Saturday, September 24, 2016

On CNN's Virtue Signaling Social Justice Warriors

I refer to CNN's post debate coverage Monday night (9/26/2016). Six people criticizing Trump (seven if you include the increasingly more and more difficult to stomach host, Anderson Cooper), two people defending the guy. So, no, not even remotely balanced. Though, yes, it was better than MSNBC, where even the Republican pundits - Steve Schmidt, Nicole Wallace - fall all over themselves in a rank effort to virtue-signal, be liked, etc.

They'll be sorry when Mr. Trump is in the White House. He'll have his revenge then, I'm sure. It's almost enough to make me root for Trump. But, yes, I'm still voting for Gary "what's Aleppo" Johnson.

Despite him having zero chance of being elected. I'm sticking to my principals and not voting for the lesser of two evils (I'm voting for the greater evil). Because I'm convinced that Gary Johnson would make the best president. In that he'd cater to the needs of the oligarchs the best.

BTW, why the hell wasn't Gary Johnson up on that debate stage? Trump is implying that (if he loses) that it will be because the election was rigged. But what about Gary Johnson? Is the election not rigged against him? But the elites knew that, if he had been allowed on the debate stage, he'd surely have mopped the floor with DJT and HRC.

And likely ended up our next president. But, given that he's getting no exposure? He can't win when people don't know who he is. Which is the point, of course. To suppress Gary's message of building up our oligarchs even more and crushing the poor and middle class even more than they are currently being crushed.

Although (to be completely honest, which in the past I haven't been) he cloaks that message in lies. Because the ignorant and stupid voters wouldn't like his real message (that they NEED to be crushed for the good of our oligarchs).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-312.

Thursday, September 8, 2016

My Favorite "Prussian Blue" Song?

It would have to be this one. A lyric from Aryan Man Awake says "and black masked men with guns come bashing down the doors"... which is something that I, as a White man, live in fear of.

Extreme fear that gives me the night sweats. So, while I don't own a gun, I'm not about to place a sign in my yard saying so. That would be an invitation for the black masked men to come bashing down my door. Darkies with names like Mookie, Ray-Ray, Dre and Slice. They, instead of working hard and earning what they have, want to steal from me.

Anyway, the Prussian Blue gals nail it in this song. Although I think someone else likely wrote the lyrics. In fact, according to the Prussian Blue Wikipedia page the sisters (fraternal twins born on 6/30/1992) they're now "laid-back liberals celebrating the joys of ethnic diversity".

What a shame. Although they apparently still believe that the Holocaust was exaggerated. Which, as I've pointed out on my other blog (Contra O'Reilly) is absolutely a fact (that Jew whiners inflate the numbers).

But there are no "joys" to ethnic diversity. Unless you think being attacked by a violent Black thug is "enjoyable". Which I do not. Still a great song though.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of racism. LLIN-311.

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

On The Fact That Most Blacks Are Incredibly Stupid (And YES, It's A Fact)

Did you know that the Left has the tendency to remove any and all moral agency from Black people? Probably not, I'd bet. But, to me, this is quite possibly the most insidious form of racism that exists! Why? Because the Left does it. Or so I say, regardless of whether or not it's true.

The Left would likely counter that it's the Right that has a tendency to remove any and all moral agency from the wealthy and corporations. Examples being the "affluenza" kid and Corporate killers getting off with mere fines (and with nobody getting jail time. Even when people are killed).

In any case, I cannot for the life of me understand why 80 to 90% of black people (those whose names aren't Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, John McWhorter, Robert Woodson, Shelby Steele, etc.) continue to put up with it. Seriously. They should come over to the Right where corporate criminals and rich people get all the breaks. The people who deserve them.

The only explanation I can come up with this that Blacks are incredibly stupid. Genetically, I mean. Also very much like little children (albeit incredibly violent and criminally inclined children). Explaining why the Left treats them like little children. But children can't grow up unless they're show that they are responsible for their actions!

In that they see "that 12–13% of the American population is African-American, but they make up 35% of jail inmates, and 37% of prison inmates of the 2.2 million male inmates as of 2014". They're getting off easy, in other words. NOT being held accountable for their actions. Otherwise that percentage would be much higher.

By the way, I previously mentioned Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, John McWhorter, Robert Woodson, and Shelby Steele... these are African Americans that are among the few good ones. The majority of the Blacks being violent and criminally inclined imbeciles. Sorry, but yes.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-310.

Saturday, August 20, 2016

Socialists Are Bigoted Against Rich People

Bet you didn't know that the Democratic Socialists of America website states that "the workers who are affected by economic institutions should own and control them". Right. Not only do I disagree, but I say "no way". No FUCKING way!

Employees should absolutely NOT own the companies where they work! I mean, we NEED someone at the top being paid an exorbitant salary and collecting "bonuses" even when the company loses money. Because it's the American way.

And so the difference between democratic socialism (where apparently if I owned a business that did well enough to employ a couple of hundred people, I wouldn't any longer be allowed to call the shots and would instead be at the mercy of those who sweep the floors and plow the driveways) and regular socialism... is what again?

Fucking commies would force me to sell my business? Or just take it from me? No, the DSA website doesn't say that. I just assume. The looting of the wealthy class being something socialists excel at. I mean, they SURELY could not be talking about converting businesses to co-ops legally by buying them.

I, for one, wouldn't sell. Not that I own a business. But if did and wanted to retire (and also didn't have any kids I wanted to leave it to) and was made a generous offer by my employees? I'd tell them to go to hell. I'd sell to someone offering less (a lot less) before I'd sell to employees. Companies should be controlled by the wealthy, not working class peons.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-309.

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

On "Black Studies" Degrees

The complete and unabridged list of possible career paths for Black Studies graduates? Professional agitator/victim, fast food worker. And that's it.

Although, to be honest (something I usually try to avoid), according to Ohio State University, there are jobs someone with a Bachelor of Arts in African American and African Studies can get. Some examples they give include Megan L. Comfort, who is a Senior Research Sociologist at the Urban Health Program at RTI International. She's also an Adjunct Asst Professor of Medicine at UCSF.

As well as others (they've got a list of "Notable AAAS Majors" on their website). But I STILL say the majority of the darkies who "earn" this worthless degree end up in one of the careers I noted.

A degree that, according to Wikipedia, is now known as "Africoon Studies". Oops, I mean "Africana studies", African-American Studies or Afrocoonology.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-308.

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

A Message For That Fascist Socialist Asshole Bernie Sanders

Your sandwich is up, dude (looks like a Filet-O-Fish). Wrap, please. And then, yes, either go to school or learn a trade so that you can legitimately make $15 an hour (resign from Congress, in other words). You mother-fucker.

I've heard Bernie has a lot of credit card debt and just bought a real expensive house, so he can't retire. But that's what socialism is all about... living on debt. And, at 74, this dumbass should have built up a sizable nest egg. Instead he OWES money?

Thank Ayn Rand this parasite didn't get the nomination. Although I don't know if he would have won or not. Given that many of his fellow losers voted for him because they wanted all that free stuff he was promising. Looted from Makers such as myself. So he might have had a shot.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-307.

Saturday, August 13, 2016

On That Black Asshole Marc Lamont Hill

Regarding this Black asshole Marc Lamont Hill? In his paranoiac and race-baiting universe, none of his fellow darkies can be racist because negroes don't have a sufficient amount of political power. But I say this minstrel is insane.

While, yes, Blacks on average have less political power than Whites, it's also fair to point out that there are a lot of Blacks (the President, the Attorney General, the National Security Advisor, the Congressional Black Caucus, the Secretary of Homeland Security, hundreds of big city mayors, etc., etc.) who have a hell of a have a lot more political power than many Whites (in Appalachia, say).

Sure, Barack Obama is leaving office soon and is going to be replaced by another White person, and, as far as darkies in Congress goes, it's 8.78 percent Black, while the nation is 13.2 percent darkie. That would be 45 out of 435 in the House (10.34 percent) and 2 out of 100 in the Senate (2 percent). (Source).

Also, I really don't give a crap that Lamont Hill was surely referring to the fact that your average Black citizen, despite so Many Africoon Americans having political power, are still targeted by the GOP with the voter ID laws. As the Washington Post points out the "courts are finally pointing out the racism behind voter ID laws.

Your average Progressive dipshit might point to the fact that Right-wing militia groups increased significantly under Obama, and that the rise of Trump is due to the pent up racial hatred of his base over the last 8 years, and that he won the primaries by dog barking (not whistling) to them. Proof that racism is very much a problem today.

But I'd point out that's all bullshit. Also, that racism is an irrational system of BELIEFS that doesn't necessarily require political power anyway. I mean, I know that this asshole thinks exclusively in dichotomies and all but this is ludicrous. Especially given the fact that Blacks are the REAL racists.

P.S. And need I also remind you that there doesn't exist a strong correlation between political power and economic attainment (the Chinese in Malaysia, the USA, and other countries, for example, have little political power and yet they continue to kick educational and economic butt) and that maybe a lot of these pro-blacks are climbing up the wrong mountain to begin with? Just throwing it out there that the real reason for a lack of Black prosperity is the fact that they're so damn lazy.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-306.

Thursday, August 4, 2016

Will That Lying Piece Of Shit Lawyer, Miss Hillary, Finally Be Put Behind Bars Where She Belongs?

If there's a deity, maybe. The fact that she lied to the families of the Benghazi victims was the final straw for me. Sure, that's a load of bullpucky, but STILL, it was the final straw for me. Not the Rightwing lying re "she lied to the families of the Benghazi victims", but the Leftist media calling out that lie. Fuck them.

PoltiFact: This allegation that Clinton lied to victims' families refers to events right after the 9/11/2012, attack on a US diplomatic compound in Benghazi Libya. 3 days after the attacks, President Barack Obama, Clinton and others met with the families of the four victims, gathering at Joint Base Andrews to receive the victims' remains. [Rightwingers allege] that at this meeting, Clinton told the families a story about the attacks that she knew at the time to be false.

This talking point gets right at the heart of the deep partisan divide over Benghazi and Clinton's role, and readers have asked us for clarity. But the lack of hard evidence makes it impossible to know what really happened between Clinton and these families. No one recorded these brief meetings behind closed doors. Family members and Clinton disagree on what was said. Especially given the emotional setting, memories - both Clinton's and the families' - might be fuzzy.

Patricia Smith, mother of information officer Sean Smith [said HRC told her a video was to blame, as did] Charles Woods, father of CIA operative Tyrone Woods...

Some family members don't remember any discussion of a video. Jan Stevens, father of Ambassador Chris Stevens, told PolitiFact that the first time he heard anything about a video was when the Washington Post Fact Checker called him with a similar question. He confirmed that he heard "nothing whatsoever" about a video from Clinton but declined to comment further.

Tyrone Woods' mother, Cheryl Bennett, told PolitiFact that when she spoke with Clinton, she "never heard the word video mentioned. That's just a fact". Bennett, who is estranged from Charles Woods, said the motivation behind the attack didn't come up in her brief interaction with Clinton.

Speaking with CNN's Anderson Cooper in October 2015, Kate Quigley, sister of CIA operative Glen Doherty, said Clinton mentioned protests but not a video.

Barbara Doherty, Glen Doherty's mother, didn't recall talking with Clinton about a video and said she remembered Clinton as being sincere and crying, according to the Washington Post.

Clinton, for her part, flatly denies saying anything about the film in her one-on-one with the families. (What did Hillary Clinton tell the families of people who lost their lives in Benghazi? by Lauren Carroll, 2/9/2016).

More people say HRC never mentioned that fucking video (the Innocence of Muslims). But, you know what? I'm going to believe what I want to believe. Which is that HRC lied. Even though she didn't. Just like I'm going to keep believing that Lara Logan's reporting on what Benghazi "eyewitness" Morgan Jones proves that IT'S NOT a fake scandal... this despite the fact that Logan herself said "we were wrong... and we apologize to our viewers".

Fact is, I'm quite proud of my cognitive dissonance. How the hell else do you think I could remain a Libertarian? Heck, I've even gone further down the Libertarian rabbit hole since I started this blog, this KNOWING that Gary Johnson is a despicable colossal liar.

But Gary HAS to lie. Because today's voters only go for the candidate that offers them the most free stuff. So, when Gary says that, under a Johnson presidency "we can still still create a safety net [and] nobody goes without", OF COURSE he's TOTALLY BSing. But he HAS to! It's what they call the "good lie". And I commend Johnson for lying about such things.

Unlike HRC. She lies by telling her supporters what they want to hear. But Johnson isn't lying to his supporters, he's lying to those who want free stuff. His genuine supporters (people like me), know the REAL agenda is to get rid of the safety net. Specifically so the parasites will "do without". And die off. Believe me, America will be better without the moochers.

Anyway, will HRC go to prison like Julia Assange of WikiLeaks says? Probably not. But maybe. And that would surely be a great day. As then Gary Johnson would be the only alternative. And perhaps THEN he'd be viable. Something he currently is not. Sadly. Even my cognitive dissonance (massive as it is) can't convince me that Gary has a shot at getting elected POTUS. Unless something unprecedented occurs (like HRC getting arrested). Let's just say my fingers are crossed.

And who wants a chick president anyway? Not me, that's for sure.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-305.

Sunday, July 31, 2016

But, Benghazi! Also, Mike Brown's Life Did Not Matter

Did you see the kanipshin thrown by those guttersnipes on MSNBC (Matthews, MadDUH, etc.) when Pat Smith, the deluded Mother of Sean Smith (one of the victims of the Benghazi Attacks), was allowed to speak at the RNC? She's a Conservative who's bought into the Conservative BS that says Hillary Clinton is personally and wholly responsible for her son's death.

This, despite the fact that HRC has been cleared by multiple REPUBLICAN investigations. You better believe it that, if there had been something, ANYTHING, that could have been found that would pin the whole thing on Hillary, Congressional Republicans would have found it. Instead, bupkis.

But Sean Smith's mother (clearly a Conservative) desperately wants someone to blame and thus is buying their bullshit. Hillary Clinton is directly and solely responsible for this grief stricken and addled woman's mind, and the degenerates that put her on stage clearly took advantage of this poor woman.

Re this tactic, I say BRAVO! I also want to add (re the MSNBC guttersnipes), these of course are the same individuals who trotted out the 9/11 widows to lambaste Bush and who seemingly don't have a problem with the mother of Michael Brown (a thug who robbed a convenient store and who later assaulted a cop) talking smack at the DNC. Just for the record here.

BTW (also just for the record) Michael Brown absolutely deserved an instant death penalty for what he did! Yeah, Brown was running away, so (at that point) the cop could have retreated to his vehicle and called for backup, or (after he started shooting) stopped shooting instead of unloading his weapon (believing, apparently that he was dealing with a superhuman who couldn't be stopped except by ALL of his bullets).

Instead he shot Brown dead. The head shot being the bullet that ended his life. Justifiably. Because, at least when it comes to unarmed Blacks, the cops SHOULD administer an instant death penalty! Like I said previously, the cops aren't killing ENOUGH Black men. So, yeah, whenever they get the opportunity, law enforcement should take the opportunity to kill Blacks.

Even is they need to stretch the truth... "he went for my gun" or "he was reaching for his waistband and I thought he had a gun". Neither of those statements will ever be able to be disproven, which is why they're so frequently utilized as an excuse to PUT BLACKS DOWN! Which I FULLY support.

BTW, in regards to Mike Brown's mom... fuck her! Stupid bitch raised a THUG with no respect for his White superiors (nor Asian superiors). All I can say is thank goodness this violent animal is in the grave.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of racism. LLIN-304.

Saturday, July 30, 2016

On The Fact That I Don't Consider Myself An "American"

Did you know that, even after the Constitution was ratified by every state, New Yorkers, Virginians, etc. continued to identify themselves by their state of residence, rather than by their national citizenship?

Yeah, the centralizers, gun-toters and cronies (Hamilton, Clay, Lincoln, Wilson, the Roosevelts, etc.) eventually put a screaming halt to that (self-determination only being a good thing for Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, etc. apparently), and now we're ALL "Americans".

Although it's mostly because I hate democracy so much that I don't consider myself an American, but rather more of a sovereign citizen. By which I mean that, while I don't consider myself a member of the movement, I do subscribe to many of their beliefs. Sovereign citizens, for example, "especially reject most forms of taxation as illegitimate".

Which I do. I continue to pay taxes, however. But only because I know that jackbooted agents of the State will show up on my doorstep with a guns and threaten my life if I don't. Yeah, I refuse to voluntarily participate in a system that steals from productive people to give to lazy unproductive people.

I do participate involuntarily, but only because I value my life and don't wish to be murdered or imprisoned. The fact remains, however, that I never signed the social contract, which is why I REALLY resent having to pay anything toward the "common good". AKA redistribution, AKA theft, which is (obviously) evil.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-303.

Friday, July 29, 2016

As A Libertarian, I Can Confirm That I Hate Democracy

This is an accusation that is often flug at Libertarians. Instead of denying it, I can confirm that it is absolutely TRUE. Fact is, I do agree with James Madison's view of Democracy, which is that "it is the most vile form of government".

And of course he's correct in that the inevitable results of pure democracy are mob-rule, socialism, plunder, subjugation of the minority, and a total abandonment of the non-aggression principle (sometimes leading to war or genocide). I mean, just look at Zimbabwe and South Africa for starters. Fucking hellholes!!

Me, I would MUCH prefer a benevolent dictatorship lead by a coalition of the uber-wealthy elites, perhaps with Gary Johnson serving as a figurehead. "King Gary" or "Emperor for life Johnson" sounds a HELL of a lot better to me than President Hillary Clinton (*shudder*)

BTW, as far as our new dictator's "benevolence" goes, I only mean there would be no mass murdering in the oligarchy. Unlike socialist dictatorships, under which the State usually kills millions. Directly. Indirect deaths (those due to starvation) would likely be similar. Or perhaps even greater. Due to our new oligarchic overlords abolishing ALL welfare.

The result being that millions of worthless Takers would (given their refusal to work) bite it. Or, as Ayn Rand said (in regards to the poor man) "If he does not choose to live, nature will take its course". Ha ha ha ha! Perfect!

If that utopia ever came about? It would SURELY cause me great joy to hear the news of the day. Because the top story would likely be a report on how bodies of worthless poor people were collected and incinerated that day. Of course it wouldn't go on for too long. Sooner or later the US would purged of it's parasite infestation. And that would be a day to par-tay! Emperor Johnson would likely declare a national holiday.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-302.

Thursday, July 28, 2016

I Warned You About That Treacherous Rodent, The Homely Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Now that we know for certain (via the Wikileaks release of the hacked DNC emails) that Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the rest of those goons at the DNC were busily stacking the deck against Bernie Sanders in an effort to pave the way for Hillary Clinton I must say...

I tried to warn the left about this was going to happen way back in 2012. I knew then that Bernie Sanders would run for the Democratic nomination, but that he wouldn't get it because of DNC meddling (under Schultz). But they wouldn't listen. I remember writing over and over on ALL the Lefty blogs that this would happen. I even went as far as to purchase an auto-dialer which I set up to call every number in every phone book (at GREAT expense to myself) and play my pre-recorded warning.

That's how desperate I was to spread the message about DWS. I, being a genuine honest-to-God mind-reader, knew this would happen. I read the "mind" of DWS as well as that of B-S and therefore knew B-S would run for president, and DWS (in her capacity as DNC chair) would betray him.

What can I say, that's just how good of a mind-reader I am (I'm available for parties/conventions/etc, btw. I only charge $1600 plus a few beers. Something imported). I'm not so good at convincing Leftists of shit, obviously. But their heads are so far up their butts nobody would have any luck in that department. Maybe they'll listen to me now?

Almost forgot to mention... I also warned Lefty bloggers of how Ugly (with a capital U) Schultz is. In fact (now that I think of it), I probably issued warnings about Debbie's grotesque appearance a FEW more times than I warned about her future treachery. 200 or so times more at the most. I'm talking about online (not counting the auto-dialer). Obviously, if you count that, then I probably issued in excess of 700 million warnings.

Should have been enough. But clearly it wasn't. Liberals being completely blindsided by the WikiLeaks email dump. They didn't see it coming. Even though I warned them. But then, they all think DWS (a total uggo) is beautiful. Really. wd wanted (still wants?) to kiss and marry her, I think. Something, should I think about it for too long, would surely cause me to lose my lunch!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of judging women based on their looks. LLIN-301.

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Those Twitter Fuckers Are Among The Worst People On The Planet! I Hate Them And Wish They Were All Dead

Did you know that Twitter had to be sued before they took down the tens of thousands of ISIS related accounts... but didn't hesitate one second to ban Milo Yiannopoulos over some racist tweets that his followers were dishing out?

So, free speech for ISIS but not for Yiannopoulos (AKA the "most fabulous supervillain on the Internet"). A man I consider a hero, btw. Given that "he is a vocal critic of third wave feminism, Islam, social justice theory, [and] political correctness". So the fuck what if "he directly attacked Jones, calling her barely literate and describing her as a man" (This would be Leslie Jones of SNL and the rebooted Ghostbusters)?

I mean, Jones DOESN'T look manish? No way you can deny that she does. Point is, how is it Milo's fault if some of his Twitter followers then continued the attack, throwing some very racist tweets into the mix?

Addressing the ban, Yiannopoulos said "With the cowardly suspension of my account, Twitter has confirmed itself as a safe space for Muslim terrorists and Black Lives Matter extremists, but a no-go zone for conservatives?". To which I say "right on".

Previously Yiannopoulos told a female journalist that she "deserved to be harassed" in response to her complaints about threatening messages she had been receiving due to an article Yiannopoulos had written about her. Clearly his follower got the message after this incident, which is why Twitter held Yiannopoulos responsible.

But people are constantly being bullied and threatened on Twitter (with complaints being filed) and the only time that these Twitter dullards do something about is when it either A) embarrasses them or B) provides them with some lame opportunity to virtue-signal to minorities, their fellow progressives, etc.

Amongst the worst human beings on the planet are those without a consistent moral yardstick and, yes, consider Twitter added to that list. Which I totally have, BTW. Meaning I can stand in judgement and do so completely without hypocrisy.

IMO they've either got to hire a shitload more people to police Twitter and ban all offenders, or immediately reinstate Milo Yiannopoulos and allow him to continue harassing women and (in general) being a total asshole.

Me, I favor the latter. Because, how ridiculous is it that a Conservative can't refer to a hulking woman as a man without being criticized and blamed for encouraging the haters? And, as for his comment that Jones is "barely literate"... she is Black, isn't she? So she was hired (initially) as a writer for SNL? What does that prove?

Point is, Milo Yiannopoulos is a Conservative, and that's why he got banned. As well as an asshole. Not that there is anything wrong with that (I say this as an asshole myself). And he was previously suspended twice. That probably was the deciding factor. Oh, and also that BS I mentioned earlier about "virtue signaling".

If I were dictator of the US for a day one of my first directives would be to nuke 1355 Market Street Ste. 900 in San Francisco, California. Not a full blown nuke, mind you, just one of those so-called tactical nukes.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-300.

Sunday, July 24, 2016

I, Willis Hart, Am Totally Full Of Shit (I Say This As A Compliment To Myself, btw)

Regarding Donald Trump and the homos? Well, he does want to keep people out of the country who overwhelmingly think that gay folks should be put to death. Gotta give him credit for that at least.

According to the Ragheads "Homosexuality is one of the most disgusting sins and greatest crimes... It is a vile perversion that goes against sound nature, and is one of the most corrupting and hideous sins... The punishment for homosexuality is death. Both the active and passive participants are to be killed whether or not they have previously had sexual intercourse in the context of a legal marriage... Some of the companions of the Prophet stated that [the perpetrator] is to be burned with fire. It has also been said that he should be stoned, or thrown from a high place".

Above quotes from the Saudi Ministry of Education Textbooks for Islamic Studies: 2007-2008 Academic Year Center for Religious Freedom of Hudson Institute.

And, as we know, THIS is the guy who speaks for all the mussies. BTW, that Mike Pence is strongly anti-gay? Who the fuck cares? It isn't if the Republican platform this year isn't the most anti-gay platform in the party's history. Oh, wait, it is?

And Pence also voted for the Iraq war and is in favor of the TPP. Conclusion? That Donald picked this guy (who opposes much of what Donald is running on), is definitive proof that Donald Trump is bullshitting us. Which I like. I mean, if I didn't I wouldn't continually give him props when the guy is clearly totally full of shit, right?

Which, btw, is also a good thing. I say this as a blogger who is totally full of shit most of the time myself. And what's wrong with being full of shit?

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-299.

Saturday, July 23, 2016

On The Fact That Young Black Bucks Spend A Lot Of Their Time Stealing Donuts & Feeling Up White Women

Yeah, and it's outrageous! Hands off our women, I say. But the cops (knowing fully well that black suspects resist arrest at a far greater rate than the white, Asian, and Hispanic ones do) just don't need the hassle and would much prefer to let that black kid have the stolen donut or the cheap feel than end up on MSNBC, The HuffPo, etc. looking like the bad guy. I mean, I wouldn't take the risk. Would you?

Hopefully when Trump is president the cops can just shoot the vermin dead. I say this because the disparity between White and Black arrest rates in New York City actually goes down when you look at the less serious offenses; petit larceny, misdemeanor assault, misdemeanor sexual misconduct, etc.

There are of course various interpretations for this. But the one that makes the most sense to me is that OF COURSE Blacks, when they break the law, break the more serious ones. Because they are genetically prone to violence. Look it up. Yes, many of the links that are returned will probably direct you to the Stormfront website, but that doesn't mean it isn't true.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-298.

Friday, July 22, 2016

Elderly Blacks Know How Violent & Prone To Criminality Young Blacks Are (Having Been Young Violent Criminals Themselves Once)

It is a fact that there are elderly Black people in New York City, Chicago, Baltimore, Cleveland, etc. who are literally too afraid to leave their apartments to get the mail unless there's a police officer present.

And yes, escorting people to their mailboxes is a MAJOR service performed by the police. Which, like you, I did not know. But the article I read laid it out. Don't believe me? Find the article and see for yourself. I'd link to it, but I forgot the title. But I'm sure you'll be able to find it.

If not? Then just take my word for it. I am not a liar. BTW, notice that the media and political class don't seem all that interested in these folks? Easy to see why. Better old Blacks are victimized by the violent young bucks than old Whites like myself.

Fact is, I hold these elderly Black nimrods (at least) partially responsible, given the fact that a high percentage of them probably vote Democrat. If they'd wise up and vote for Gary Johnson... then things would change. In that they'd die, because Gary would eliminate their freebies. But then the remaining Blacks would get the message that they need to WORK instead of mooch.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-297.

Thursday, July 21, 2016

On The Fact That Every Time I Date A Chick She Cries "Rape" When I Attempt To Force Myself On Her

Yeah, I think holing up in a brothel for two or three days with a case of whiskey and an infinite supply of stogies and chocolate bars would be FAR preferable. Preferable to dealing with bitches that refuse to put out. This after I treat them to a moderately expensive meal! Frankly I'm getting sick of it.

That, plus all the women who know me steer clear now that it's gotten out that I went on trial for "rape". Even though the case was dropped and I was set free. Apparently I'm a pariah now. At least among the radical Marxist feminists.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-296.

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Chicks Are Dumb

Luminary Steven Pinker reports that it is a fact that, at the 760 SAT mark for math, males for outnumber females 7 to 1. Of course this is not entirely environmental, it's because men have superior brains. And, by the way, (and as Steven Pinker says), the truth cannot be sexist!

Although, at the risk of being referred to as a misogynist, I'll say that men and women have different aptitudes. Yeah, that's the ticket. Sarcasm, yes. I say this at the risk of getting myself fired. Damn it, but I think some radical Marxist feminazis I work with found this blog and MIGHT read this.

Also (quoting Pinker) "if the findings come out as showing a sex difference, one would either have to say, I guess sex discrimination wasn't so bad after all, or else furiously suppress or distort the findings so as to preserve the ideal".

And he's absolutely right, folks. On average chicks simply are not as smart as men. Oh, and that woman have, or still are, being discriminated against is largely bullshit. Not that there has been NO discrimination, but the meme that we live in a "patriarchy" is asinine bullshit.

Women need to shut the hell up about "equal pay", "rape culture", and similar crap made-up by the regressive Left. Sorry, but yes. Oh, and make me a sandwich and fetch me a beer. Ha ha ha.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-295.

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Dick Morris Is A Loser. Yet, Not As Much Of A Loser As WD. Trust Me On This. I Hired A PI To Investigate Him

Did you know that Dick Morris is now employed at Newsmax, a low budget new station that I Can access for free on my Roku? Yeah, I guess that that's what happens (a major demotion) when you make one idiotic prognostication after another. Oh well, at least the fellow's still working.

As opposed to that fucker wd, a slant-headed miscreant blogger who obviously isn't. I mean, how else would he have time to write so many posts. For this year alone the total is up to 636! Yikes! The dude is clearly not working! If he was he wouldn't have the time to write 636 fucking posts.

Oh, no wait... that's MY blogging total. For my Contra O'Reilly blog (not counting the posts I've written for this blog).

Don't jump to any conclusions, however. In my case the fact that I blog 3 times a day (almost every day) means nothing. Blogging a lot only equals unemployment in wd's case, NOT mine. I'm a winner with a job that I make a LOT of money doing. And for which I get a LOT of respect. You can trust me on that.

As for wd, the REAL reason I know he is jobless is because I hired a private investigator to look into it. I only suspected that wd was a parent-basement-dwelling loser, but after I got the PI report I knew it for a fact.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of knowing everything there is to know about wd. LLIN-294.

Saturday, July 16, 2016

The Police Aren't Killing Enough Blacks

The police killings of Black suspects are usually justified. A Black man has a gun that he intends to use to shoot an officer of the law. He has committed a crime and MUST be taken into custody before he hurts anyone. Under these circumstances the police have no choice but to shoot the suspect dead.

These shootings are totally justified. Too bad for the families of the dead Black criminal. But when you break the law you risk you life. Especially if you do it with a gun. But get this - according to the University of Toledo's Robert Johnson - from 2009 to 2012, an average of 4,472 Black men were murdered by other Black men. Annually! This is a stat that is ludicrously out of proportion when compared to Whites.

This, while the number of Black men killed by cops was 112 per year (with a significant number of them being justified. My conclusion? The police aren't killing ENOUGH Black criminals. I mean, yes, the Blacks are doing their part by killing each other. But it's clearly not enough! Seriously the obvious solution to this problem is for the cops to exterminate more Blacks. As many as possible. Whether the killing is justified or unjustified. Either method is fine by me.

Because Black lives matter, each and every one... as much as a bucket of warm piss. The fewer of these animals there are, the lower the crime rate. And the less law abiding Whites like me will be victimized by these animals. It's that simple. Plus we save money on trying and incarcerating.

This is why I ALWAYS come down on the side of the police officer when some wild Black animal is put down. Maybe the officer really had no choice, or maybe he just didn't want to take a chance. Why the hell should police officers risk their lives? Better to shoot (and shoot to kill) than take a risk, I say.

Which is why I say that if the officer sees a gun, or suspects there might be a gun, they should shoot the Black DEAD. Even if a cop shoots a Black dead, then lies about thinking they had a gun. So the fuck what? The thing to remember is that the more Blacks put down the better. Sorry, but yes.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of racism. LLIN-293.

Friday, July 15, 2016

Gun Rights Are For Whites

While I don't own a gun myself, I am a BIG supporter of gun rights. With one caveat. Gun rights should be for Whites (and possibly Asians) only. Black people should not own guns. I reached this conclusion, btw, after listening to that asshole Obama's speech at the funeral for those 5 murdered Dallas police officers.

A speech during which he simultaneously stated that a) police violence against young Blacks isn't isolated but systemic and b) the vast majority of cops are good, honest, and hard-working. Yeah, he's trying to thread the needle here (unsuccessfully, I would say))))).

What kind of an person would give yet another boneheaded and divisive speech on race (drawing a moral equivalence between the cold-blooded murder of those five cops in Dallas with the death of those two black guys whose small brains at least partially contributed with their demise) AND DO IT AT A FUCKING FUNERAL? I mean, I don't know about you but that totally creeped me out.

Proof Blacks should NOT own guns!! Either they use them to commit crimes, or carry them and get themselves shot when pulled over or otherwise confronted by the police (and they have a gun either on their person or in their car). Why? Because the cops SHOULD always assume that a Black with a gun intends to use it to kill them (Blacks being inherently criminal and violent).

This is why Blacks should absolutely NOT own guns! Not that we could pass a law prohibiting this (Constitutional reasons). But Blacks with guns - even if they have them legally and for self protection only - should expect to be shot if the cops catch them with one. Sorry, but yes.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-292.

Thursday, July 14, 2016

The Police Should Be Able To Kill As Many Blacks As They Want

In fact, being that the black murder rate is fully 6 times that of whites (17.5 per 100,000 versus 2.6 per 100,000) with the perpetrators being 93% other black people, I'm actually quite insulted that Black Lives Matter makes an issue of cops killing Black people.

Why this bullshit is being placed not just at my doorstep but the law enforcement community's, I can't comprehend. STOP BLOWING YOUR FUCKING BRAINS OUT. Much of it over foolishness; half-eaten Snickers bars, Air Jordan sneaks, some big-butted heifer, a slight, etc!

Until then BLM should shut the hell up. Blacks are killing each other, so why the hell shouldn't cops be able to kill them? Justified or unjustified, who gives a fuck? In either case I say... blast away. Because Black lives do NOT matter. This according to the Black community for Christ!

BTW, don't believe me that darkies are killing each other over half-eaten Snickers bars, Air Jordan sneaks, some big-butted heifer or slight? Tough. I'm going to keep saying it and NEVER provide any evidence that any darkie has been killed by another darkie for such a reason. I must have read it somewhere. You don't know how to use Google?

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-291.

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

On The Odds of a White Person Being Able To Have An "Honest Conversation" About Race with Obama, Holder, Or Any Leftist Minstrel

Yeah, probably about the same as Bridget Bishop, Rebecca Nurse, and Giles Corey had when those folks tried to have an honest conversation about witchcraft with the douche-bag magistrates in Salem circa 1692. Zero, in other words.

Blacks won't honestly discuss race because they're all racists. Except for the Conservative Blacks. Obviously they aren't racist.

Clearly they must have bigger brains than your average darkie. Probably a result of one of their ancestors being raped by a White guy. Or somehow otherwise being cross-bred. Because, as we all know, Blacks are genetically less intelligent than Whites. But also much more prone to violence and criminality.

And THAT is why Obama, Holder, etc will NEVER honestly discuss race. They won't admit that most Africoons are violent and dumb. Even though Obama was born to a White woman, and therefore is more intelligent. Meaning he KNOWS what he's doing is dishonest.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-290.

Monday, July 11, 2016

Violent Black Cops Shooting Violent Black Criminals!

Did you know that it's a fact that (according to University of Pennsylvania Sociologist, Greg Ridgeway) a Black police officer is 3.3 times more likely to fire his weapon at a crime scene than a White, Asian, or Hispanic officer?

No, of course you did not! Because the Liberal media won't report this. The PDF is available on the internet, BTW, so go find it yourself if you don't believe me.

And, gee, I wonder who a virtual shitload of those victims might be. Any ideas, folks? Yeah, that's right... it's other violent Blacks! Time to purge the PO of all Black officers? If you want to appease the Black Lives Matter racists, this might be something to consider.

Because it isn't the White cops who are shooting all the Black suspects, only a small portion of them. These latest shootings being anecdotes. Anecdotes that the Liberal media and racist BLM folks point to, in a futile effort to make it LOOK like White racist cops are the problem. Which they aren't. As usual it's the inherently criminal and violent Blacks!

The Left's response is that something called "institutional racism" is to blame... to which I say "yeah, right"! Sarcastically, btw. Because like with "white privilege", "male privilege" and "patriarchy", "institutional racism" is just another made-up term for something that does not exist.

Made up by self-hating Whites and their minstrel allies (minstrels = Black liberals who have a media platform). Made up so they can shift blame for criminality to White conservatives. When WE ALL KNOW Blacks are inherently violent and criminal. Most likely due to their smaller brains.

Which is a scientific fact!! I point this out in case any Lefty trolls attempt to call me racist for stating scientific facts. Sorry, but no.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of racism. LLIN-289.

Sunday, July 10, 2016

On The Fact That Former Fox News Anchor, Gretchen Carlson, Is Now Accusing Her Former Boss, Roger Ailes, of Sexually Harassing Her On The Job

Yeah, I strongly suspect that this story won't be leading off the Kelly File, Hannity or duh Factor any time soon. The other networks - that's a different story!!

Me, I think the biotch should have just slept with him. I mean, the primary reason Fox hires the skirts is as eye candy, and for that reason Carlson should have been grateful for her job. And to her boss, who approved her high salary. Was he that out of line to expect a little sugar in return? I say no.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of misogyny. LLIN-288.

Friday, July 8, 2016

On The Fact That Somebody Got To FBI Director James Comey

That someone got to him is the only thing that explains why he let Corrupt Hillary off the hook. What I'm wondering now was if it was a bribe or a threat? Maybe HRC promised he could keep his job in her administration? Or perhaps she (or Obama) threatened to kill his family if he didn't reach the right conclusion?

I don't know. Perhaps further investigations by the Republican Congress will uncover the truth? I won't hold my breath... but if somehow how they did? Surely that would throw the election to Donald Trump.

I mean, everything that Comey said in his presentation pointed straight to a recommendation to indict (the fact that dozens of these messages were considered classified AT THE TIME, the fact that her server wasn't even as secure as Gmail, his admission that other people would have been penalized for these transgressions, etc). And then, kaboom, nothing!!!

It's outrageous! If there were a march to protest the fact that HRC hasn't been indicted... I'd support it. That bitch belongs behind bars. No matter that there was a much worse email scandal under the Bush administration (one that involved the destruction of 22 million emails in order to cover up election thievery directed by AG Gonzales).

But Bush hasn't been president for 8 years!! Everyone knows that if you commit political crimes and get away with them... you're in the clear and nobody should never talk about them again. And everyone also knows this only applies to Republicans. Sorry, but yes.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-287.

Thursday, July 7, 2016

On the Claim that Killing One Bad Man In Yemen (Often Along with 25 Innocent Ones) Via Remote Control Constitutes Self-Defense

Sounds more like cold-blooded murder to me but, hey, what do I care? We're only talking about some backward savages, after all. Some might say the less of these people in the world the better.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-286.

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

On The Fact That All Climate Scientists Who Say AGW Is Real Are Corrupt & On The Take

No, I don't have any proof that I'm going to present. But, think about it... scientists don't like to travel coach any more than the rest of us do and so OF COURSE these two-bit whores are going to tell the government what it wants to hear - namely, that the world is going to end and that homo sapiens are the cause.

Yeah, there surely is a lot more money on the other side... Big Oil shelling out loads of cash to cover up the truth. But scientists on that side of the debate are incorruptible. At least they wouldn't sell out for first class plane tickets, no way.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of climate change denialism. LLIN-285.

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

If You're White Know That Black People Want You Dead

In regards to the paradigm of "Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, and Europe/North America for everybody"... It does seem a little anti-white (not to mention, hypocrisy-ladened), does it not?

Not that I want to go to Africa, mind you. I mean, given the fact that a black person is 25 times more likely to violently attack a White person than the other way around they're probably chomping at the bit for White people to murder over there. Not that they aren't murdering each other all the time. But a White guy? They'd probably end up fighting each other regarding who gets to murder me. If I was foolish enough to visit there, that is.

Which I am not, btw. What I'm saying is that violent Black animals aren't welcome in White neighborhoods for good reason. If you're a darkie prowling for a White victim, I say STAY THE HELL OUT! Because If I see you... I'll call the cops and they'll beat your ass. At a minimum. Perhaps they'll see that you're reaching for your gun and shoot you dead!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-284.

Sunday, July 3, 2016

On Slant-Headed British Millennials Who Are Trying to Equate Britain's Leaving the European Union with Fascism

So, giving more and more power to some distant and corrupt central authority ISN'T fascism but self determination is? Man oh man is this current generation ever dumb.

Oh, and what the hell is wrong with wanting to keep Muslims out of your country? Sure, if you can import harmless hardworking brown people to do manual labor jobs for low pay... that's great. But importing brown people who will leach off the natives (via the welfare state) or (worse yet) commit terroristic acts? Sorry, but no.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-283.

Saturday, July 2, 2016

Koran = Evil

When the U.S Confederation government (circa 1786) sent Thomas Jefferson and John Adams to Tripoli to negotiate an end to the Barbary Pirates' illegal raiding of U.S. vessels, Tripoli ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahamas told the two U.S. Diplomats that "It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and the duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise".

Yep, and it's good to see that they've made such progress in the last 230 years. Douche-bag ragheads. To bad that when Thomas Jefferson became President (and refused to pay tribute, instead sending a United States Naval fleet to the Mediterranean where they bombarded the various fortified pirate cities, ultimately extracting concessions of fair passage from their rulers), he didn't instead wipe them out.

Or continue bombardment until maximum casualties were inflicted, at least. Today I'm thinking we should just nuke em. Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, etc. Ann Coulter said we should nuke them, and perhaps there's something to that idea. I mean, as a Libertarian I'm opposed to war, but you simply can NOT reason with these savages. So we might not have any choice but to annihilate them.

And, if we simply dropped a bunch of nukes it would be over and done with fairly quickly (no protracted war, costing the US blood and treasure). Sure, that would be genocide (and some peaceful ragheads might be killed), but who really gives a shit about the lives of backward barbarians? Not me, that's for sure.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of Islamophobia. LLIN-282.

Friday, July 1, 2016

Seriously, I'd Like To Beat The Crap Out Of Chris Hayes, Re His Stoogish & Pitiful Attempt To Defend The Repugnant Mrs. Clinton (What A Piece Of Shit She Is!)

I actually watched Chris Hayes for several minutes interview some equally partisan and obnoxious buffoon from Media Matters the other night but promptly had to turn the channel when these two pseudo-intellectual douchebags started spinning faster than Ann Miller and Janet Leigh in "Two Tickets to Broadway" in what was obviously a pitiful attempt to defend the repugnant Mrs. Clinton in regards to... ???

I don't actually recall what they were defending her on. Probably regarding her criminal actions relating to having a private email server (sending classified information). Or it might have been in regards to her criminal actions regarding Benghazi (lying to families about the attack being linked to some idiotic video).

All I know is that I changed the channel very quickly. Which is something I do quite a bit... tune into MSNBC and then change the channel promptly. Usually no more than 20 to 30 times a day. The rest of the time I spend watching the hotties on Fox News. Yeah, I'd be able to stomach MSNBC for longer periods of time if they put some hot women on it. Hot lesbians would be awesome... but NOT Rachel Maddow for sure!

Anyway, do these people (and, yes, I would put Hannity in this class, too) simply not realize how idiotic and transparent that they look? I mean, I understand that they're aiming at a specific audience and all but I would tell 'em straight up that if their goal is to persuade the undecided, this 1970s pro wrestling good versus evil silliness ain't gonna do it. It's not.

Hot lesbians smooching... that would do it.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-281.

Thursday, June 30, 2016

Regarding The Epidemic Of Violence Loving Black Kids Attacking White Kids In Our Schools

Regarding parents who send their White, Asian, or Biracial kids to predominantly Black schools? I say it is a form of child-abuse in that as the numbers I'm pulling out of my ass bear out, a black kid is 25 times more likely to violently attack a white kid than the other way around.

No, I don't have the numbers for the school-aged population, which is why I said I pulled those numbers out of my ass. It is a fact, however, that a black person is 25 times more likely to violently attack a White person than the other way around and I can't believe that it is appreciably different re these thugs-in-training.

For the record, I do understand that this view is quite racist and therefore a great many folks will be butt-hurt by it. But we must never fear the truth and always, ALWAYS, put our White children first. And non-White/non-Black kids second. Because protecting our future from the little violent Black animals should be paramount.

BTW, you might be asking why the Blacks are so violent. Me, I think it's genetic. Same reason why the negroes have smaller brains (I strongly suggest that you check out the article "DNA Proof of Racial Differences – More Facts Come to Light" for the disturbing truth).

Also BTW, Biracial kids, if they are half negro may or may not be violent. It's a roll of the dice, genetics-wise. So, if you're White why take the chance and mate with a darkie? You might end up with a violent kid that ends up attacking you. Best stick with one of your own when procreating, I say.

Image: Chart showing why Blacks are so violent and stupid... higher hormone levels and significantly smaller brains (much lower average IQs). Why are we wasting money sending these idiots to school? A better idea would be to get rid of the minimum wage and then put these thugs to work. I'm talking about hard manual labor jobs with White overseers to keep them in line (perhaps with whips).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of racism. LLIN-280.

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Lester Of Oz

This dude (Rational Nation), either doesn't believe me and thinks that I actually do read the nonsense he emails me OR he feels that I'll eventually break down out of curiosity. Either way he's wrong.

Having spent many years dealing with alzheimer's patients and working with and COMPROMISING with people I can say with the assurance drawn from experience that RN is most assuredly one of a kind. Best approach? Humor and ignore.

Lester of Oz has become quite... let's just leave it at delusional and perhaps suffering from drug induced hallucinations. That and he appears to have lapsed into mocking those he hates via his "Jersey McJones" sockpuppet.

Also the dude has been talking with himself at RNUSA for awhile now ("Jersey" comments and Lester responds). Lester of Oz had taken his place at the table with the strangest and most misdirected souls of our era I think!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-279.

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Rational Nation: What An Asshole!

I refer to the blogger who uses the moniker "Rational Nation", but whose real name is Lester Carpenter. Or, that's what he SAYS his name is, at least. Lately I've been thinking that his name might actually be Jersey McJones.

Jersey McJones is a hardcore Progressive lunatic. Oh, and he's also a sockpuppet controlled by Rational Nation! So, while previously I thought Jersey was created by RN for debating purposes (RN as Jersey would thrown out a ridiculous Leftist argument, then RN as himself would refute it), NOW I'm convinced that the true persona was represented by Jersey all along!

By which I mean that (while I thought) that RN used to be a fiscally conservative and socially tolerant anarcho-capitalist Libertarian (someone I was proud to consider a colleague) he was actually a hardcore progressive lunatic... FROM THE BEGINNING. By which I mean he was always an insufferable buffoon. He just hid it really well.

Which is quite amazing, given the fact that he wasn't able to hide the fact that Jersey McJones was a sock puppet. HIS sock puppet. This, a fact that even the low-functioning Tao was able to discern (which speaks volumes).

In any case, that is why I have reached the conclusion that Rational Nation is (and always has been) a total asshole. Seriously, fuck that guy.

Oh, and stop emailing me! One of the most infuriating things about this situation is the fact that he continues to send me unsolicited messages which make it very clear that he's a total wack-job! (hardcore Progressive screeds). Piss off, RN! I mean, how dense are you that you can't figure out I want nothing to do with you any longer?

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-278.

Monday, June 27, 2016

Thoughts On The Hardcore Progressive Blog "Rational Nation USA"

Apparently the proprietor, Rational Nation AKA Lying Lester, still insists that he's a Libertarian Gary Johnson voter. This despite the fact that he checks off all of the brain-diseased leftist boxes! I mean, he has clearly transformed from an anarcho-capitalist classical-liberal worshiper of Ayn Rand who despised Liberal Leftists into a hardcore Progressive.

I mean, just look at the dim bulbs who comment there - Octopus, Shaw, wd, Flying Junior, Jerry Critter, BB-Idaho, etc. The dumbest of the dumb when it comes to stupid brain-diseased Progressives. And then there is Jersey McJones! I refer to the sockpuppet controlled by Rational Nation himself! And, using that persona, RN writes as the true Leftist lunatic that he is!

Secondly, take a look at the issues he sides with the Left on. RN is with the looney Left when it comes to the totally discredited concept that says humans are the primary drivers of global warming. When the truth is that the small temperature increase over the last century is most likely a natural phenomenon. Most of it (the warming) being attributable to volcanoes and solar flares.

And RN is also with the gun-grabbing Left when it comes to their desire to grab the guns of law abiding citizens. Without due process and in violation of the 2nd amendment. RN likely voted for Hillary Clinton due to his strong agreement with her stated goal of repealing the 2nd amendment.

All of which causes me to believe that Jersey McJones was the true Les Carpenter all along and that the anarcho-capitalist chap was the alter-ego.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-277.

Sunday, June 26, 2016

Lying Lester (AKA Rational Nation) Is A Liar & A Total Wack-Job!

Yes, given the moniker he used when he used to write for this blog, I should have known that he is a liar. I just thought he was lying about something else. Turns out he was lying about who he is. Which is a hardcore Progressive and NOT an anarcho-capitalist classical-liberal worshiper of Ayn Rand who despised Progressives.

Which, from everything he wrote (getting into endless wars with Leftists on various blog-sites) he convinced me he was. But, as it turns out, he expresses his TRUE political leanings when he writes as Jersey McJones (his lunatic Leftist sockpuppet).

Which is why, after he has exposed his true self (checks off all of the brain-diseased leftist boxes), I banned his ass from my blog. Because I have no patience for people who lie about who they are. Also, I'm not willing to converse with Leftists. I used to allow these lunatics (think wd) to comment on my blog, but no more. I simply no longer have the patience for the virulent idiocy that is progressivism.

The most infuriating thing is that he continues to send me unsolicited messages while acting like a total wack-job. The guy is totally insane! Yeah, I'm thinking I should file a complaint with the server on grounds of harassment (because that worked out so well the last time).

Meanwhile I think I'm going to use that system I developed in order to not see wd submissions, which is to use a 4.5 x 5.5 cutout to cover the comments section but which allows me to see the author. Then, when I see the a Blogger ID I don't like (wd or Rational Nation) I can promptly delete their virulent idiocy.

Or, that is what I'll do if he tries to comment here. Which so far he hasn't. On my other blog, Contra O'Reilly, I restricted comments to "team members" only. What I'm talking about is email messages. For some reason RN keeps sending them to me. Frankly I'm a little concerned (as well as TOTALLY creeped out).

What a nut job! Perhaps he's suffering from multiple personality disorder? Or maybe it was an elaborate prank? Or (and I think this is the actual answer) he is a compulsive liar. I mean, he DID decide to call himself "Lying Lester". And (on this blog) admitted to being a confabulator. Although (like I previously noted) he said he was disembling about other things and NOT about who he was. Which was an anarcho-capitalist Ayn Rand-worshipping Libertarian. As opposed to a hardcore Progressive

Asshole. At least I got the last laugh by stealing this blog from him. Seriously that really pissed him off!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-276.

Saturday, June 25, 2016

On The Fact That Rational Nation Is Now Lying About Having Been An Anarcho-Capitalist

Lying Lester (AKA Rational Nation), the former proprietor of this blog says "I am not now, nor have I ever been an Anarcho-Capitalist Libertarian". But he's lying. Lester absolutely was an anarcho-capitalist!

But the TRUTH is that this is a fellow who went from being an anarcho-capitalist classical-liberal worshiper of Ayn Rand who despised progressives and who got into endless wars with them on various blog-sites to a person who now essentially checks off all of the brain-diseased leftist boxes.

It is one of the most bizarre political 180s (Anarcho-Capitalist Libertarian to Hardcore Progressive) that I have ever witnessed and it really makes me wonder if perhaps that lunatic Leftist sock-puppet of his (Jersey McJones; somebody that he created for debating purposes, I guess) was the true RN all along and that the anarcho-capitalist chap was the alter-ego.

Of course, the most infuriating thing for me is this insistence of his that I'VE CHANGED (which, yes, I have but only from a small l libertarian to a somewhat larger L libertarian - closer to what he used to be, in other words) and the fact that he continues to send me unsolicited messages while acting like a total wack-job. I mean, I understand that the blogosphere is primarily comprised of said rabble (hard-core conservatives and liberals, angry bozos, true-believers, partisan schmucks, etc.) but this episode stands out majorly from my viewpoint.

In many of these unsolicited messages Lester begs for me to allow him to write new commentaries for this blog. Apparently he thinks I owe him this because he's the one who started this blog? Think again Lester. Or should I say Jersey?

Contra O'Reilly Jersey McJones Sockpuppet Posts
[5/6/2015] On the Blogger Jersey McJones.
[8/11/2015] On the Obvious Sock-Puppet, Jersey McJones, Attempting to Tie Economic Growth to Inflation.
[11/25/2016] On the Fact that Even the Normally Low-Functioning Tao Was Able to Ascertain the True Identity of a Sock-Puppet Named "Jersey McJones".
[4/19/2016] On Going from an Anarcho-Captitalist Libertarian Who Worshiped Ayn Rand and Who Thoroughly Despised the Progressive Left to Somebody Who Essentially Signs-Off on Every Cockamamie Leftist Notion...
[6/23/2016] On the Curious Case of Rational Nation (and His Alter-Ego, Jersey McJones).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-275.

Friday, June 24, 2016

On Those Who Won't Debate The Luminarias Islamophobe Sam Harris

If you're a non-Islamophobic media figure you should agree to debate the Islamophobe Sam Harris or STFU. Sam Harris, like me, knows that Muslim ragheads are awful. In that they're totally backward. By which I mean they hold views 100 percent incompatible with our values (rational Western Whites such as myself).

One such person (someone who refuses to debate the luminarias Harris) is Abby Martin, some bimbo journalist with a BA and a job on some marginal cable channel in which she spews forth nothing but paranoiac and condescending SJW bullshit. BTW, by "paranoiac" I mean that she truthfully acknowledges how our economic system is rigged to benefit the wealthy.

Although that's something wealth-worshipping stooges like myself like to keep on the downlow. So we deny, deny, deny. Because, if a problem is widely recognized to be a problem, then people might start demanding that their elected representatives do something about it. Which I (and my fellow wealth-worshipping buddies) absolutely do not want. Which is why my standard line of BS is that the system is NOT rigged.

In any case, Abby Martin might have a BA, but that in no way indicates that she's intelligent. I know for a fact that she has an IQ somewhere in the mid-90s. Although, to be completely honest, this is a "fact" I pulled straight out of my ass.

Still, I think it's likely that Martin is a moron. Because she won't debate Sam Harris. And, as everyone knows, the ONLY to determine who's right and who's wrong (when two people have opposing viewpoints) is for them to debate.

The lack of self-awareness here is staggering. I mean, does this slant-headed bitch actually think that she would stand a chance in a debate with Harris? ON ANYTHING? My lord, Harris is a genious! (a "fact" I know in the same way I know Martin is a mental midget).

And she's a woman, so that's another factor working against her. What with women generally not being as intelligent as men. And Leftist women (in particular) always (as far as I know) being deficient, brain-wise. They wouldn't be Leftists if they were smart. Duh!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of Islamophobia and Misogyony. LLIN-274.

Thursday, June 23, 2016

On The Fact That The Government Forced Minority Students To Attend UC Berkeley, UCLA, & UC San Diego

Did you know that enrollment figures for minority students at UC Berkeley, UCLA, and UC San Diego went down after Prop 209 (the measure which did away with racial preferences but NOT Affirmative Action) passed in California, while the enrollment numbers for the Irvine, Santa Cruz, and Riverside Campuses SKYROCKETED!!!

Gee, how shocking, people making better decisions for themselves (the fact that they ended up at colleges which were far more appropriate for their level of preparation) than the government did. Who'da thunk it?

Question is, why was the government forcing minority students to attend the more prestigious UC Berkeley, UCLA, and UC San Diego when they clearly belonged at the lesser Irvine, Santa Cruz, and Riverside? Fucking minority dumbshits.

Anyway, according to published data, graduation rates have been steadily improving over the last 20 years throughout the UC system, with little impact of Prop 209 on that trend. Which SOME might say points to a flaw in my logic - that minorities are being mismatched to schools they'd don't have the brains to attend. And thus they're dropping out (The effect of Prop 209 on UC admissions and campus diversity).

If that were the case, then shouldn't minority attendance declining result in a higher graduation rate (given that they're the ones who were dropping out)? But that isn't what happened. Proof "mismatch" is racist bullshit? Perhaps.

Actually, yes. But it's racist bullshit disguised as good research. Which it isn't. But I'll be damned if that stops me from insisting that it is. Or from dishonestly bashing Progressives for "hurting" minorities by advocating for such programs (because they've been proven to be effective).

The truth is that I don't give a shit because I'm a racist. Not that being a racist is a bad thing. That's just what the Left calls you when you acknowledge the FACT that the White man's brain is superior compared to the brains of people of other races. That's just science. Sorry, but yes.

BTW, when I said Prop 209 did away with racial preferences but NOT Affirmative Action, I totally lied. In that the two terms are virtually synonymous. If you're doing away with "racial preferences" you're doing away with Affirmative Action. I mean, that is exactly why the initiative was opposed by affirmative action advocates, for crying out loud!

As for anyone who didn't realize I was talking out of my ass? They're total dumbshits. But, hey, if I just say Prop 209 didn't do away with Affirmative Action? Perhaps some dumbshits will be fooled. Including dumbshits such as myself.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-273.

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

On The Fact That Bernie Sanders Hasn't Conceded Yet Despite The Fact That The Schmuck Is Mathematically Eliminated

So not only does this guy know nothing about economics, he apparently can't compute, either. What an embarrassment. I mean, I knew Bernie Sanders was dumb, but how many of his followers know he's a fucking retard?

Sure, some say he's staying in until the convention so he can maximize his leverage. And yeah, that is a lot more believable than my narrative, which is that he actually thinks he can still win... but that won't stop me from spinning it.

Fact is I figured out awhile back that the dimwit should be living in some group home for mentally challenged persons. As opposed to being a senator running for Congress.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-272.

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

On The Elegant & Original Photography Featuring Ballet Bitches & Circus Hos By Vermont's Jeffrey M. Lewis

While his subject matter is extremely varied and excellent across the board, I ask you to draw special attention to these ballet bitches and circus hos in that they are utterly amazing. I mean, they'd be even more amazing as nudes, but they're still pretty amazing! Please, check out his web-site. The prices are reasonable and the editions limited (the archive with all of his images).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of Objectifying Women. LLIN-271.

Sunday, June 19, 2016

Proof The Leftist Media Is Out To Get Trump

Did you know that Bill Clinton has received over $16 million in compensation for being the honorary chancellor of a diploma mill that has repeatedly been sued for fraud (something called laureate Education) - this while at the same time said enterprise's parent company has received $55 million dollars in grants from a Hillary Clinton led State Department? (source).

Likely not. Apparently our Leftist media doesn't consider it newsworthy. But isn't this just as bad (and maybe worse) as Trump University? Please? I know I'm praying that it is. Because if both DJT and HRC are charged and found guilty... can you say President Gary Johnson? Unlikely, sure. But when you reside on the farthest fringes ideologically (like I do), far fetched scenarios SOMEHOW placing your fringe candidate in office are all one has to cling to.

Don't get me, wrong - I hate HRC considerably more than DJT (he who has "offended" the Liberal media via a cadre of impolitic statements). Which is why I'd only vote for HRC if someone held a gun to my head. Sure, I wouldn't vote for DJT either, but that the Liberal media keeps attacking him (while ignoring Clinton transgressions) makes me so mad!

I mean, so the fuck what if Donald flat out ripped off people via his so-called "university"? I call it pigeon plucking, and have no problem at all if stupid people voluntarily decide to hand over their money. I mean, it's their fault if they don't do their homework. And, as a Libertarian, I am 100 percent in favor of education provided by the private sector on a for-profit basis (and do not believe these for-$ educators need any stinking regulation).

As for this applying to Laureate Education as well as Trump U... the answer is yes. But I'm going the hypocrite route on here and saying the Clintons should be hammered on this, while Donald should be given a pass. Even though, according to Jonathan Turley "there is no evidence of a quid pro quo arrangement or even direct grants" re Laureate's parent company receiving $55 million in grants from the HRC led State Department.

So, while the Clinton education "scandal" may be more unsavory as opposed to criminal, while Trump's fake "university" absolutely looks like a case of outright fraud, I'm still thinking the Clintons should be prosecuted and the Trump case dropped.

Does that Mexican judge have it in for Trump? I doubt it's because he's Mexican. But he clearly is prejudiced against savvy businessmen like Trump who are good at raking in the profits. And there's also the fact that Gonzalo Curiel was installed as a judge on the United States District Court for the Southern District of California after being nominated by... President Barack Obama!

This would be the same Obama who was the subject of allegations of not being US-born by Donald Trump. Which indicates that Trump being persecuted here might be a case of payback. I mean, since I'm already spinning unsubstantiated (Clinton-only) conspiracies, what's one more?

By the way, I noted near the beginning of my commentary that Laureate has been "repeatedly" been sued for fraud. Turley says this happened once, and the case was dismissed. Repeatedly or once, I say Laureate (and by association, the Clintons) are guilty as hell and should go to prison. Or at least not end up in the White House. Sorry, but no.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-270.

Saturday, June 18, 2016

On Donald Trump Saying We Need To Renegotiate Our Trade Deals

Is Donald Trump's economic illiteracy so profound that he's unaware of the fact that immigration doesn't just move the supply curve (pertaining to labor) but the demand curve, too? This is why wages are only pushed down substantially, but NOT pushed down (for the most part) dramatically.

I guess that they didn't offer Libertarian Econ 101 at the Wharton School during his tenure there (that or he took a regular Econ class). Yet another reason I'll be voting for Gary Johnson again. Because Gary understands that opening the borders will bring prosperity for all (all the people in the 0.1 percent, that is).

Gary Johnson: My vision of the border with Mexico is that a truck from the United States going into Mexico and a truck coming from Mexico into the United States will pass each other at the border going 60 miles an hour. Yes, we should have open borders. (Gary Johnson on Immigration).

This, to me, sounds like a VERY good idea. Because 42% of Mexico's total population lives below the national poverty line, while in the United States, only 13.2% of Americans are living in poverty.

Gary Johnson KNOWS the US can do better! By "better" I mean we can do a better job of transferring wealth from the lower classes up to the higher/better classes. Opening up the border would help the US move toward greater wealth disparity.

Although "recent census data shows that half the population qualifies as poor or low income" in the United States, so we're not doing that bad. But Donald Trump says we need to "renegotiate" our trade deals. Apparently so that some of those manufacturing jobs that were sent to China can come back here?

Yeah, that's something I say "no way" to. Because driving down American's incomes by outsourcing labor to low wage countries is a BIG part of the oligarch's plan to destroy the middle class. And, this is a strategy that's been in place for quite awhile, with both Republican and Democratic presidents and administrations working to further it.

Opening the border, on the other hand, is generally opposed by both parties. The Republicans being more fervert on this issue, however. Which is why Donald Trump proposed building a wall.

I mean, if we'd be fortunate enough to get Gary Johnson into the White House in 2017, perhaps we could move toward opening the borders (the "we" being those of us, like myself, who worship the oligarchs). But since that's probably not likely, continuing "free trade" seems the best course of action (to continue transitioning the US to neo feudalism).

But with Donald Trump as the Republican nominee? All I can say is WOW. This is surely NOT a good development. Hopefully HRC (is she is our next president) will flip-flop on the TPP (again).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-269.