tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-82360382563434185412024-03-12T19:55:24.900-07:00Willis Hart's LLINA Ayn Rand worshiping Libertarian blog authored by a Moderate Independent Blue Dog who despises Progressives.Dervish Sandershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comBlogger314125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-35694602195678546472018-02-10T03:48:00.001-08:002023-09-03T16:13:59.039-07:00I Am A Proud Racist<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<p>
By "racist" I mean someone who recognizes the FACT that Whites are superior and that other races are inferior. And not only inferior, but criminally inclined and violent. Take <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2018/02/south-africa-canary-in-coal-mine.html">a look</a> at South Africa, for example. There White Farmers are being murdered by the violent jigaboos on an unprecedented scale.</p>
<p>
Is this seriously what we want for the United States? A multicultural hell? I know I surely do not. This is why I support our excellent president's plan to greatly reduce the flow of immigrants from shithole nations. Yeah, when Trump called these countries "shitholes" the liberal media cried foul. But Trump told the truth. These countries (the ones inhabited by low-IQ violent jigs) ARE shitholes!</p>
<p>
For this reason people say Trump is a "racist". But I am exactly the same sort of "racist". A person who thinks America should remain a majority White nation. Now, I am no "White Separatist", but if we could reverse course I'd be all for that. I refer to the demographic trend some refer to as the "<a href="https://www.npr.org/2016/10/12/497529936/how-the-browning-of-america-is-upending-both-political-parties">browning of America</a>".</p>
<p>
That is why I am 100% behind our president and his desire for more immigration from White nations. There needs to be enough Whites to keep the violent jigs in their place. If, Ayn Rand forbid, this country ever becomes majority minority, we will be fucked. Just like in South Africa, where the murder rate of White farmers is through the roof, the jigs here will get a lot more violent. Mark my words! They can't help it because it is their nature.</p>
<p>
<span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. Purveyor of racism. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-314</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-27810300175258905472018-01-17T07:32:00.003-08:002023-09-03T17:21:28.290-07:00Known Crackpot WD Never Wrote For This Blog<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<p>
As you may have noticed, this blog has not been updated for some time. Fact is, I totally forgot I had it. After I lost all my commenters on my primary blog, <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/">Contra O'Reilly</a>, I stopped checking in here. For the record, my assistant, <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/search/label/Authored%20by%20Arnie">Arnie Hanson</a> had been writing all the commentaries here for awhile. Or "co-authoring" them. "Take my Contra O'Reilly posts and rewrite them for the LLIN blog" I told him.</p>
<p>
Apparently he stopped updating this blog more than a year ago, even though he DID continue to collect paychecks from yours truly. Well, when I found out I fired his ass. Anyway, I was recently pursuing old posts at the blog <a href="https://whosyourdaddy-lisa1.blogspot.com">Who's Your Daddy</a> and ran across the following comments. Comments that caught my attention due to the factual inaccuracies they contain.</p>
<p>
<table class="boxed"><tr><td><a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/14232914458379098036">Rusty Shackelford</a>: Poor RN, he got caught telling outright lies on three blogs I know of (there may be more) and got banned from commenting. I mean how much credence can one put into anything this guy says. He just cant seem to tell the truth. In fact WD, a half a lunatic got so tired of RN's lying he started a blog called Lying Lesters Irrational Nation... (<a href="http://whosyourdaddy-lisa1.blogspot.com/2015/10/liberal-tolerance-police.html?showComment=1444791326094#c2969199847867960861">10/13/2015 at 7:55pm</a>).<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/01120280762698472496">Rational Nation USA</a>: I have been banned from there blogs. Two conservative intolerant weblogs that refuse to discuss issues truthfully, Contra O'Reilly and FreeThinke. The other is a progressive weblog that like the conservative weblogs refused to discuss issues truthfully. Being banned from those weblogs is of no consequence to me. Well, other than the satisfaction having exposed them for the intolerant frauds they are.<br />
<br />
As for WD, yup, he and I had profound differences and his LLIN was the result of that. Willis Hart is now the featured blogger on both that weblog renamed for him as well as Willis being featured on Oligarchic Stooge Talk. Keep on trucking in the sludge if your addled brain Shackelford. Keep on trucking. (<a href="http://whosyourdaddy-lisa1.blogspot.com/2015/10/liberal-tolerance-police.html?showComment=1444793165695#c1848026980723826504">10/13/2015 at 8:26pm</a>).<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/14232914458379098036">Rusty Shackelford</a>: Poor RN... its always everyone other but his fault... "they refuse to discuss issues truthfully." What that means, they don't pay attention to his silliness. Wiil Hart and FT are head and shoulders smarter then poor Lester, he just has a difficult time admitting the truth. <font color="red">As for WD, a known crackpot</font>, even he see's Lester for what he is... a liar of the first degree. (<a href="http://whosyourdaddy-lisa1.blogspot.com/2015/10/liberal-tolerance-police.html?showComment=1444797389041#c575691654301107471">10/13/2015 at 9:36pm</a>).</td></tr></table></p>
<p>
Let me be clear... WD (AKA <a href="https://plus.google.com/101000896697955398420">Dervish Sanders</a>) never wrote for this blog. <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/01120280762698472496">Rational Nation</a>, <a href="https://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/06/on-curious-case-of-rational-nation-and.html">a former</a> anarcho-capitalist classical-liberal worshiper of Ayn Rand who despised progressives TURNED Progressive Liberal, USED to write for this blog, but not WD. I did allow Sanders to comment here, but he absolutely never authored any posts.</p>
<p>
BTW, Rational Nation (AKA Les Carpenter) started this blog. Then he invited me on as a contributor. Les foolishly made me an "administrator", so (after our falling out) I changed the passwords and kicked him off LLIN. Previously I wrote about how I took over this blog, authoring a <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/2015/06/willis-harts-lying-lester-blog-hostile.html">bullshit story</a> about how I purchased a controlling share of LLIN stock.</p>
<p>
The truth is that I didn't buy LLIN, I stole it. Although my impression was that Les didn't care. After his transformation from anarcho-capitalist into Progressive Liberal he had no interest in writing for this blog any more. I think he would have either abandoned LLIN or deleted it (if I hadn't stole it).</p>
<p>
In any case, I don't know about Rusty's claim that Les "got caught telling outright lies". I banned him, not for lying (per se), but for <a href="http://rationalnationusa.blogspot.com/2014/10/police-mistake-teen-male-for-burgler.html?showComment=1413027591109#c7363203254584564839">voicing agreement</a> with that asshole <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/07589336822561030860">Octopus</a>.</p>
<p>
Octopus <a href="http://rationalnationusa.blogspot.com/2015/06/ignoring-likely-realities.html?showComment=1434935341881#c7086013423438763650">wrote</a> "Yup, RACIAL PROFILING is the same as RACISM, and Will-the-Shill has demonstrated both in this comment thread" and in response Les wrote "Of late he has drifted into more hard core fringe views. Unfortunate as it may be it is what it is".</p>
<p>
Wow. Thanks for the impassioned defense, buddy. This comment, in a thread on RN's blog attached to a June 2015 post about the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston_church_shooting">Charleston church shooting</a> of 2/17/2015, was what tipped me off to the fact that RN had crossed over to the other side. That is when he officially became a Progressive Liberal (as far as I am concerned). Progressive Liberals (like Octopus) are immune to the facts concerning how violent Black people are.</p>
<p>
Obviously Les is willing to tolerate accusations of "racism" from scumbags like Octopus regarding sane people (like myself) who point out the facts. It was not long after this assault (on Rational Nation's blog) that I banned him from further comment on Contra O'Reilly. So I hope that clears things up. Dervish Sanders never wrote for this blog. A number of people have, but WD was never an author.</p>
<p>
Dennis Marks wrote <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/search/label/Authored%20by%20Dennis">1 post</a>. Arnie Hanson wrote <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/search/label/Authored%20by%20Arnie">2 posts</a>. Lyle Lester wrote <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/search/label/Authored%20by%20Lyle">5 posts</a>. Rational Nation (AKA "Lying Lester") wrote <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/search/label/Authored%20by%20Lester">145</a>. NONE of those people are authors here any longer.</p>
<p>
Dervish Sanders wrote zero posts. All the other commentaries were written by me. A total of <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/search/label/Authored%20by%20Willis">161 posts</a> prior to the publication of this one. A post, BTW, which might be the last one published on this blog. Given the fact that I've lost interest in writing here. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/">Contra O'Reilly</a> remains active, I'd like to point out. I am not, however, accepting comments on Contra O'Reilly.</p>
<p>
Mosey on over if you want to read my thoughts on politics, race relations, sports, hot chicks and lesbians, and a few other topics. But don't expect to be able to comment. Commenting is restricted to "team members" only. Also, I am the only "team member".</p>
<p>
That WD is a crackpot is one fact that my old buddy Rusty Shackelford got correct, I'd like to note (in closing). Also (perhaps) a FULL lunatic (he trolled my blog for several years which <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2013/09/this-is-your-last-warning-wd.html">angered me greatly</a>) and was (partly) responsible for why I no longer accept comments. I just DO NOT want to hear from people who have (incorrect) opinions that differ from my own (correct) opinions.</p>
<p>
<span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. Purveyor of correct opinions. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-313</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-51703486927180376172016-09-24T07:50:00.000-07:002016-09-28T08:12:19.317-07:00On CNN's Virtue Signaling Social Justice Warriors<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>I refer to CNN's post debate coverage Monday night (9/26/2016). Six people criticizing Trump (seven if you include the increasingly more and more difficult to stomach host, Anderson Cooper), two people defending the guy. So, no, not even remotely balanced. Though, yes, it was better than MSNBC, where even the Republican pundits - Steve Schmidt, Nicole Wallace - fall all over themselves in a rank effort to virtue-signal, be liked, etc.</p><p>They'll be sorry when Mr. Trump is in the White House. He'll have his revenge then, I'm sure. It's almost enough to make me root for Trump. But, yes, I'm still voting for <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/08/gary-johnson-just-has-one-simple-question-and-what-is-aleppo/">Gary "what's Aleppo" Johnson</a>.</p><p>Despite him having zero chance of being elected. I'm sticking to my principals and not voting for the lesser of two evils (I'm voting for the greater evil). Because I'm convinced that Gary Johnson would make the best president. In that he'd cater to the needs of the oligarchs the best.</p><p>BTW, why the hell wasn't Gary Johnson up on that debate stage? Trump is implying that (if he loses) that it will be because the election was rigged. But what about Gary Johnson? Is the election not rigged against him? But the elites knew that, if he had been allowed on the debate stage, he'd surely have mopped the floor with DJT and HRC.</p><p>And likely ended up our next president. But, given that he's getting no exposure? He can't win when people don't know who he is. Which is the point, of course. To suppress Gary's message of building up our oligarchs even more and crushing the poor and middle class even more than they are currently being crushed.</p><p>Although (to be completely honest, which <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2014/08/on-rump-conclusion-that-gary-johnson.html">in the past I haven't been</a>) he cloaks that message in lies. Because the ignorant and stupid voters wouldn't like his real message (that they NEED to be crushed for the good of our oligarchs).</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/09/on-cnns-post-debate-coverage-last-night.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-312</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-87595704940089762152016-09-08T16:59:00.000-07:002016-09-09T06:41:27.976-07:00My Favorite "Prussian Blue" Song?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/htnZ_e48Ld4?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p>It would have to be this one. A lyric from <a href="http://www.metrolyrics.com/aryan-man-awake-lyrics-prussian-blue.html">Aryan Man Awake</a> says "and black masked men with guns come bashing down the doors"... which is something that I, as a White man, live in fear of.</p><p>Extreme fear that gives me the night sweats. So, while I don't own a gun, I'm not about to place a sign in my yard saying so. That would be an invitation for the black masked men to come bashing down my door. Darkies with names like Mookie, Ray-Ray, Dre and Slice. They, instead of working hard and earning what they have, want to steal from me.</p><p>Anyway, the Prussian Blue gals nail it in this song. Although I think someone else likely wrote the lyrics. In fact, according to the Prussian Blue Wikipedia page the sisters (fraternal twins born on 6/30/1992) they're now "laid-back liberals celebrating the joys of ethnic diversity".</p><p>What a shame. Although they apparently still believe that the Holocaust was exaggerated. Which, as I've <a href="https://www.google.com/#q=site:http:%2F%2Fparanoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com%2F+holocaust">pointed out</a> on my other blog (<a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2014/11/holocaust-by-numbers.html">Contra O'Reilly</a>) is absolutely a fact (that Jew whiners inflate the numbers).</p><p>But there are no "joys" to ethnic diversity. Unless you think being attacked by a violent Black thug is "enjoyable". Which I do not. Still a great song though.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/09/my-all-time-favorite-rosanne-cash-song.html">Purveyor of racism</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-311</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-48912322293775238432016-09-06T15:17:00.000-07:002016-09-06T15:23:09.876-07:00On The Fact That Most Blacks Are Incredibly Stupid (And YES, It's A Fact)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Did you know that the Left has the tendency to remove any and all <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_agency">moral agency</a> from Black people? Probably not, I'd bet. But, to me, this is quite possibly the most insidious form of racism that exists! Why? Because the Left does it. Or so I say, regardless of whether or not it's true.</p><p>The Left would likely counter that it's the Right that has a tendency to remove any and all moral agency from the wealthy and corporations. Examples being the "affluenza" kid and Corporate killers getting off with <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/judge-h-lee-sarokin/deaths-caused-by-corporat_b_5348182.html">mere fines</a> (and with nobody getting jail time. Even when people are killed).</p><p>In any case, I cannot for the life of me understand why 80 to 90% of black people (those whose names aren't Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, John McWhorter, Robert Woodson, Shelby Steele, etc.) continue to put up with it. Seriously. They should come over to the Right where corporate criminals and rich people get all the breaks. The people who deserve them.</p><p>The only explanation I can come up with this that Blacks are incredibly stupid. Genetically, I mean. Also very much like little children (albeit incredibly violent and criminally inclined children). Explaining why the Left treats them like little children. But children can't grow up unless they're show that they are responsible for their actions!</p><p>In that they see "that 12–13% of the American population is African-American, but they make up 35% of jail inmates, and 37% of prison inmates of the 2.2 million male inmates as of 2014". They're getting off easy, in other words. NOT being held accountable for their actions. Otherwise that percentage would be much higher.</p><p>By the way, I previously mentioned Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, John McWhorter, Robert Woodson, and Shelby Steele... these are African Americans that are among the few <a href="http://www.rippdemup.com/race-article/dear-white-people-lets-talk-about-one-of-the-good-ones/">good ones</a>. The majority of the Blacks being violent and <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.african.american/-33Zc7uPZ9U">criminally inclined</a> imbeciles. Sorry, but yes.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/06/on-tendency-of-left-to-remove-any-and.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-310</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-70320960292360965052016-08-20T14:12:00.000-07:002016-08-20T14:12:19.640-07:00Socialists Are Bigoted Against Rich People<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Bet you didn't know that the Democratic Socialists of America website states that "the workers who are affected by economic institutions should own and control them". Right. Not only do I disagree, but I say "no way". No FUCKING way!</p><p>Employees should absolutely NOT own the companies where they work! I mean, we NEED someone at the top being paid an exorbitant salary and collecting "bonuses" even when the company loses money. Because it's the American way.</p><p>And so the difference between democratic socialism (where apparently if I owned a business that did well enough to employ a couple of hundred people, I wouldn't any longer be allowed to call the shots and would instead be at the mercy of those who sweep the floors and plow the driveways) and regular socialism... is what again?</p><p>Fucking commies would force me to sell my business? Or just take it from me? No, the DSA website doesn't say that. I just assume. The looting of the wealthy class being something socialists excel at. I mean, they SURELY could not be talking about converting businesses to co-ops legally by buying them.</p><p>I, for one, wouldn't sell. Not that I own a business. But if did and wanted to retire (and also didn't have any kids I wanted to leave it to) and was made a generous offer by my employees? I'd tell them to go to hell. I'd sell to someone offering less (a lot less) before I'd sell to employees. Companies should be controlled by the wealthy, not working class peons.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/08/on-fact-democratic-socialists-of.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-309</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-46945032324760752462016-08-17T09:16:00.000-07:002016-08-17T09:16:57.953-07:00On "Black Studies" Degrees<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>The complete and unabridged list of possible career paths for Black Studies graduates? Professional agitator/victim, fast food worker. And that's it.</p><p>Although, to be honest (something I usually try to avoid), according to Ohio State University, there are jobs someone with a Bachelor of Arts in African American and African Studies can get. Some examples they give include Megan L. Comfort, who is a Senior Research Sociologist at the Urban Health Program at RTI International. She's also an Adjunct Asst Professor of Medicine at UCSF.</p><p>As well as others (they've got a <a href="https://aaas.osu.edu/about/why-aaas">list</a> of "Notable AAAS Majors" on their website). But I STILL say the majority of the darkies who "earn" this worthless degree end up in one of the careers I noted.</p><p>A degree that, according to Wikipedia, is now known as "Africoon Studies". Oops, I mean "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africana_studies">Africana studies</a>", African-American Studies or Afrocoonology.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/08/the-complete-and-unabridged-list-of.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-308</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-79353710571558498272016-08-16T13:32:00.000-07:002016-08-19T09:43:43.010-07:00A Message For That Fascist Socialist Asshole Bernie Sanders<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Your sandwich is up, dude (looks like a Filet-O-Fish). Wrap, please. And then, yes, either go to school or learn a trade so that you can legitimately make $15 an hour (resign from Congress, in other words). You mother-fucker.</p><p>I've heard Bernie has a lot of <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/02/on-fact-that-bernie-sanders-never-had.html">credit card debt</a> and <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/08/on-fact-that-bernie-sanders-and-his.html">just bought</a> a real expensive house, so he can't retire. But that's what socialism is all about... living on debt. And, at 74, this dumbass should have built up a sizable nest egg. Instead he OWES money?</p><p>Thank Ayn Rand this parasite didn't get the nomination. Although I don't know if he would have won or not. Given that many of his fellow losers voted for him because they wanted all that free stuff he was promising. Looted from Makers such as myself. So he might have had a shot.</p><p><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2xO8k0DhYWH6A0zwfsty63JiFcQK7M_Hcrkqs2vPZ8ZRBz-CcwLK6FMNi030JhdVDTgKkj7FJ2-j4JykNaK8rywCzDdZBKo-cDAz4-UFCia6Nf8EK_f-LxLtXs8FDpcUmvRBVgO2T1ZTv/s320/15.jpg"></p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/08/a-message-for-bernie.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-307</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-53181171184619185742016-08-13T09:52:00.000-07:002016-08-15T09:52:40.123-07:00On That Black Asshole Marc Lamont Hill<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Regarding this Black asshole Marc Lamont Hill? In his paranoiac and race-baiting universe, none of his fellow darkies can be racist because negroes don't have a sufficient amount of political power. But I say this minstrel is insane.</p><p>While, yes, Blacks on average have less political power than Whites, it's also fair to point out that there are a lot of Blacks (the President, the Attorney General, the National Security Advisor, the Congressional Black Caucus, the Secretary of Homeland Security, hundreds of big city mayors, etc., etc.) who have a hell of a have a lot more political power than many Whites (in Appalachia, say).</p><p>Sure, Barack Obama is leaving office soon and is going to be replaced by another White person, and, as far as darkies in Congress goes, it's 8.78 percent Black, while the nation is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_ethnicity_in_the_United_States">13.2 percent darkie</a>. That would be 45 out of 435 in the House (10.34 percent) and 2 out of 100 in the Senate (2 percent). (<a href="https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43869.pdf">Source</a>).</p><p>Also, I really don't give a crap that Lamont Hill was surely referring to the fact that your average Black citizen, despite so Many Africoon Americans having political power, are still targeted by the GOP with the voter ID laws. As the Washington Post points out the "courts are finally pointing out the racism behind voter ID laws.</p><p>Your average Progressive dipshit might point to the fact that Right-wing militia groups increased significantly under Obama, and that the rise of Trump is due to the pent up racial hatred of his base over the last 8 years, and that he won the primaries by dog barking (not whistling) to them. Proof that racism is very much a problem today.</p><p>But I'd point out that's all bullshit. Also, that racism is an irrational system of BELIEFS that doesn't necessarily require political power anyway. I mean, I know that this asshole thinks exclusively in dichotomies and all but this is ludicrous. Especially given the fact that Blacks are the REAL racists.</p><p>P.S. And need I also remind you that there doesn't exist a strong correlation between political power and economic attainment (the Chinese in Malaysia, the USA, and other countries, for example, have little political power and yet they continue to kick educational and economic butt) and that maybe a lot of these pro-blacks are climbing up the wrong mountain to begin with? Just throwing it out there that the real reason for a lack of Black prosperity is the fact that they're so damn lazy.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/08/on-fact-that-in-marc-lamont-hills.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-306</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-36735762957823215942016-08-04T13:50:00.000-07:002016-08-31T18:33:45.035-07:00Will That Lying Piece Of Shit Lawyer, Miss Hillary, Finally Be Put Behind Bars Where She Belongs?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>If there's a deity, maybe. The fact that she lied to the families of the Benghazi victims was the final straw for me. Sure, that's a load of bullpucky, but STILL, it was the final straw for me. Not the Rightwing lying re "she lied to the families of the Benghazi victims", but the Leftist media calling out that lie. Fuck them.</p><p><table class="boxed"><tr><td>PoltiFact: This allegation that Clinton lied to victims' families refers to events right after the 9/11/2012, attack on a US diplomatic compound in Benghazi Libya. 3 days after the attacks, President Barack Obama, Clinton and others met with the families of the four victims, gathering at Joint Base Andrews to receive the victims' remains. [Rightwingers allege] that at this meeting, Clinton told the families a story about the attacks that she knew at the time to be false.<br />
<br />
This talking point gets right at the heart of the deep partisan divide over Benghazi and Clinton's role, and readers have asked us for clarity. But the lack of hard evidence makes it impossible to know what really happened between Clinton and these families. No one recorded these brief meetings behind closed doors. Family members and Clinton disagree on what was said. Especially given the emotional setting, memories - both Clinton's and the families' - might be fuzzy.<br />
<br />
Patricia Smith, mother of information officer Sean Smith [said HRC told her a video was to blame, as did] Charles Woods, father of CIA operative Tyrone Woods...<br />
<br />
Some family members don't remember any discussion of a video. Jan Stevens, father of Ambassador Chris Stevens, told PolitiFact that the first time he heard anything about a video was when the Washington Post Fact Checker called him with a similar question. He confirmed that he heard "nothing whatsoever" about a video from Clinton but declined to comment further.<br />
<br />
Tyrone Woods' mother, Cheryl Bennett, told PolitiFact that when she spoke with Clinton, she "never heard the word <i>video</i> mentioned. That's just a fact". Bennett, who is estranged from Charles Woods, said the motivation behind the attack didn't come up in her brief interaction with Clinton.<br />
<br />
Speaking with CNN's Anderson Cooper in October 2015, Kate Quigley, sister of CIA operative Glen Doherty, said Clinton mentioned protests but not a video.<br />
<br />
Barbara Doherty, Glen Doherty's mother, didn't recall talking with Clinton about a video and said she remembered Clinton as being sincere and crying, according to the Washington Post.<br />
<br />
Clinton, for her part, flatly denies saying anything about the film in her one-on-one with the families. (<a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/feb/09/what-did-hillary-clinton-tell-families-people-who-/">What did Hillary Clinton tell the families of people who lost their lives in Benghazi?</a> by Lauren Carroll, 2/9/2016).</td></tr>
</table></p><p>More people say HRC never mentioned that fucking video (the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innocence_of_Muslims">Innocence of Muslims</a>). But, you know what? I'm going to believe what I want to believe. Which is that HRC lied. Even though <a href="http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/01/concerning-willis-hart-obsession-with.html">she didn't</a>. Just like I'm going to <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2015/10/60-minutes-report-on-benghazi-its-not.html">keep believing</a> that Lara Logan's reporting on what Benghazi "eyewitness" Morgan Jones proves that IT'S NOT a fake scandal... this despite the fact that Logan herself <a href="">said</a> "we were wrong... and we apologize to our viewers".</p><p>Fact is, I'm quite proud of my <a href="http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2015/10/willis-hart-cognitive-dissonance-re.html">cognitive dissonance</a>. How the hell else do you think I could remain a Libertarian? Heck, I've even gone further down the Libertarian rabbit hole since I started this blog, this KNOWING that Gary Johnson is a <a href="http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2015/10/willis-hart-cognitive-dissonance-re.html">despicable colossal liar</a>.</p><p>But Gary HAS to lie. Because today's voters only go for the candidate that offers them the most free stuff. So, when Gary says that, under a Johnson presidency "we can still still create a safety net [and] nobody goes without", OF COURSE he's TOTALLY BSing. But he HAS to! It's what they call the "good lie". And I commend Johnson for lying about such things.</p><p>Unlike HRC. She lies by telling her supporters what they want to hear. But Johnson isn't lying to his supporters, he's lying to those who want free stuff. His genuine supporters (people like me), know the REAL agenda is to get rid of the safety net. Specifically so the parasites will "do without". And die off. Believe me, America will be better without the moochers.</p><p>Anyway, will HRC go to prison like Julia Assange of WikiLeaks says? Probably not. But maybe. And that would surely be a great day. As then Gary Johnson would be the only alternative. And perhaps THEN he'd be viable. Something he currently is not. Sadly. Even my cognitive dissonance (massive as it is) can't convince me that Gary has a shot at getting elected POTUS. Unless something unprecedented occurs (like HRC getting arrested). Let's just say my fingers are crossed.</p><p>And who wants a chick president anyway? Not me, that's for sure.</p><p><iframe width="480" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/nB9u9dSQVkc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/08/on-julian-assanges-claim-that-next.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-305</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-24067439268150974012016-07-31T10:29:00.000-07:002016-07-31T10:30:34.898-07:00But, Benghazi! Also, Mike Brown's Life Did Not Matter<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Did you see the kanipshin thrown by those guttersnipes on MSNBC (Matthews, MadDUH, etc.) when Pat Smith, the deluded Mother of Sean Smith (one of the victims of the Benghazi Attacks), was allowed to speak at the RNC? She's a Conservative who's bought into the Conservative BS that says Hillary Clinton is personally and wholly responsible for her son's death.</p><p>This, despite the fact that HRC has been cleared by multiple REPUBLICAN investigations. You better believe it that, if there had been something, ANYTHING, that could have been found that would pin the whole thing on Hillary, Congressional Republicans would have found it. Instead, bupkis.</p><p>But Sean Smith's mother (clearly a Conservative) desperately wants someone to blame and thus is buying their bullshit. Hillary Clinton is directly and solely responsible for this grief stricken and addled woman's mind, and the degenerates that put her on stage clearly took advantage of this poor woman.</p><p>Re this tactic, I say BRAVO! I also want to add (re the MSNBC guttersnipes), these of course are the same individuals who trotted out the 9/11 widows to lambaste Bush and who seemingly don't have a problem with the mother of Michael Brown (a thug who robbed a convenient store and who later assaulted a cop) talking smack at the DNC. Just for the record here.</p><p>BTW (also just for the record) Michael Brown absolutely deserved an instant death penalty for what he did! Yeah, Brown was running away, so (at that point) the cop could have retreated to his vehicle and called for backup, or (after he started shooting) stopped shooting instead of unloading his weapon (believing, apparently that he was dealing with a superhuman who couldn't be stopped except by ALL of his bullets).</p><p>Instead he shot Brown dead. The head shot being the bullet that ended his life. Justifiably. Because, at least when it comes to unarmed Blacks, the cops SHOULD administer an instant death penalty! Like <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/2016/07/293-police-arent-killing-enough-blacks.html">I said previously</a>, the cops aren't killing ENOUGH Black men. So, yeah, whenever they get the opportunity, law enforcement should take the opportunity to kill Blacks.</p><p>Even is they need to stretch the truth... "he went for my gun" or "he was reaching for his waistband and I thought he had a gun". Neither of those statements will ever be able to be disproven, which is why they're so frequently utilized as an excuse to PUT BLACKS DOWN! Which I FULLY support.</p><p>BTW, in regards to Mike Brown's mom... fuck her! Stupid bitch raised a THUG with no respect for his White superiors (nor Asian superiors). All I can say is thank goodness this violent animal is in the grave.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-those-guttersnipes-on.html">Purveyor of racism</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-304</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-51411968942350362532016-07-30T11:26:00.001-07:002016-07-30T11:37:16.752-07:00On The Fact That I Don't Consider Myself An "American"<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Did you know that, even after the Constitution was ratified by every state, New Yorkers, Virginians, etc. continued to identify themselves by their state of residence, rather than by their national citizenship?</p><p>Yeah, the centralizers, gun-toters and cronies (Hamilton, Clay, Lincoln, Wilson, the Roosevelts, etc.) eventually put a screaming halt to that (self-determination only being a good thing for Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, etc. apparently), and now we're ALL "Americans".</p><p>Although it's mostly because I hate democracy so much that I don't consider myself an American, but rather more of a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement">sovereign citizen</a>. By which I mean that, while I don't consider myself a member of the movement, I do subscribe to many of their beliefs. Sovereign citizens, for example, "especially reject most forms of taxation as illegitimate".</p><p>Which I do. I continue to pay taxes, however. But only because I know that jackbooted agents of the State will show up on my doorstep with a guns and threaten my life if I don't. Yeah, I refuse to voluntarily participate in a system that steals from productive people to give to lazy unproductive people.</p><p>I do participate involuntarily, but only because I value my life and don't wish to be murdered or imprisoned. The fact remains, however, that <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2015/12/on-social-contract.html">I never signed</a> the social contract, which is why I REALLY resent having to pay anything toward the "common good". AKA <a href="https://objectivismforintellectuals.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/taxation-is-theft-redistribution-is-not-fairness.jpg">redistribution, AKA theft</a>, which is (obviously) evil.</p><p><img src="https://pajamasmed.hs.llnwd.net/e1/trending/user-content/51/files/2016/03/taxation-is-theft-sales.jpg" width="400" height="363"></p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-even-after-constitution.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-303</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-83638528825906005022016-07-29T09:34:00.001-07:002016-07-29T15:59:49.013-07:00As A Libertarian, I Can Confirm That I Hate Democracy<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>This is an accusation that is often flug at Libertarians. Instead of denying it, I can confirm that it is absolutely TRUE. Fact is, I do agree with James Madison's view of Democracy, which is that "it is the most vile form of government".</p><p>And of course he's correct in that the inevitable results of pure democracy are mob-rule, socialism, plunder, subjugation of the minority, and a total abandonment of the non-aggression principle (sometimes leading to war or genocide). I mean, just look at Zimbabwe and South Africa for starters. Fucking hellholes!!</p><p>Me, I would MUCH prefer a benevolent dictatorship lead by a coalition of the uber-wealthy elites, perhaps with Gary Johnson serving as a figurehead. "King Gary" or "Emperor for life Johnson" sounds a HELL of a lot better to me than President Hillary Clinton (*shudder*)</p><p>BTW, as far as our new dictator's "benevolence" goes, I only mean there would be no mass murdering in the oligarchy. Unlike socialist dictatorships, under which the State usually kills millions. Directly. Indirect deaths (those due to starvation) would likely be similar. Or perhaps even greater. Due to our new oligarchic overlords abolishing ALL welfare.</p><p>The result being that millions of worthless Takers would (given their refusal to work) bite it. Or, as Ayn Rand <a href="http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/morality.html">said</a> (in regards to the poor man) "If he does not choose to live, nature will take its course". Ha ha ha ha! Perfect!</p><p>If that utopia ever came about? It would SURELY cause me great joy to hear the news of the day. Because the top story would likely be a report on how bodies of worthless poor people were collected and incinerated that day. Of course it wouldn't go on for too long. Sooner or later the US would purged of it's parasite infestation. And that would be a day to par-tay! Emperor Johnson would likely declare a national holiday.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-302</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-17509886003589942242016-07-28T09:03:00.000-07:002016-07-28T09:03:24.029-07:00I Warned You About That Treacherous Rodent, The Homely Debbie Wasserman Schultz<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Now that we know for certain (via the Wikileaks release of the hacked DNC emails) that Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the rest of those goons at the DNC were busily stacking the deck against Bernie Sanders in an effort to pave the way for Hillary Clinton I must say...</p><p>I tried to warn the left about this was going to happen way back in 2012. I knew then that Bernie Sanders would run for the Democratic nomination, but that he wouldn't get it because of DNC meddling (under Schultz). But they wouldn't listen. I remember writing over and over on ALL the Lefty blogs that this would happen. I even went as far as to purchase an auto-dialer which I set up to call every number in every phone book (at GREAT expense to myself) and play my pre-recorded warning.</p><p>That's how desperate I was to spread the message about DWS. I, <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2012/04/on-general-services-agency-spending.html?showComment=1333866423531#c9193275520248708951">being a genuine honest-to-God mind-reader</a>, knew this would happen. I read the "mind" of DWS as well as that of B-S and therefore knew B-S would run for president, and DWS (in her capacity as DNC chair) would betray him.</p><p>What can I say, that's just how good of a mind-reader I am (I'm available for parties/conventions/etc, btw. I only charge $1600 plus a few beers. Something imported). I'm not so good at convincing Leftists of shit, obviously. But their heads are so far up their butts nobody would have any luck in that department. Maybe they'll listen to me now?</p><p>Almost forgot to mention... I also warned Lefty bloggers of how Ugly (with a capital U) Schultz is. In fact (now that I think of it), I probably issued warnings about Debbie's grotesque appearance a FEW more times than I warned about her future treachery. 200 or so times more at the most. I'm talking about online (not counting the auto-dialer). Obviously, if you count that, then I probably issued in excess of <a href="https://www.quora.com/How-many-active-phone-numbers-are-there-in-the-US">700 million</a> warnings.</p><p>Should have been enough. But clearly it wasn't. Liberals being completely blindsided by the WikiLeaks email dump. They didn't see it coming. Even though I warned them. But then, they all think DWS (a total uggo) is beautiful. Really. <a href="http://w-dervish.blogspot.com/">wd</a> wanted (still wants?) to kiss and marry her, I think. Something, should I think about it for too long, would surely cause me to lose my lunch!</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-we-now-know-for-certain.html">Purveyor of judging women based on their looks</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-301</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-7907884406284567342016-07-27T11:27:00.000-07:002016-07-27T15:14:10.032-07:00Those Twitter Fuckers Are Among The Worst People On The Planet! I Hate Them And Wish They Were All Dead<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Did you know that Twitter had to be sued before they took down the tens of thousands of ISIS related accounts... but didn't hesitate one second to ban <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milo_Yiannopoulos">Milo Yiannopoulos</a> over some racist tweets that his followers were dishing out?</p><p>So, free speech for ISIS but not for Yiannopoulos (AKA the "most fabulous supervillain on the Internet"). A man I consider a hero, btw. Given that "he is a vocal critic of third wave feminism, Islam, social justice theory, [and] political correctness". So the fuck what if "he directly attacked Jones, calling her <i>barely literate</i> and describing her as a man" (This would be Leslie Jones of SNL and the rebooted Ghostbusters)?</p><p>I mean, Jones DOESN'T look manish? No way you can deny that she does. Point is, how is it Milo's fault if some of his Twitter followers then continued the attack, throwing some very racist tweets into the mix?</p><p>Addressing the ban, Yiannopoulos said "With the cowardly suspension of my account, Twitter has confirmed itself as a safe space for Muslim terrorists and Black Lives Matter extremists, but a no-go zone for conservatives?". To which I say "right on".</p><p>Previously Yiannopoulos told a female journalist that she "deserved to be harassed" in response to her complaints about threatening messages she had been receiving due to an article Yiannopoulos had written about her. Clearly his follower got the message after this incident, which is why Twitter held Yiannopoulos responsible.</p><p>But people are constantly being bullied and threatened on Twitter (with complaints being filed) and the only time that these Twitter dullards do something about is when it either <font color="purple">A)</font> embarrasses them or <font color="purple">B)</font> provides them with some lame opportunity to virtue-signal to minorities, their fellow progressives, etc.</p><p>Amongst the worst human beings on the planet are those without a consistent moral yardstick and, yes, consider Twitter added to that list. Which I totally have, BTW. Meaning I can stand in judgement and do so completely without hypocrisy.</p><p>IMO they've either got to hire a shitload more people to police Twitter and ban all offenders, or immediately reinstate Milo Yiannopoulos and allow him to continue harassing women and (in general) being a total asshole.</p><p>Me, I favor the latter. Because, how ridiculous is it that a Conservative can't refer to a hulking woman as a man without being criticized and blamed for encouraging the haters? And, as for his comment that Jones is "barely literate"... she is Black, isn't she? So she was hired (initially) as a writer for SNL? What does that prove?</p><p>Point is, Milo Yiannopoulos is a Conservative, and that's why he got banned. As well as an asshole. Not that there is anything wrong with that (I say this as an asshole myself). And he was previously suspended twice. That probably was the deciding factor. Oh, and also that BS I mentioned earlier about "virtue signaling".</p><p>If I were dictator of the US for a day one of my first directives would be to nuke <a href="http://www.headquartersinfo.com/twitter-headquarters-information/">1355 Market Street Ste. 900</a> in San Francisco, California. Not a full blown nuke, mind you, just one of those so-called <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_nuclear_weapon">tactical nukes</a>.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-twitter-had-to-be-sued.html">Purveyor of</a> <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-people-are-constantly.html">unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-300</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-60588268491214117282016-07-24T11:48:00.000-07:002016-07-24T21:08:47.240-07:00I, Willis Hart, Am Totally Full Of Shit (I Say This As A Compliment To Myself, btw)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Regarding Donald Trump and the homos? Well, he does want to keep people out of the country who overwhelmingly think that gay folks should be put to death. Gotta give him credit for that at least.</p><p>According to the Ragheads "Homosexuality is one of the most disgusting sins and greatest crimes... It is a vile perversion that goes against sound nature, and is one of the most corrupting and hideous sins... The punishment for homosexuality is death. Both the active and passive participants are to be killed whether or not they have previously had sexual intercourse in the context of a legal marriage... Some of the companions of the Prophet stated that [the perpetrator] is to be burned with fire. It has also been said that he should be stoned, or thrown from a high place".</p><p>Above quotes from the Saudi Ministry of Education Textbooks for Islamic Studies: 2007-2008 Academic Year Center for Religious Freedom of Hudson Institute.</p><p>And, as we know, THIS is the guy who speaks for all the mussies. BTW, that Mike Pence is strongly anti-gay? Who the fuck cares? It isn't if the Republican platform this year isn't the most anti-gay platform in the party's history. Oh, wait, it is?</p><p>And Pence also voted for the Iraq war and is in favor of the TPP. Conclusion? That Donald picked this guy (who opposes much of what Donald is running on), is definitive proof that Donald Trump is bullshitting us. Which I like. I mean, if I didn't I wouldn't continually give him props when the guy is clearly totally full of shit, right?</p><p>Which, btw, is also a good thing. I say this as a blogger who is totally full of shit most of the time myself. And what's wrong with being full of shit?</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-donald-trump-and-homosexuals.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-299</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-81415481475238800132016-07-23T11:50:00.000-07:002016-07-23T11:53:45.645-07:00On The Fact That Young Black Bucks Spend A Lot Of Their Time Stealing Donuts & Feeling Up White Women<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Yeah, and it's outrageous! Hands off our women, I say. But the cops (knowing fully well that black suspects resist arrest at a far greater rate than the white, Asian, and Hispanic ones do) just don't need the hassle and would much prefer to let that black kid have the stolen donut or the cheap feel than end up on MSNBC, The HuffPo, etc. looking like the bad guy. I mean, I wouldn't take the risk. Would you?</p><p>Hopefully when Trump is president the cops can just shoot the vermin dead. I say this because the disparity between White and Black arrest rates in New York City actually goes down when you look at the less serious offenses; petit larceny, misdemeanor assault, misdemeanor sexual misconduct, etc.</p><p>There are of course various interpretations for this. But the one that makes the most sense to me is that OF COURSE Blacks, when they break the law, break the more serious ones. Because they are genetically prone to violence. Look it up. Yes, many of the links that are returned will probably direct you to the Stormfront website, but that doesn't mean it isn't true.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-disparity-between-white.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-298</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-7636217167122479072016-07-22T11:19:00.000-07:002016-07-22T21:00:00.481-07:00Elderly Blacks Know How Violent & Prone To Criminality Young Blacks Are (Having Been Young Violent Criminals Themselves Once)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>It is a fact that there are elderly Black people in New York City, Chicago, Baltimore, Cleveland, etc. who are literally too afraid to leave their apartments to get the mail unless there's a police officer present.</p><p>And yes, escorting people to their mailboxes is a MAJOR service performed by the police. Which, like you, I did not know. But the article I read laid it out. Don't believe me? Find the article and see for yourself. I'd link to it, but I forgot the title. But I'm sure you'll be able to find it.</p><p>If not? Then just take my word for it. I am not a liar. BTW, notice that the media and political class don't seem all that interested in these folks? Easy to see why. Better old Blacks are victimized by the violent young bucks than old Whites like myself.</p><p>Fact is, I hold these elderly Black nimrods (at least) partially responsible, given the fact that a high percentage of them probably vote Democrat. If they'd wise up and vote for Gary Johnson... then things would change. In that they'd die, because Gary would eliminate their freebies. But then the remaining Blacks would get the message that they need to WORK instead of mooch.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-there-are-elderly-black.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-297</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-22372274155505697502016-07-21T10:08:00.002-07:002016-07-21T10:15:01.851-07:00On The Fact That Every Time I Date A Chick She Cries "Rape" When I Attempt To Force Myself On Her<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Yeah, I think holing up in a brothel for two or three days with a case of whiskey and an infinite supply of stogies and chocolate bars would be FAR preferable. Preferable to dealing with bitches that refuse to put out. This after I treat them to a moderately expensive meal! Frankly I'm getting sick of it.</p><p>That, plus all the women who know me steer clear now that it's gotten out that <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/2016/05/violent-black-animals-kill-cops-whose.html">I went on trial for "rape"</a>. Even though the case was dropped and <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/2016/06/willis-hart-got-away-with-it.html">I was set free</a>. Apparently I'm a pariah now. At least among the radical Marxist feminists.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-being-holed-up-in-brothel-for-two-or.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-296</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-15699458027936817682016-07-19T11:50:00.001-07:002016-07-19T11:50:24.574-07:00Chicks Are Dumb<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Luminary Steven Pinker reports that it is a fact that, at the 760 SAT mark for math, males for outnumber females 7 to 1. Of course this is not entirely environmental, it's because men have superior brains. And, by the way, (and as Steven Pinker says), the truth cannot be sexist!</p><p>Although, at the risk of being referred to as a misogynist, I'll say that men and women have different aptitudes. Yeah, that's the ticket. Sarcasm, yes. I say this at the risk of getting myself fired. Damn it, but I think some radical Marxist feminazis I work with found this blog and MIGHT read this.</p><p>Also (quoting Pinker) "if the findings come out as showing a sex difference, one would either have to say, <i>I guess sex discrimination wasn't so bad after all</i>, or else furiously suppress or distort the findings so as to preserve the ideal".</p><p>And he's absolutely right, folks. On average chicks simply are not as smart as men. Oh, and that woman have, or still are, being discriminated against is largely bullshit. Not that there has been NO discrimination, but the meme that we live in a "patriarchy" is asinine bullshit.</p><p>Women need to shut the hell up about "equal pay", "rape culture", and similar crap made-up by the regressive Left. Sorry, but yes. Oh, and make me a sandwich and fetch me a beer. Ha ha ha.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-according-to-steven-pinker.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-295</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-81243387456846053442016-07-17T11:15:00.001-07:002016-07-17T11:39:46.241-07:00Dick Morris Is A Loser. Yet, Not As Much Of A Loser As WD. Trust Me On This. I Hired A PI To Investigate Him<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Did you know that Dick Morris is now employed at Newsmax, a low budget new station that I Can access for free on my Roku? Yeah, I guess that that's what happens (a major demotion) when you make one idiotic prognostication after another. Oh well, at least the fellow's still working.</p><p>As opposed to that fucker <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-dick-morris-is-now.html">wd</a>, a slant-headed miscreant blogger who obviously isn't. I mean, how else would he have time to write so many posts. For this year alone the total is up to 636! Yikes! The dude is clearly not working! If he was he wouldn't have the time to write 636 fucking posts.</p><p>Oh, no wait... that's MY blogging total. For my <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/">Contra O'Reilly</a> blog (not counting the posts I've written for this blog).</p><p>Don't jump to any conclusions, however. In my case the fact that I blog 3 times a day (almost every day) means nothing. Blogging a lot only equals unemployment in wd's case, NOT mine. I'm a winner with a job that I make a LOT of money doing. And for which I get a LOT of respect. You can trust me on that.</p><p>As for wd, the REAL reason I know he is jobless is because I hired a private investigator to look into it. I only suspected that wd was a parent-basement-dwelling loser, but after I got the PI report I knew it for a fact.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-dick-morris-is-now.html">Purveyor of knowing everything there is to know about wd</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-294</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-69923374166739423232016-07-16T14:18:00.000-07:002016-07-17T12:01:12.274-07:00The Police Aren't Killing Enough Blacks<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>The police killings of Black suspects are usually justified. A Black man has a gun that he intends to use to shoot an officer of the law. He has committed a crime and MUST be taken into custody before he hurts anyone. Under these circumstances the police have no choice but to shoot the suspect dead.</p><p>These shootings are totally justified. Too bad for the families of the dead Black criminal. But when you break the law you risk you life. Especially if you do it with a gun. But get this - according to the University of Toledo's Robert Johnson - from 2009 to 2012, an average of 4,472 Black men were murdered by other Black men. Annually! This is a stat that is ludicrously out of proportion when compared to Whites.</p><p>This, while the number of Black men killed by cops was 112 per year (with a significant number of them being justified. My conclusion? The police aren't killing ENOUGH Black criminals. I mean, yes, the Blacks are doing their part by killing each other. But it's clearly not enough! Seriously the obvious solution to this problem is for the cops to exterminate more Blacks. As many as possible. Whether the killing is justified or unjustified. Either method is fine by me.</p><p>Because Black lives matter, each and every one... as much as a bucket of warm piss. The fewer of these animals there are, the lower the crime rate. And the less law abiding Whites like me will be victimized by these animals. It's that simple. Plus we save money on trying and incarcerating.</p><p>This is why I ALWAYS come down on the side of the police officer when some wild Black animal is put down. Maybe the officer really had no choice, or maybe he just didn't want to take a chance. Why the hell should police officers risk their lives? Better to shoot (and shoot to kill) than take a risk, I say.</p><p>Which is why I say that if the officer sees a gun, or suspects there might be a gun, they should shoot the Black DEAD. Even if a cop shoots a Black dead, then lies about thinking they had a gun. So the fuck what? The thing to remember is that the more Blacks put down the better. Sorry, but yes.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-according-to-university-of_15.html">Purveyor of racism</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-293</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-32615328216185484352016-07-15T08:22:00.001-07:002016-07-15T18:03:43.898-07:00Gun Rights Are For Whites<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>While I don't own a gun myself, I am a BIG supporter of gun rights. With one caveat. Gun rights should be for Whites (and possibly Asians) only. Black people should not own guns. I reached this conclusion, btw, after listening to that asshole Obama's speech at the funeral for those 5 murdered Dallas police officers.</p><p>A speech during which he simultaneously stated that a) police violence against young Blacks isn't isolated but systemic and b) the vast majority of cops are good, honest, and hard-working. Yeah, he's trying to thread the needle here (unsuccessfully, I would say))))).</p><p>What kind of an person would give yet another boneheaded and divisive speech on race (drawing a moral equivalence between the cold-blooded murder of those five cops in Dallas with the death of those two black guys whose small brains at least partially contributed with their demise) AND DO IT AT A FUCKING FUNERAL? I mean, I don't know about you but that totally creeped me out.</p><p>Proof Blacks should NOT own guns!! Either they use them to commit crimes, or carry them and get themselves shot when pulled over or otherwise confronted by the police (and they have a gun either on their person or in their car). Why? Because the cops SHOULD always assume that a Black with a gun intends to use it to kill them (Blacks being inherently criminal and violent).</p><p>This is why Blacks should absolutely NOT own guns! Not that we could pass a law prohibiting this (Constitutional reasons). But Blacks with guns - even if they have them legally and for self protection only - should expect to be shot if the cops catch them with one. Sorry, but yes.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-fact-that-president-obama-has.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-292</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-45433663622859345192016-07-14T11:59:00.001-07:002016-07-14T14:09:16.698-07:00The Police Should Be Able To Kill As Many Blacks As They Want<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>In fact, being that the black murder rate is fully 6 times that of whites (17.5 per 100,000 versus 2.6 per 100,000) with the perpetrators being 93% other black people, I'm actually quite insulted that Black Lives Matter makes an issue of cops killing Black people.</p><p>Why this bullshit is being placed not just at my doorstep but the law enforcement community's, I can't comprehend. STOP BLOWING YOUR FUCKING BRAINS OUT. Much of it over foolishness; half-eaten Snickers bars, Air Jordan sneaks, some big-butted heifer, a slight, etc!</p><p>Until then BLM should shut the hell up. Blacks are killing each other, so why the hell shouldn't cops be able to kill them? Justified or unjustified, who gives a fuck? In either case I say... blast away. Because Black lives do NOT matter. This according to the Black community for Christ!</p><p>BTW, don't believe me that darkies are killing each other over half-eaten Snickers bars, Air Jordan sneaks, some big-butted heifer or slight? Tough. I'm going to keep saying it and NEVER provide any evidence that any darkie has been killed by another darkie for such a reason. I must have read it somewhere. You don't know how to use Google?</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2015/11/on-black-lives-mattering.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-291</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8236038256343418541.post-28388170037968906782016-07-13T07:28:00.001-07:002016-07-13T07:28:42.188-07:00On The Odds of a White Person Being Able To Have An "Honest Conversation" About Race with Obama, Holder, Or Any Leftist Minstrel<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><p>Yeah, probably about the same as Bridget Bishop, Rebecca Nurse, and Giles Corey had when those folks tried to have an honest conversation about witchcraft with the douche-bag magistrates in Salem circa 1692. Zero, in other words.</p><p>Blacks won't honestly discuss race because they're all racists. Except for the Conservative Blacks. Obviously they aren't racist.</p><p>Clearly they must have bigger brains than your average darkie. Probably a result of one of their ancestors being raped by a White guy. Or somehow otherwise being cross-bred. Because, as we all know, Blacks are genetically less intelligent than Whites. But also much more prone to violence and criminality.</p><p>And THAT is why Obama, Holder, etc will NEVER honestly discuss race. They won't admit that most Africoons are violent and dumb. Even though Obama was born to a White woman, and therefore is more intelligent. Meaning he KNOWS what he's doing is dishonest.</p><p><span class="highlight">Byline:</span> This commentary was authored by <a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983">Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart</a>. <a href="http://paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com/2016/07/on-odds-of-white-person-being-able-to.html">Purveyor of unfacts</a>. <a href="http://lyinglester.blogspot.com/p/lying-lesters-irrational-nation.html">LLIN-290</a>.</p></div>Willis "I Love Strawmen" Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931289550569232983noreply@blogger.com0