do by sucking off the government teat. Republicans want to stop this, while Democrats (such as that a-hole Comrade Sanders) run on the promise of increasing the free stuff paid for with other people's money!

Although I must concede that it isn't just lazy Blacks who hold their hands out for free government money. White/rich former journalist, Sam Donaldson once received $97,000 in sheep and mohair subsidies for his New Mexico farm according to an Atlantic article. Outrageous!

Although not as outrageous as the poor lazy Black moochers living on the government dime. Because Donaldson was at least a productive Maker/not a poor loser. One could argue that this was just him getting back some of the (certainly) huge amount of HIS MONEY that he had previously forked over to the federal government in the form of taxes.

Given this fact I'm going to retract my "outrageous" and replace it with a "right on". Hurray for Donaldson for finding a loophole to exploit to get back HIS OWN MONEY. The fact that lazy Blacks welfare queens continue to pop out babies by multiple absent fathers is where I'm going to (continue to) focus my outrage. Which is EXTREME!!

And fuck Black Lives Matter too! Blacks should be concerned about Black on Black violence. Instead of justified police shootings of violent Black animals.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-231.

On The Jim Webb Presidency That Will Never Be

So, the Democrats rejected him for Bernie (a socialist a-hole/dullard) and Hillary (a crooked piece of shit lawyer). Just because he's a Republican? How deflating is that? Man, has that party ever hit the skids.

And, by "skids" I mean returned to it's FDR Progressive roots (HRC pushed there by that Commie fucker Sanders). As opposed to going in a more "Moderate" direction. By which I mean Conservative. Because Webb used to be Republican. Then he pretended to be a Democrat for awhile. A charade that ended with his being soundly (and I mean SOUNDLY) rejected by the American people. Via polling/failing to fund raise. He never got one vote in the primaries, as he dropped out before any were held.

Yes, this is the man who should be president. If not Gary Johnson. Sure, neither stood/stands a chance, but Webb (if he had obtained the Democratic nomination despite being a Republican) surely would have ascended to the White House. While Gary, even though he is still running, will likely not even get one percent of the popular vote.

Don't get me wrong, I'm still voting for (throwing away my vote on) Gary Johnson. But if the American people had been smart enough to get behind Webb and Webb was the Democratic nominee? I'd be voting for him. BTW, by "smart enough" I mean if they had been fooled into believing Webb was a Democrat and not a Republican. But, unfortunately they were not.

But did you hear that Webb's sore LOSERness caused him to say (despite being a Democrat pretending to be Democrat), "I could vote for Trump, but not Hillary"? Yeah, I'd be sore too if I was as soundly rejected by the electorate as Webb was.

However, as I noted previously, the American people saw through his transparent "Democrat" deception. Even though Webb was hopeful that he could trick them, as he tricked the people of Virginia when he ran AND WON a senate seat as a "Democrat". Albeit a Conservative one. But that was in the South where they like their "Democrats" to be of the Conservative variety. Obviously Webb's "Democrat" act failed when presented to the country as a whole, which is a damn shame. Fuck the voters for being so dumb. By which I mean smart.

Image: Jim Webb is, according to the caption on the pic below, "not your average Democrat". By which (I presume) the captioner meant he's a Republican.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-230.

On The Fact That Barack Obama Is A Traitor (Only Question Now? Hang Him Or Imprison Him For Life?)

That Obama released five top Taliban operatives (in exchange for Sargent Bergdahl) at a time when we were still technically at war in Afghanistan was clearly a dereliction of duty. In fact I'd say it was quite traitorous.

Obama should have told the Taliban to behead Bergdahl, IMO. Although, if he had done that some might called Obama coward for letting the letter of the law stand in his way to save Bergdahl and probably called for his impeachment for dereliction of duty to protect US soldiers. Others say that because Bergdahl was a prisoner of war, a status that granted President Obama constitutional authority to secure his release.

But I don't agree with any of that. According to the Right Obama is a traitor for bringing Bergdahl home. They say that this is a soldier that we should have left behind. And I'm with them on this one. Because I often parrot Conservative talking points while pretending to be "Moderate".

Additionally, Obama kinda got Clintonian with Congress, too; saying that the White House wasn't in "direct" communication with the Taliban on a prisoner exchange when they were in fact working through the Qataris (so, not "Clintonian" at all. That just sounded like a cool bash, so I threw it in).

Maybe Obama will join Hillary Clinton behind bars? I'm talking about the fact that the bitch is going to jail for sending classified info on her private email server. Dereliction of duty has got to be worse. As for Barack Obama being imprisoned (Gitmo?) or hanged... I'm just asking.

Byline: This inane commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of agreeing with Conservative BS. LLIN-229.

On My Ideas

Mine are right while yours are wrong. But neither has rights. No yours, not mine, not anyone's. Whatever the fuck that means. I was drunk when I wrote that and forget what the fuck I was talking about (although I frequently get drunk when I'm getting ready for "consensual" sex, this time I was alone).

Anyway, maybe I meant that an idea isn't a person? Regressives often blabber on and on about how corporations aren't people. Yeah, well neither are ideas! Although this idea might be one in a long series of them that point to it being a fact that you'd be hard-pressed to come up with more than three things that this fellow (me) has written during the entire run as a blogger that hasn't either been silly, banal, infuriating, or inane beyond comprehension.

Byline: This inane commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of inanity. LLIN-228.

On Why I Can't Vote For Donald (Although He May Be Our Next President, Which Wouldn't Be So Bad IMO)

Yes, I considered voting for Mr. Trump, but (ultimately) I decided to stick to my original plan of throwing my vote away by casting my ballot for the Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson. You know, the dude who receives less than 1 percent of the popular vote every single time he's run previously (and zippo electoral votes). Meaning he has absolutely no chance of being elected president.

As for me not voting for Donald, there are two main reasons. A) He's a protectionist/nativist who's obviously never read a single page of Bastiat (mustn't have been on the reading-list at Wharton) and B) the fellow doesn't have the temperament to spearhead the world's largest military or to even be a respectable actor on the world's stage (and in a world that's already filled to the brim with clowns like Merkel, Cameron, Netanyahu, Putin, etc., that's saying quite a bit).

Although he is smart enough to suggest that we should be letting Putin take the lead in Syria. When your enemies are slaughtering each other, I say let them. Not that Mrs. Clinton's all that appreciably better, mind you, but, yeah, if you held a gun to my head, I probably have to pick her. For the comedy factor, I'm saying. Because she's going to be arrested shortly, then tried, convicted and sent to prison. For having her own/private email server and sending classified info via that system.

Although, if the Democratic primary voters select someone (before the voting in November) who is convicted of felonies... well, it should be a cakewalk for the Republican nominee to secure the presidency in such a situation. So we might very well end up with a president Donald J. Trump. And, if you held a gun to my head a 2nd time? I might say that sending Donald to the White House wouldn't be that terrible an outcome.

Byline: This insightful commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-227.

On The Fact That There Are Many Drug Dealing Violent Black Animals Behind Bars Where They Belong

According to Manhattan Institute fellow Heather McDonald "the favorite culprits for high black prison rates include a biased legal system, draconian drug enforcement, and even prison itself. None of these explanations stands up to scrutiny. The black incarceration rate is overwhelmingly a function of black crime".

Also, when it comes to drug use, key studies from the "Journal of Urban Health" and "Addictive Behaviors", prove that blacks are three and a half times mote likely to end up in the emergency room due to drugs and they also tend to commit violent crimes at a much higher rate when dealing drugs and the drug charge is generally just an add-on (a minuscule number of folks are in prison just for small-time dealing).

Wouldn't it be nice if these bozos in the media and in politics knew how to interpret data and ditched their fucking narratives? What would help a great deal, I think, would be if they adopted the narrative of people like McDonald, myself and Stormfront. Which is that Black people are fucking animals who inherently violent and criminal. And locking them up is the only solution.

Bleeding heart Liberals want us to think that racism itself is the root cause of black crime, that there is "a bedrock racism that segregates, undereducates, and marginalizes them in every way come to mind". These fucker want us "to imagine that a hated group responds with disfunction?"

What is systemic racism? (excerpt) Systemic racism includes the complex array of antiblack practices, the unjustly gained political-economic power of whites, the continuing economic and other resource inequalities along racial lines, and the white racist ideologies and attitudes created to maintain and rationalize white privilege and power. Systemic here means that the core racist realities are manifested in each of society’s major parts ... each major part of U.S. society - the economy, politics, education, religion, the family - reflects the fundamental reality of systemic racism. (Systemic Racism: Beyond Prejudice and Micro-Agressions by Nicki Lisa Cole. About Education, Updated 10/23/2015).

What a load of crap. The truth is that Blacks have no one to blame but themselves, because racism, instead of being "systemic" is all but dead. Because White people are logical and civilized. Blacks could learn a lot by following the example of higher-ordered persons such as myself. Alas, most darkies are lower-ordered, explaining why most are so violent and prone to criminality. That is just a biological fact. Deal with it libtards!

Byline: This higher-ordered commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-226.

George Clooney Is A Leftist Piece Of Shit!

Apparently it takes $33,000 to meet Hillary Clinton and George Clooney these days. Yeah, that's about $32,999.99 more than I'd be willing to dish out. On a generous day.

I guess George doesn't know that Hillary is heading to the slammer very soon. Because if he did he might think about backing another candidate other than the lying bitch. Jim Webb would have been who I'd have gone with if I were a Democrat. Heck, even as a Libertarian I think I'd have at least considered voting for him over Johnson (given the fact that Johnson has ZERO chance of be selected as our next POTUS).

I mean, of all the Democrats that started out seeking the nomination, all but Jim Web reduced themselves to that level of pandering was sad, nauseating, and disturbing. Flat out. Jim Webb is a war hero, as well as an awesome stud of unquestioned integrity who's accomplished things in both the public AND private sector and who's done so in a consistently bipartisan manner. And, for the record, his being forced to share a debate-stage with four extremely mediocre and hackneyed-ladened surface-thinkers who couldn't come up with an original idea at gunpoint was an outrage! That's how I saw it, folks.

Webb not being selected by the voters by overwhelming margins shows how stupid the electorate has become. Hell yes, this constitutes a loss for the American people, who, instead are voting for either the soon-to-be-convicted lying piece of shit bitch or the Communist USSR-honeymooning economically illiterate boob. But I think both parties' candidates are quite horrible this cycle. Except for Donald Trump. He, IMO, isn't half as bad as the media is making him out to be.

BTW, all the ladies swoon over George Clooney, but IMO Jim Webb is a lot manlier/handsome (hence my previous reference to him as a "stud"). It just amazes me the way that people go crazy whenever George Clooney stars in a movie. And, yes, folks, when I say it amazes me, I mean it COMPLETELY amazes me.

So, no, I'm not really a fan of his acting, although I might concede that he's serviceable in his better parts. But he really needs to stay out of political matters. Unless he had come out for Jim Webb. Then I'd be heaping praise on his acting abilities and good judgement. But HRC? What a frigging self aggrandizing ass horse's ass - as well as a God damned idiot/stooge this Clooney fellow is.

I hate the regressive Left so much, I'd like to punch Clooney in the nose while wearing brass knuckles, then continue punching him until I beat his face to a bloody pulp!

Byline: This insiteful commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-225.

On the Assertion That Asserters Should Be Believed Absolutely

It's ludicrous and it's patronizing. Unless of course unless the one doing the asserting is Willis V. Hart. Then of course he should be believed without question! BTW, what I'm asserting today is that women lie and they probably do it way more often than men do.

Surely when it comes to the lie about getting raped, which is a lie women tell far to frequently. Instead of being "raped", most often these lying bitches simply got drunk and regretted having sex that they consented to! And do we really and truly want to put men away for 20 years just 'cause the woman had some second thoughts the next day? Come on!

BTW, if this blog suddenly looks like it's been abandoned (no posts for a long period of time), it's likely because I've been sent up the river for 20 years! All because I liquored up a slut who obviously wanted it, then she said I "raped" her the next morning. Now I'm going to have to spend a lot of money hiring a lawyer to defend me against these bogus charges?

I'm going to have to sit there in court while this lying biotch tells a tall tale regarding how I hired her to babysit my kids, then, when she showed up she found I didn't have any? Outrageous!

Byline: This truthful commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-224.

On The Fact That Willis Hart Is Smart And You Are Dumb

The average voter in America being dumber than a box of rocks (all too willing to accept the whole "free lunch" narrative), it's not a high bar. So, given that fact, I, Willis Hart am a genius in comparison. Also not in comparison, but in reality as well. Being a Libertarian, and given the fact that Libertarians are an insignificant voting block, clearly I'm in the 1% of the smartest individuals on the plant (or less, given that Gary Johnson received less than 1% of the vote).

Which brings me to an individual longtime readers of this blog will surely be familiar with, a man who used to blog here under the moniker "Lying Lester" (AKA Les Carpenter of RNUSA). A man who used to identify as an anarcho-captitalist (a batshit crazy Libertarian offshoot, followers of which believe in subjagation for the poors. Or death if they refuse to submit).

Les Carpenter also worshiped the great philosopher Ayn Rand (she who rightly identified greedy poors as parasites) and thoroughly despised the Progressive Left. And, it was for these reasons I USED to have great respect for him. Because we were so very strongly in agreement, as I believe in all these things as well... I'm batshit crazy, hate poors and progressives (I'd have added that I also worship Rand, but that would be redundant, as all worshippers of Rand are batshit crazy).

But now Les has degenerated into somebody who essentially signs off on every cockamamie Leftist notion under the damned sun - from demonizing fossil fuels to playing the race card to demagoguing on income inequality, class warfare, etc. Which makes me wonder what the fuck happened? He's getting up there in years, so perhaps it's senility? Perhaps he fell and hit his head and is suffering from brain damage? (Or, perhaps it's that the hit to the head reversed some pre-existing brain damage?)

Whatever the explanation, this is exponentially far from normal behavior and, yes, when you throw in the whole Jersey McJones alter-ego, it's damned near psychotic. Now he agrees with that asshole Bernie Sanders that government confiscation on a frightening scale is exactly what the US needs?!

Me? I know it won't make America great again. And yeah, that's a nod to Donald Trump. A candidate who might not be so bad, but that's only compared to the others (who are all terrible beyond comprehension). Which is why I'm voting for Gary Johnson, the only man who can save America. Although Trump might not do too much damage as potus.

Which is why I'm hoping that if our next president isn't Gary Johnson (the candidate the electorate is too dumb to vote for) then it's Donald Trump. Although it SHOULD be Johnson. But, like I said, the electorate is way too dumb to elect him.

Les Carpenter SAYS he's voting for Johnson, but he also bashes Donald Trump non-stop on his blog, which seriously disappoints me. And has written positive things about that fucker Comrade Sanders, as well as slammed me for pointing out how violent Black people are (in agreement with the hard-core racial demagogue, Octopus). Fuck both of them!

Image: A simple depiction of why I support anarcho-capitalism, a system under which worthless scumbag poors are forced to submit to their wealthy superiors... or die.

Byline: This hyper-intelligent commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts and proud worshipper of our wealthy overlords. LLIN-223.

POS Trayvon Martin's Life Did Not Matter

Did you know that (according to the Reno Gazette-Journal's fact checker) in the 503 Days between the Zimmerman shooting (IN SELF DEFENSE) of that piece of shit Trayvon Martin and the end of Zimmerman's trial, 3,224 Black people were killed by other Black people (many of them likely named Mookie, Ray-Ray, Dre or Slice)? Of course you didn't - 99.9% of us couldn't name a single one of them.

It's a damned shame these Blacks are so violent. Perhaps the Black Lives Matter fuckers should focus on that? But, nah, they have their ideological angle, so where in the fuck would anybody get an idea like that?

BTW, Trayvon (another of these violent thugs), absolutely got what was coming to him. So NO, his life did not matter. Not to me, in any case. And if you don't like it? Well, you can go fuck yourself.

By the way, did you also know that it's a fact that (according to the NYPD Crime and enforcement activity in NYC Report and Analysis of 2015) Blacks in New York City Are 10.7 times more likely to commit murder than Whites and when you figure in population that figure climbs all the way to 19.3?

Most of the victims of this carnage, they're black, too. Another inconvenient fact for the assholes at Black Lives Matters. Apparently these Black lives don't matter. Apparently they only give a shit when Whitey kills a Black man. Me, Blacks killing other Blacks is the ONLY carnage I care about. I mean, if a White police officer kills a Black suspect it obviously was because they were asking for it.

Some might say that "according to research, African Americans receive up to 60% longer federal prison sentences than whites who commit similar offenses, and 20% longer prison sentences than whites who commit the same offenses". Also "some academic sources state that this is partially due to prosecutors over-charging African American defendants in contrast to white defendants", but I say that's complete bullshit.

Everyone knows the reason for this is because Blacks are so much more violent than Whites. And that's the reason they deserve to be "over charged" and given longer prison sentences. Frankly, I'm of the opinion that we need to get TOUGHER with these animals. Lock them up and throw away the key would be my solution.

As for George Zimmerman... he was just taking out the trash. Sorry, but yes.

Byline: This 100 percent accurate and 100 percent non-racist commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart (A proud White man). Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-222.

On The Fact That Donald Trump (Or Whoever The Republicans Nominate) Will Likely Be Our Next President (And Hillary Clinton Will Get Prison Time)

Have you heard that Hillary Clinton's lead over Bernie Sanders in New York seems to be shrinking? It's obviously not good news for Mrs. Clinton but if I was her I'd probably be a shitload more concerned about the Justice Department and FBI primaries than the New York one. Because if Miss Hillary loses those two everything else is purely academic.

And I absolutely believe she will. Be indicted and sent up the river, that is. Or I pray she is. I mean, how awesome would that be? Finally, an end to Miss Hillary's life of crime. It's about time, I say. Unfortunately she'll likely only get a few years, instead of the rest of her life. Which she should receive, given the many decades of criminal activity she's been involved in.

Some people say she murdered Vince Foster. Now, I don't know if there is anything to that charge, but I absolutely do think she's guilty of enough other crimes that she should be locked up and the key should be thrown away. Although, yeah, I surely do believe she's capable of murder.

By the way, that means that Comrade Sanders will likely be the Democratic nominee. And be crushed by whoever the Republicans nominate. Which, given the fact that he's won the most votes, should be Donald Trump. But there might be a "brokered convention" and the nomination might be stolen from Mr. Trump. I just hope the nominee isn't Ted Cruz. I'd be content with Trump or Kasich.

Not that I'd vote for either of these guys (I'm a Johnson man). But any Republican would be better than the pantsuit-wearing piece of shit bitch Hillary or the economically illiterate mouth-breathing moron Sanders. We're talking a "lesser of two evils" situation. But Trump or Kasich (not Cruz) would be significantly the lesser of two evils, of that I am 99.9 percent convinced.

But back to Miss Hillary... how many years behind bars do you think she'll get? I hear that Petraeus got 2 years of probation and a 100k fine. Given the fact that what Miss Hillary did was 100 times worse, I says she should get 100 years in prison and a 10 million dollar fine.

Byline: This 100 percent accurate commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-221.

Minorities Whining About "Cultural Appropriation" Make Me Sick!

Did you know that there actually exists something called "cultural appropriation" (White folks wearing dreadlocks, sombreros, dead-dresses, etc)? Yeah, I'll take, "unimpeachable evidence that the West and its minorities have officially run out of childish, perplexing, and idiotic things to be offended by", for a thousand, Alex.

And if you don't think that this is stupid, just try and imagine how you'd feel if a white person had accosted a black woman just because she had dyed her hair blond and was wearing green contact lenses. Yeah, huh?

Frankly I'm sick and tired of these brown whiners! So hell yes, I disagree that "cultural appropriation typically involves members of a dominant group exploiting the culture of less privileged groups — often with little understanding of the latter's history, experience and traditions".

That quote from an article that explains why cultural appropriation is "wrong". More from this dumbass commentary below.

Why Cultural Appropriation Is a Problem: Cultural appropriation remains a concern for a variety of reasons. For one, this sort of "borrowing" is exploitative because it robs minority groups of the credit they deserve. Art and music forms that originated with minority groups come to be associated with members of the dominant group. As a result, the dominant group is deemed innovative and edgy, while the disadvantaged groups they "borrow" from continue to face negative stereotypes that imply they're lacking in intelligence and creativity. In addition, when members of a dominant group appropriate the cultures of others, they often reinforce stereotypes about minority groups. (What Is Cultural Appropriation and Why Is It Wrong? by Nadra Kareem Nittle. About News Updated 6/22/2015.).

More whining. By the way, I find it totally perplexing because I'm White. I'll admit that. But so what? Anyway, White people "stealing credit"? Isn't stealing something Black people do? I'm pretty sure it is. Aside from Statist assholes like Bernie Sanders stealing on behalf of the government, I'm pretty sure it's Black people who commit most of these crimes (and get sent to prison for them in higher percentages than Whites).

Which is why I say that, if you're a minority that whines about this bullshit... fuck you, you make me sick!

Byline: This outraged commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-220.

White European Feminist Chicks Aren't Objecting To Getting Raped By Brown Muslim Men Because That Would Be Racist

The following from World Net Daily, my go-to trusted news source (1/31/2016 article by the incomparable Joseph Farah).

Europe's Muslim Rape Epidemic (excerpt) When 850,000 so-called "refugees" – mostly male Muslims – stormed the borders of Europe earlier this year, a looming rape crisis was predictable from the start. What happened in the microcosm of Rotherham, England, between 1997 and 2013 should have been still fresh in the minds of the public and the officials who resettled the mostly Sunni populations in Germany, France, England, Sweden, Denmark, Austria, Finland and Switzerland – all of which experienced a 2016 New Year's Eve nightmare of sexual assaults. (link).

Did you also know that it's a fact that a great many Leftist feminists in Europe would rather get raped by one of these illiterate, violent and egregiously medieval piece-of-shit scumbag savage ragheads than have one of their White European male counterparts defend them (as many were during the 2016 New Year's eve sexual assaults in Germany)? Why? Because that would be "racist".

BTW, by "piece-of-shit" I mean they have brown skin; brown being the color of shit. A prime example of the slow-bleed suicide Europe is committing. Me, I'm with Farah who points out that the solution to this problem is to not let in these raghead "refugees".

Yeah, there is no doubt in my mind that all these male ragheads were sent here by ISIS/Muslim terrorists (organizations that are VERY representative of Islam) to pretend to be refugees in order to rape White women. On this candidate Trump was another individual who got it absolutely correct.

Next on their agenda is the United States (they want to send "refugees" here to rape our women). And Barack Obama is, for some inexplicable reason, helping them! Something that makes me wonder if he might really be a Muslim/terrorist Manchurian candidate. I mean, I actually voted for Obama the first time (NOT the second). But now?

Byline: This outraged commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-219.

On the Fact That Bernie Sanders Plunders More Private Property From US Citizens Through Civil Asset Forfeiture Than Burglars Do

https://www.illinoispolicy.org/law-enforcement-now-seizes-more-property-from-citizens-than-burglars/

Sure, it isn't that asshole Bernie Sanders solely who is engaged in this plundering. Elizabeth Warren and Barney Frank are the other two participants in this trio of greedy thieves who are good at plundering. With these 3 individuals in office (who, if you look at the fine-print of their progressive mission-statement it reads, "except when the oppressor is the state") no lockbox is safe.

Yes, some of the people targeted are criminals but a lot of them aren't (shopkeepers who don't take credit cards and who only accept cash, for example), and none of them are ever presumed innocent. Of course, the real scary thing here is that the problem may even be worse than this.

According to the libertarian Institute for Justice (the ONLY people who give a damn about this injustice), a) state and local police forces are also abusing this practise and b) a lot of the stolen property (yeah, that's what I call it) ends up off the books and so the tally may in fact be much higher.

Oh, and most of the people being hurt by this; yeah, they tend to be poor and working class. Yet another huge blind-spot for the supposed social-justice warrior Bernie Sanders! Which is why I say, fuck you Bernie!

Of course, some of Comrade Sanders supporters might point to the following page from his website, but I say do not let the following fool you.

An Excerpt from the Bernie Sanders "Racial Justice Page": In many cities all over our country, the incentives for policing are upside down. Departments are bringing in substantial sums of revenue by seizing the personal property of people who are suspected of criminal involvement. So-called civil asset forfeiture laws allow police to take property from people even before they are charged with a crime, much less convicted of one. Even worse, the system works in a way that makes it very difficult and expensive for an innocent person to get his or her property back. We must end programs that actually reward officials for seizing assets without a criminal conviction or other lawful mandate. Departments and officers should not profit off of such seizures. Local governments that rely on tickets and fines to pay bills can become dependent on implicit quotas for law enforcement. When policing is a source of revenue tied to the financial sustainability of agencies, officers are pressured to meet internal goals which can lead to unnecessary or unlawful traffic stops and citations which disproportionately affect people of color. Implicit quota systems promote racial stereotyping and breed distrust between officers and communities of color. (link).

Sounds good, huh? But I'll tell you what my problem is with this page, which is that Sanders addresses civil asset forfeiture in the context of "racial justice", as if "Whitey" has never been subjected to this State crime! Yeah, and Comrade Sanders put this in his platform due to pressure from the extremist group "Black Lives Matter" (the group that has the AUDACITY to blame Black deaths on law enforcement, when the FACT is that it's Black on Black violence that is the cause of most Black deaths)!!

Which is how I know that Bernie (on this matter) is a fucking liar (in addition to being a liar on MANY other issues). He's only pandering to BLM, and the fucker isn't really interested in doing squat regarding civil asset thievery. If he was, why not propose legislation RIGHT NOW? Why can he only do this if elected president? Don't fall for Comrade Sanders' lies, people!

Byline: This outraged commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-218.

JFK Was A Fiscally Conservative Republican (Just Like MLK)

Was John Fitzgerald Kennedy a fan of Ayn Rand? I don't know. But if he were alive today I'm positive he would be a Libertarian. For his time the facts show that he was a conservative Democrat that could have run as a Republican. This conclusion due to the fact that he warned us about the dangers of big government, AKA "Leviathan".

"As the responsibilities of government become enlarged, there has been a corresponding assumption of authority by the state. It is obvious from the history of the past twenty years that whether we like it or not, whether we be Republicans or Democrats, the government will continue to play an increasingly large part in our lives. The theme of today - the scarlet thread that runs throughout all of the thoughts and actions of people all over the world - is one of resignation of great problems to the all-absorbing hands of the great Leviathan - the state. The trend is not divisible. We in the United States suffer from it, if less intensely". (10/18/1949. From a speech before the Miami Junior Chamber of Commerce). And two months later at the University of Notre Dame, this conclusion: "It is therefore vital that we become concerned with maintaining the authority of the people, of the individual, over the state".

Inspiring words and, yes, light-years different from the statist bull-crap currently emanating from Sanders and even Hillary now. So, you still think that only the Republicans have changed?

As for Martin Luther King Jr... he actually was a Republican. Yeah, I'm sure that, in response to my assertions, many Democrats will say that I'm with those on the Right who are trying to co-opt these figures because they're popular. And, since efforts to sully their reputations have largely failed, attempting to rewrite history and claim they were actually Conservative is a better course of action.

To that I say phooey. Sure, there may be something to these "co-opting" charges, but I say "so what". Personally I think it's a good strategy.

Byline: This insightful commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-217.

Bernie Sanders Is An Insane Lunatic Who Will Destroy Our Republic If Elected!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Firstly, the number of exclamation points I used in the title of post? They are TOTALLY warranted! The reason? Lately I've been thinking that Mrs. Clinton HAS to know that Bernie Sanders is monumentally full of shit and a total lunatic but because the Democratic primary voters are just as outside the mainstream as those on the Republican side she's afraid to bitch-slap him and has even tried to match his Leftist pandering at times!!

I mean, we all know that Hillary Clinton is actually a Moderate to Conservative Democrat and Comrade Sanders is a fucking Socialist, who if elected president, could destroy our Republic! This is exactly why democracies have a penchant to devour themselves (the fact that people when given the choice will almost always vote for those who promise them the most while making others pay for it) and why the Founding Fathers created a Republic instead.

Hopefully we still have enough checks and balances to ward off a total collectivist coup and right out fiscal ship. 'Cause if we don't, watch out. You can be sure that a president Sanders will try his damndest to make our beloved wealthy Makers pay "their fair share". What a fucking asshole. This drooling maniac should be straight-jacketed and locked up in a mental institution. Instead he's running for president? Unbelievable!

Yeah, that's why I'm 100 percent convinced that Donald Trump might not be that bad of a president. Although I'll be voting for Gary Johnson I realize he has no chance of actually getting elected. So Trump getting in might be the best we can hope for. Especially if Bernie Sanders clinches the nomination, Ayn Rand forbid!

Even if it's getting less and less likely... and more and more likely that Hillary will be the nominee (unless she's indicted, convicted, and sent up the river). Yeah, I really think that's a distinct possibility. And then what? A Trump versus Sanders race. Which means that Sanders could actually win! Hopefully we still have enough checks and balances to ward off a total collectivist coup and right out fiscal ship. 'Cause if we don't, watch out.

I might move to Hong Kong.

Byline: This insightful commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-216.

On The Fact That Political Hacks Bernie Sanders, Barney Frank & Elizabeth Warren Want To Steal Your Property

I heard that Bernie Sanders, Barney Frank, and Elizabeth Warren got together and decided that they fully supported thievery via government by the way of civil asset forfeiture and property seizure by way of eminent domain. Not surprising in that if you look at the fine-print of their progressive mission-statement it reads, "except when the oppressor is the state".

A lot of people don't realize it but the IRS can confiscate your life-savings and they don't even have to charge you with a crime first. It's called civil forfeiture and, while its initial purpose was mostly to target drug-dealers, it has quite literally made criminals of small business owners whose only sin is the fact that they don't take credit cards and make small deposits in cash (restructuring, its called; the IRS evidently seeing cash dealings as intrinsically suspicious).

Of course, the really scary thing in all of these scenarios is that a) the plaintiff (i.e. victim) is never innocent until proven guilty but guilty until proven innocent and b) if it wasn't for groups like the Institute for Justice (a LIBERTARIAN outfit - the progressives sitting it out again) most of us wouldn't even know about this shit. The government as a powerful force for good? Yeah, right.

By the way, I totally lied when I said that Bernie Sanders fully supports thievery by way of civil asset forfeiture. What he actually said is "that he will fight civil forfeiture, and that it's a big issue which basically punishes the poor".

Punishing the poor? I'm actually in favor of it. Although I'm for "punishing" them by taking away the free stuff. Bernie Sanders wants to give the freeloaders a LOT more free goodies! Anyway, as Bernie himself said, "he's learning more about it". Right. Sounds like a totally bullshit excuse to me. He's been in Congress for decades and now he's only catching up now? I doubt he'll do a damn thing, except perhaps vote to continue seizing the assets of small business owners (who he hates). What a fucking asshole!

Proof of Bernie's hatred is the fact that he wants to force small business owners to overpay low-wage workers and thus drive them out of business. The truth is that there is no limit to the number of taxes that Bernie Sanders wants to increase and there is no limit to the amount of new government he wants to create. Personally, I don't think that's where the American people want government to go. They're tired of these big-government solutions.

Libertarians, on the other hand? They believe in empowering people so that they can pursue their own American dream. Which bodes well for the Gary Johnson candidacy, I think. Perhaps the American people will wise up and elect this awesome Libertarian their next president? Sadly, this probably won't happen. Due to the fact that there are too many lazy freeloaders voting. Some Whites. But also (in HIGHER percentages) lazy Blacks (who are also VERY violent, but I digress).

I commend the GOP for its vote suppression tactics, but (unless they REALLY ramp up the voter suppression), it might not be enough. And, even if it is, it won't work in Gary Johnson's favor. Goddamn it!

Byline: This factual commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-215.