Lying Lester Says iSlam Is The rEligion of Pure Evil

That ISIS is threatening more beheadings of captured Americans if President Obama does not stop American operations in Iraq should take no one by surprise, ISIS being the scum of the earth.

Radical jihadists, adherents all to the "prophet" Muhammad and his "religion" called iSlam, will continue their barbarous assault on reason, liberty, Christianity, Judaism, Objectivism and any other belief system that does not conform to their treacherous beliefs and values (Objectivism being the last one I named, but the best one).

It remains to be seen what Obama will determine to do in response to this beheading of an innocent American journalist. Now may not be the time to show weakness, although I'm sure he will, given the fact that he is a lazy Black man.

As for we should do, Lying Lester thinks the mUslins should be given the opportunity to denounce/renounce their "prophet" and convert to some other rEligion (Lying Lester favors Objectivism). If not? Then Lying Lester says KILL THEM ALL!!! Perhaps some beheadings of our own might be one option we could (at least) consider?

In any case, the evil that is iSlam can no longer be tolerated. And saying so, by the way, is not bigoted, as one troll who is now banned from rAtional nAtion uSA suggested. Just ask my mUslin friends. I told them that mOhamed was an evil man, and they completely agreed with me.

Although they did say that, "Islam requires that mOhamed be acknowledged as Aslan's final prophet". To that I said "no". And then my mUslin friends said "you make a compelling argument, Lester. We'll do it". And then they broke from the mUslin church and formed a brand new sect of iSlam. A new sect that acknowledges that mOhamed was an evil man and a false prophet.

As for still using the Quran, which is the central religious text of iSlam and is believed by mUslins to have been revealed to mOhamed by Aslan, I said "that won't work, given that mOhamed wasn't a prophet and therefore he couldn't have had the text revealed to him by Aslan".

But I came up with a workable solution. I told my mUslin friends that they could pretend the text of the Quran was revealed (dictated by Aslan) to someone else. I mean - as with all rEligions - iSlam is completely pretend anyway... so just pretend someone else transcribed what the imaginary Aslan told him, her, or them?

I suggested Jesus, and my mUslin friends agreed, given that iSlam already views Jesus as a prophet. "Really?" I said. That iSlam views Jesus as a prophet is not something I knew. I would have thought that Jesus, being a good guy who did not rape and pillage, would be viewed by iSlam as an infidel.

But my mUslin friends said, "no, he's a prophet too. Or, he is a prophet while mOhamed is not. Not in our eyes anymore, anyway". And I told them that I was glad to hear that, as it meant they were serious about iSlam being a rEligion of peace. And, any mUslin that does not desire death should agree as well.

Agree by converting to this new form of iSlam that rejects the prophethood of mOhamed. They can convert to this new mOhamed-condemning sect of iSlam, or we (the sane rational world) will unleash such destruction on them they'll wish they were never born!

And I also suggested changing the name of their rEligion, so us sane folks would know who among the flea-and-lice-infested sand monkeys are the non-evil ones.

Christianity is named after the Christian's gOd, Christ... so what about Aslanity, named, of course, after the mUslim's lion-deity, Aslan?

Byline: This rational and non-iSlamophobic commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-122.

Lying Lester Ponders: Is oBama The Laziest Black pResident Ever?

Lying Lester says oBama should be ashamed for living up to the stereotype! And, while some lIberal pRogressives might call Lying Lester "racist" for pointing this out, the fact is oBama IS lazy and Lying Lester is not "racist" for acknowledging the truth.

Looking at the first picture, it seems that oBama also enjoys fried chicken and drinking his 40. Where is the watermelon, I wonder? He's probably having that for desert... and washing it down with some grape Koolaide.

Byline: This truthfull and non-racist commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-121.

Lying Lester Asks: Is It Time For The Ascendancy Of The Libertarian Party?

With America's two major parties unable to get much done these days, and with both stuck in old paradigms or just plan nonsense, it is time, IMNHO (in my never humble opinion) to consider alternative minor parties. Libertarian is not a bad choice, although not one that would be endorsed by Ayn Rand, and for hose who have read her thoroughly know this.

Nonetheless, the Libertarian party offers an attractive alternative for hose concerned with an overreaching overarching federal government. Reaching into the pockets of rich people and stealing their wealth. The wealth they stole from workers by forcing them to work for low, low wages. Which, as the great Ayn Rand knew, is the reverse of the natural order of things, and therefore as unacceptable to Lying Lester as it was to Ms. Rand!

But now, with talk of Rand Paul possibly running for president, the time may finally be right. Because Rand would run as a rEpublican, and, what with oBama being a horrible pResident (due to the obstruction of the rEpublican congress) and with the dEmocrats foolishly thinking the American people might agree that it is "time" for a Lady president - right after it was "time" fore a lazy Black man to be POTUS - the time could be right to elect a Libertarian.

A recent New York Times magazine story asks if the "Libertarian Moment" has finally arrived, pointing out that there are still many Americans who do not have a clear sense of what "libertarian" means... which means the rAbble is ripe for being fooled into voting for Rand.

And, with about one-in-ten Americans (11%) describing themselves as Libertarian and actually knowing what the term means (running the country for the benefit of the wealthy), Lying Lester is VERY optimistic that Rand could get elected if he wins the nomination.

Although, as with his father, there is practically zero chance of that happening. So, to hedge his bets, Lying Lester plans on voting for Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson if Rand Paul doesn't win the rEpublican nomination. That's two men versus one Lady. You may say Lying Lester's logic sounds like plan nonsense, but I am sure one of these Men will win if the only other choice is a chick.

Lying Lester has deluded himself into thinking "yes". The next president will most definitely be a Libertarian. Or the chances of this happening is quite good. If the American people can be fooled into thinking Rand's agenda is to shrink gOvernment so the rich can "create jobs". As opposed to his real agenda - which is also the Libertarian agenda - of shrinking gOvernment so the rich can destroy the middle class by stealing all their wealth.

Byline: This exercise in mental masturbation was jacked out by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of fantasies. LLIN-120.

PEW Research Says Republian Optimism Regarding The 2014 Midterms Is Warranted

With just over two months left until the 2014 midterm elections rEpublians remain optimistic while democrats are decidedly more pessimistic. Given the present national landscape and world turmoil it is not surprising nor unexpected.

The present national landscape being the fact that oBama is a lazy BLACK president. Coincidentally conforming to a racist stereotype dating back to the days of slavery. And the public rAbble is in agreement that the situation in Iraq with the followers of the false prophet mOhamed (ISIS) being 100 percent oBama's fault.

Due to his laziness. The American people surely have had enough of oBama's laziness and will vote in rEpublians to obstruct some more. That way even less will be certain to be accomplished during oBama's final years in office, for which oBama can be blamed. Then, the gullible rAbble will be sure to elect the White Male rEpublian nominee for POTUS in 2016. Or maybe Gary Johnson?

Anywho, American will realize it made a mistake by electing a lazy Black "man" (and I use the term loosely). No way they're going to make the same mistake twice. Or a similar one.

The dEmocrats are banking on the rAbble being fooled into thinking that 2016 is the right "time" to elect a woman POTUS... which makes Lying Lester laugh. Because, as we all know, a woman can't be president. Or shouldn't want to be, at least. That is according to Ayn Rand. A woman. So you know such sentiment can't be misogynist, just like my TRUTHFUL report concerning our BLACK pResident's laziness isn't racist.

Yes, not racist nor misogynist, just bullplop designed to fool the gullible rAbble into voting rEpublican. Although the rAbble that buys this bullplop is surely one or both of these things. Which is why rEpublican optimism is VERY warranted. Despite it taking two and a half terms, rEpublican obstructionism FINALLY seems to be paying off.

And now more of the rAbble are listening to the racist meme concerning oBama being lazy. Will the rAbble realizing it made a mistake in electing a Black president transfer over to them realizing they shouldn't make a mistake of electing a woman president?

Lying Lester hopes so. And, although I am neither a racist or a misogynist himself, it makes me smile when the rEpublians manipulate the gullible into blaming dEmocrats for rEpublian obstructionism and buying bullplop concerning oBama being "lazy".

So, while Lying Lester would prefer the rAbble vote Libertarian, voting rEpublian is better than voting for the sOcialist fascist pRogressive lEftist terrorist-coddling America-hating dEmocrats.

Byline: This excellent commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-119.

On Internet Trolls & Stalkers Targeting Lying Lester

Trolls are aplenty and certainly Lying Lester has a few that target him everywhere. It's just the price one pays for not "staying on the reservation" or for having independent views concerning the right of the wealthy to rule over us. And then there is the jealousy regarding Lying Lester's extreme Manliness, sexual prowess, and talent with the ladies (talent in bedding them, that is).

In any case I should note that, trolls, and their boorish behavior, are not limited to any particular political or philosophical view or party. Fact is, Lying Lester receives many missives a day from both pRogressive and rEpublican trolls, usually accusing me of being an "anti-Semite". All of which I send directly to Blogger's spam folder.

And the anonymous stalker never offers a single citation! No links, no quotes, not one shred of evidence... nothing! (no evidence that I'll publish, in any case).

Now, while it is true that I did admit saying "American Jews are the offspring of the pacifists that willing were led to the gas chambers in Hitlers Holocaust", obviously I was taken out of context!

The context in which is was meant, and was actually understood by all those who think and are interested in more than their sick destructive bullshit in their attempt to destroy the character of an honest and unbiased person was exactly the following...

The Jews, during the era of Adolph Hitler's bigoted and tyrannical REIGN of TERROR did not, based on my understanding of HISTORY (as taught by those responsible for teaching me) resist forcibly against the terror the idiot bastard rump Hitler was intent on inflicting upon the Jewish people.

My purpose was to point out the possibility of it happening anytime a people do not resist the tyranny of an hyper active ideologically driven politically agenda such as the pRogressive movement in America.

So, as you can see, I was slandering pRogressives by comparing them to Nazis. And, in regards to those who ask "is there any level of hyperbole that the delusional far rightwing conservative/reactionaries WON'T descend to?". I say "seemingly not".

But that has absolutely NOTHING to due with the fact that what we're talking about is Lying Lester descending to a level of hyperbole and delusion in his quest to slander pRogressives. Lying Lester is a Libertarian, and HIS hyperbole is the suggestion that a tyrannical pRogressive regime might roundup liberty-lovers such as myself and send them to concentration camps... and ultimately the gas chambers!

Which is why we (the liberty lovers) need to arm ourselves for that day when the pRogressive's jackbooted thugs come for us! Believe me, when that day comes Lying Lester will be ready, having accumulated a very large stockpile of weapons! And, if any sOcialist pRogressive enforcers try to disarm Lying Lester, or take him into custody for transport to a reprogramming camp, you can bet I'll take as many with me to the grave as possible!

Me pointing out that the Jews went willingly to the gas chambers is simply a warning against this course of action and in no way anti-Semitic. Even though it's total BS and there actually were many examples of Jewish people fighting back. No matter. It is a lie that was taught by those responsible for teaching me (as previously noted).

Anyway, Ayn Rand was a Jew. A Jew that changed her name from Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum - so I can't possibly be anti-Semitic! But did Ayn Rand change her name due to embarrassment for being Jewish? No, it was because Rand was a life-long atheist with a secular philosophy. "She was Jewish, but she always said her religion had no meaning to her" (according to a source I read).

So Ayn would have criticized those Jews who went willing to the gas chambers as well. And been with Lying Lester in agreeing that liberty-lovers should arm ourselves against the anti-liberty sOcialist lIberal pRogressives and their jackbooted thugs. Ms. Rand even wrote a novel (Atlas Shrugs) where a tyrannical socialist regime robs from it's productive citizens to give to the worthless Takers!

And, so what if Rand's fictional novel is self-serving claptrap from a wealthy-worshipping paranoid-delusional? And so what if a real threat to democracy would more than likely come from a fascist Rightwing authoritarian regime bought and paid for by our plutocrats? It isn't as if any of that would be bad... for the plutocrats. For a gullible and malleable rAbble to believe lies like Rand's would be good for them. And isn't that what we all want (what's good for the plutocrats)?

Anyway, that Lying Lester worships Ayn Rand obviously disproves this meme concerning Lying Lester being "anti-Semitic". Although, one could argue that a false claim concerning American Jews being the offspring of the pacifists that willing were led to the gas chambers in Hitlers Holocaust is anti-Semitic. And in regards to that accusation? Lying Lester says MAYBE. But it's anti-Semitism put to good use... to warn people about (fictitious) lIberal tyranny! (and is therefore only a White lie).

I mean, if the aMerican pEople were to accept that pRogressivism is actually in their best interest, then they might vote for the pRogressive agenda in greater numbers! And then those they elect might actually do something to guard against the REAL danger... the danger posed by the accumulation of large amounts of wealth in a small number of hands.

And - hard to believe - but some people actually do consider this a "danger"... but those people are just worthless Poors. Except for the Jews. Many of them seem to be in the middle and upper-middle classes (if you believe that stereotype, which Lying Lester does). But for some reason they refuse to acknowledge the fact that the wealthy SHOULD rule us!

Lying Lester cannot fathom why, but shame on these Jews for voting Democrat. The very fact that a large majority of American Jews have voted for the Democrat in the presidential election for the last 50 years (at least) is reason enough for Lying Lester to slander them with lies about their ancestors going willing to gas chambers!

Byline: This excellent and absolutely not anti-Semetic commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-118.

Lying Lester Explains Socialism in a Nutshell

The infantile and greedy socialists say "I'm here. I'm breathing. provide me". Or "provide FOR me".

Fascism in a nutshell consists of wealthy "job creators" telling almost the same thing to workers. What these "fascists" say is "I'm here and breathing and special due to being wealthy. You worthless workers need to toil for very low wages and let me keep most of the fruits of your labor".

Now, the question we have to ask ourselves is: which do we prefer? What system should we choose for running this great country? Obviously rational long term self interest - which isn't what many think it is - tells us that the answer is the later and not the former.

Why? Well, just look at a graph of the standard of living since the birth of Christ. As you can plainly see (if you Googled for and found this graph), it was essentially a flat line until the 1800s. And while we can obviously never know with certitude what the cause of this upturn was, it does seem rather convincing that it started to mushroom at the very same time that free markets, economic liberalization, free trade, the industrial revolution, and liberty also developed.

I mean, I know that this is a difficult thing for the socialists to accept but those looking at this graph can PLAINLY see that workers toiling for the benefit of our wealthy overlords benefits us all.

Some of us more than others, but in the end we all benefit. If you believe this BS about free markets, economic liberalization and free trade being solely responsible for the standard of living going up, that is. Which Lying Lester does. Or SAYS he does.

That would be as opposed to the truth about why the standard of living has gone up, which would be the technical advancements of generation upon generation (the industrial revolution being one such advance). I mean, as the collective knowledge of mankind increases over time, how could the standard of living NOT go up?

Even if the wealthy are siphoning off a large portion of the fruits of the common man's labor. The wealthy are generous enough to leave some crumbs for everyone else. And, of course, as the wealthy get richer and richer, the crumbs (proportionally) must also increase. At least for some. If not the rAbble might catch on. And in dEmocracies such as ours, that could be a problem.

Sure, free markets, economic liberalization and free trade *do* have something to do with the standard of living increasing. Although if the system wasn't being exploited by the wealthy to benefit themselves disproportionately, the standard of living for the average Joe could be a lot higher. Even for the third world wage slaves that often die due to poor working and living conditions.

But if not for their sacrifice - even if it is not a voluntary one, but one we must coerce them into (work for low wages or starve to death) - the wealthy would be slightly less wealthy. And nobody wants that, do they? I know I surely do not. What a horrible world this would be if The Rich and powerful could not exploit the Poor and powerless.

Lying Lester knows that it is not a world he would want to live in. But praise Ayn Rand that such a world existing is all but impossible... thanks in part to stooges like myself. And my buddy Will Hart, for whom I thank for his contribution to the authorship of this commentary.

Byline: This excellent commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation) AND Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyors of untruth and unfacts. LLIN-117.

Lying Lester Laughs At The Idea Of A Lady President

A Lady president? Apparently the dEmocrats think it is "time". Don't worry about earning the position or about actually being the best qualified person for the job. That was not a concern when the dEmocrats decided it was "time" for a Black president, after all.

In bArack oBama they selected a not-even-one-term Senator from IL. A former community organizer who "achieved" nothing in the private sector. And, although his educational achievements appear impressive, he refuses to release those transcripts. I wonder why. Perhaps he only "achieved" what he did due to affirmative action?

Given what a lazy pResident oBama has been, Lying Leser finds it hard to believe he achieved anything beyond organizing people to demand handouts from the gOvernment (isn't that what a "community organizer" does?). So, oBama, our first affirmative action pResident? Lying Lester thinks YES.

As for the next dEmocratic presidential hopeful, it has been decided that the time has come for a lady pResident. Many think that the job should go to Hillary Clinton. Because she is a former first lady who parlayed that "experience" into a Senatorship and then a disastrous stint as the current prez's secretary of state.

A position Hillary held when one of our nation's worst terrorist attacks occurred, I should note. I refer to Benghazi, of course. An attack during which the terrorists killed ambassador Christopher Stevens, among others. But Hillary did not even care, saying "what does it matter"?

Now it is Hillary's Turn to get her shot at the White House as the nation's first female candidate for president. That is, unless Elizabeth Warren challenges her. Either way the dEmocrats have decided to go for a lady, even if that lady lacks the necessary qualifications, or did a rump job while serving as one of oBama's secretaries.

Only because it is "time". Now, given how Ayn Rand viewed feminism, you know she would strongly disagree with this argument. Because there are strong strands of collectivism in feminism, Ayn Rand rejected it, and even went so far as to provocatively declare herself a "male chauvinist". Not that that makes any f*cking sense, but it is true.

Ayn argued that sexually, women should desire to engage in "hero worship", and that this required having at least one man to whom they could each look up to. For this reason she argued in her essay "About a Woman President" that a women should not want to be the commander-in-chief.

I, as an Objectivist and admirer of Miss Rand, defer to her judgment. A woman should not want to be president. And, even *if* I were inclined to vote for a lady president, it would surely not be either Hillary or Elizabeth, each of whom is completely unqualified in Lying Lester's opinion.

Being a First Lady or terrible sEcretary of sTate does not qualify one to be president! Should Hillary be able to ride her husband's coattails into the White House? Of course not. Even though she has ridden his coattails into the Senate and into the position of one of Obama's secretaries (and I refer NOT to the type of secretarial position that is appropriate for a woman to hold).

And Elizabeth Warren? Give me a break! She isn't even qualified to hold her current position. One which she has not been in for that long, remember. But like oBama the presidential buzz is suggesting she should run despite a resume that shows she is unqualified for the position of Commander-in-Chief.

So, who should one vote for come 2016? I say vote for Gary Johnson. He's a MAN and has the necessary qualifications to serve. Gary Johnson served as the 29th Governor of New Mexico from 1995 to 2003. In 1976 Gary founded Big J Enterprises, which grew from this one-person venture to become one of New Mexico's largest construction companies.

Experience running a state as Governor, and experience running a company in the private sector. And also a Man. Are these NOT the qualifications that we should be looking for in a Chief Executive?

So, come 2016 I say you should vote for Gary. He is more than qualified, and he's also not a Lady nor is he Black. I know Gary is the Man I'll be voting for. As would Ayn Rand, were she still with us. Of that I am sure.

Byline: This non-misogynist nor racist commentary was authored by Objectivism adherant and superior huMAN Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-116.

Why Lying Lester Believes Paying Taxes Should be 100 Percent Voluntary

Don't like paying taxes to the gOvernment? They you should not have to. The gOvernment taking tax money from you when you do not consent is THEFT (as explained by the video below).

And Lying Lester, like all believers in freedom and liberty, is opposed to theft. No matter who does it and no matter how the theft occurs. This includes theft that is justified by legislation our Congress passes that enables the "legal" collection of various taxes.

It is all very wrong in the opinion of Ayn Rand. The concepts of "society" and "democracy" are simply excuses used by the liberty-haters to justify this theft. Which is why Lying Lester hates both of these concepts. These are both evils used by our rulers and their sycophants to justify the taking of property that is not theirs.

And, if taxes were 100 percent voluntary (as they should be) you better believe that the size of gOvernment would shrink dramatically in a short period of time. And, as a result, many of our gOvernmental rulers would be out of a job.

Which would be a good thing. Because with these rulers out of the way, the wealthy (and therefore deserving) could step in and fill that void. Although this rule by the wealthy would benefit the wealthy, as opposed to benefiting "the people" (AKA the rAbble).

Which is the natural order of things, of course. Those who work hard (and smart) would achieve the most liberty. Ever hear the expression that involves cream rising to the top? Well, the reverse is true, and this explains why some people are (deservedly) poor.

Anyway... liberty. Everyone has the liberty to chose to be rich or chose to be poor, and the gOvernment thieving from people (taxing them) is evil. Only the rich should be able to thieve from poor people, by forcing the desperate to work for very low wages.

Byline: This excellent commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-115.

A Lying Lester Anthropogenic Climate Change Update

What the f*ck is "anthropogenic climate change" you might be wondering, given the fact that you are not as smart as Lying Lester. "Anthropogenic" refers to warming caused by human activity.

Climate change caused by human activity is, of course, a fantasy created by far lEft lIberals in order that the government might pass their fascist so-called "cap and trade" legislation. The purpose of this legislation is to confer upon our gOvernmental rUlers even MORE power.

As well as enrich those lIberals (like Al Gore) who have positioned themselves in order to make money off this ultimate greenscam. Not that they are not already greenscamming the public with crony capitalist boondoggles like Solyndra!

But under "cap and trade" the crony capitalism would be FAR worse! So, that this legislation has so far gone absolutely nowhere is a very good thing, praise the great Ayn Rand!

Although that this is a fantasy is not something I am positive about, given the fact that Lying Lester is not a scientist. But the rest concerning the power grabbing is something I *am* positive about. So, fantasy or the truth, that the cap-and-trade legislation going nowhere is still a very good thing, praise the great Ayn Rand!

Byline: This excellent commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of fantasies. LLIN-114.

Lying Lester Is A Ladies' Man. Make NO Mistake About It

Lying Lester recently read on another blog - with some amusement - scurrilous speculation that he might be gay. Why? Presumably because these people read my latest commentary on Gary Johnson.

A commentary in which I express my admiration for the 2012 Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson (and hopefully the 2016 one as well). Lying Lester wonders if these people are such homophobes that they immediately jump to the conclusion that a Man who admires another Man for his sane economic ideas is "gay".

It is utterly ridiculous, of course. No matter that I also expressed some admiration for Gary's physique. He is an older man in exceptional condition, after all. One would have to be blind not to notice how buff and handsome Mr. Johnson is. Whether the person noticing is a woman OR a man.

But these homophobes can't help but bash Lying Lester for his perceived "gayness", even when the exact opposite is true. Which is that Lying Lester is a Man's man and is only attracted to women. And has bedded literally hundreds of females.

Hundreds of women and zero men. Except for the one time. But that does not count because Lying Lester did not enjoy it. Much. But he tried it. Why? Didn't your mother always tell you that you can't know if you dislike something unless you try it? Lying Lester's mother did the same thing. Told him he should try something before he decided whether or not he liked it, that is. And Lying Lester respects his mother and does as she asks.

So Lying Lester, NOT being a homophobe did (try it). But just the one time. And he ultimately concluded that sex with women is much more enjoyable. For him, at least. Although Lying Lester might be willing to try sex with a man a second time *if* it were Gary Johnson who was the one doing the propositioning.

I say *might* because I know there is no possibility of this happening. At all. Which is OK with me. Especially given that I'm 100 percent straight. So I sometimes fantasize about making (another) exception for the dreamy Gary Johnson? So what? I am sure there are hundreds if not thousands of other straight guys who would make the same exception.

Other Libertarians like myself, for example. Libertarians who are attracted to Gary's sane fiscal policies of not over-taxing the wealthy, as well as his sane policies of not giving a shit about what goes on in other countries.

I mean poverty. Hell, I don't give a shit about that happening in our own country. But if they're saying mOhamed is cool in a majority-Muslim country? Then I say bomb them. But other than that we should stay out of their business.

But that is off the topic of accusations of Lying Lester being "gay", which he is not. I mean, if a Man has had sex with close to a thousand women and only one man - and that was in the past and he's (probably) never going to do it again (unless Gary Johnson offered) - then I say such an individual is definitely not gay.

But, hell, if homophobes want to spin my admiration for this outstanding Man into me being "gay"? Well, all Lying Lester has to say about that is that he simply does not give a shit what others might think.

He knows - given the number of women who have JUMPED at the chance to have sex with him, and how satisfied Lying Lester has left them - that he is not at all gay. Just a HUGE admirer of Gary Johnson. And all that shows is what good taste he has.

Byline: This excellent and 100-percent-not-gay commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth... and an EXTREMELY Manly ladies' Man. LLIN-113.

On the Rump Conclusion that a Gary Johnson Presidency Would "Crush" the Middle-Class

And this would work how exactly? And also, so what if it would?

Obviously to the pRogressive Leftists of the nation Johnson is public enemy #1. He doesn't fit their rump sTatist template. They believe that a gOvernment that gets out of the way and allows the rich to do as they please is bad? "Bad" only if you think that the gOvernment should provide services and ensure the rich don't get too powerful.

We're supposed to believe that allowing rich people to keep more of their own money is bad. And that removing the boot of the government from the throat of big businesses through fewer regulations and reduced licensing requirements (not allowing them to pollute and harm consumers) is also bad.

So, some Poors might die due to a lack of medical attention or starve or freeze to death. SO? These rump deadbeats should get jobs. A rich job creator will hire you if we chuck the minimum wage. I'm sure they can get by on the very low wages they deserve. And Also, so what if some workers are abused or even die; or some consumers die?

Also remember that Gary Johnson is opposed to sending our kids overseas to fight in these protracted idiotic conflicts. Which we won't have to do, so long as the flea and lice infested mUslins renounce mOhamed. Then we have no problem. Otherwise we should simply lob a few bombs over there. Not go to war.

And Gary would (of course) abolish the bailout culture and nix crony capitalism. Because if there is another collapse the rich folks can swoop in and buy up all the valuable assets for pennies on the dollar (which is what Romney argued in regards to GM). And who needs crony capitalism if the gOvernment just gets out of the way and lets the corporations abuse workers and pay them slave wages?

And Gary would also imprison fewer of the Black Poors by abolishing the rump drug-war. I mean, there is some serious money to be made if the corporations can get in on the action.

Lastly, "reforming" entitlements will only crush old people, and nobody gives a shit about them. I mean, if you did not invest wisely and have a nest egg, who cares if some rump old fart starves or freezes to death?

Folks, the way that I see it here, Gary Johnson would be a pretty darn good friend to the wealthy, and isn't that all that really matters? If you're in the upper middle class you'll do just fine. The lower middle class? Just like the rump Poors, who really cares if they're crushed?

Not Lying Lester. Fact is, I'd say these rumps deserve some crushing.

Byline: This excellent and completely non-rumpy commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason, and co-authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Thanks for the assist, Willis. LLIN-112.

Lying Lester Asks: Is America Becoming A Police State?

Eerily resembling Nazi Germany, Communist Russian, and most totalitarian police states. Is America next to join the long line of the all powerful sTate? Looks like maybe we can relax as for once there seems to be a developing consensus and unity that what happened in Ferguson is simply a bunch of no-good Black Poors getting what they deserve.

And who would complain about worthless Poors receiving a necessary beatdown (to keep them in their place)? Certainly not Lying Lester. In fact, such a thing makes him smile. Anyway, it now looks like the thug that was shot was guilty of a strongarm robbery involving some cigars!

What we have here is a lazy Poor thinking he can get what he wants by Taking it! So he got what he deserved. Although, by getting himself killed instead of sent to prison, he deprived the prison industry another inmate they could have billed the sTate for.

Now, you might think that Lying Lester, being a Libertarian, would not approve of an industry that subsists on tax dollars, but you would be wrong! Of course the taxpayers of the United States should pay for enforcing our laws.

But allowing the much more efficient private sector to handle the incarceration of said law breakers is a very good idea in Lying Lester's opinion. Perhaps the police force should be privatized as well?

Being a Libertarian I believe that most needs can and SHOULD be provided by the private sector. Because then rich folks can make a large profit doing it. And, with the rich in control, the power of the sTate would surely be decreased. While increasing the power of the wealthy, of course. But enriching the already wealthy and, at the same time handing off more power to them... well, isn't that something we are all desirous of?

Lying Lester knows he is VERY desirous of any course of action that would further empower the plutocrats. What about you? If you're smart you'll agree with Lying Lester. And with the great philosopher Ayn Rand as well. Rich people are the Atlases of the world, and therefore should rightly be in charge.

Byline: This excellent commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-111.

dEmocrats Looking To Midterms And 2016 Presidential Election Distancing Themselves From pResident oBbama

I am generally not a supporter of the dEmocratic agenda, it being way too progressive and starry eyed for me. I mean, dEmocrats believe they're elected to represent The People, as opposed to the people who matter. The rich ones, that is. This silly notion makes Lying Lester laugh.

But dEmocrats of late are distancing themselves from our sOcialist POTUS fearing he will hurt rather than help their election or reelection chances in 2016. Could this mean the dEmocratic party is really more conservative than the pResident whose whose whose whose choice for the democratic nomination in 2016 is Senator Elizabeth Warren, the ultra progressive senator from Massachusetts?

Or does it mean the party base is becoming even more pRogressive and believe (rightly or wrongly) America wants a president more pRogressive than Obama has been? Lying Lester says NO.

According to a recent McClatchy-Marist poll the President is hurting democrats because of his lIberal as well as inconsistence policies. And this very good news for rEpublicans going into the 2014 midterm elections makes Lying Lester smile.

Smile because Libertarians aren't even running for many of these positions and Lying Lester is a realist, and admits that a rEpublican is preferable to a dEmocrat. WAY preferable. Although, personally, I'm still backing Gary Johnson for president in 2016 (if he runs), even though I realize Gary has absolutely no chance at all (there is a ZERO percent possibility that Gary Johnson could be elected president. NONE).

Given this unfortunate reality, a rEpublican POTUS would be preferable to ANY dEmocratic candidate - and ABSOLUTELY preferable to the sOcialist Warren. Which is why Lying Lester pushes this (more than likely false) rumor of oBama backing Warren.

It has the effect of making oBama look more lIberal than he actually is (oBama, in reality being a Conservative Blue Dog dEmocrat). But Lying Lester LIKES (very much) the lie that oBama is a far lEft sOcialist lIberal.

And, the rIght has done an excellent job of brainwashing the public into believing that they too could be rich, and therefore they don't want taxes on rich folks to be high. Because they too could be rich one day (HA!).

Or taxing the "job creators" will destroy jobs because taxes that are too high will disincentivize the rich from hiring. Why bother hiring workers and making more money if doing so will only make you richer instead of super rich? Or whatever reason sounds good for keeping taxes on rich people low. The Poors seem to buy this BS. But then, they aren't that smart, are they? If they were they wouldn't be poor.

In any case, something tells me this could be why President Obama is hitting the links so often and likely keeping the ibuprofen or aleve close at hand. He realizes the lies and ongoing obstruction are working.

That, and he's a stereotypical lazy Black man. BTW, how much you want to bet that some PC lIberal reading my accurate comment about the laziness of Blacks might respond by calling Lying Lester a "racist"?

It isn't racist if it's true. And Lying Lester is a White Man who has the BALLS to acknowledge the TRUTH. Just as I acknowledge the truth about Muslims being lice and flea infested.

Byline: This excellent and totally non-racist commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-110.

Announcing a New Lying Lester Blog: "Gary Johnson is Dreamy"

As my regular readers well know, I spend a lot of time discussing perennial Libertarian candidate for president Gary Johnson - and my strong desire to see him installed in the White House.

On this topic, Lying Lester is proud to announce a new blog where there is only ONE topic of discussion, and that topic is Gary Johnson! The name of the blog is "Gary Johnson is Dreamy", which he IS!

And I mean that in a totally non-gay way. Can a Man view another Man as "dreamy" and not be gay? It would be hard to imagine. Hard, unless the man in question is Gary Johnson. Gary's Manly magnetism is so strong that even totally straight and very Manly Men such as myself cannot help but feel an attraction to him.

I mean, this is something that Lying Lester has had to deal with himself, being as incredibly Manly as I am. Straight guys "admiring" me, that is. So I know what it must feel like for Gary. Although Lying Lester has NEVER felt this way about another man himself (NEVER).

Until he became aware of Gary Johnson, that is. Although most of the time I only feel incredible admiration for this Man (and only occasionally an attraction). But that is neither here nor there, as I likely will never meet Mr. Johnson (unless he selects me as his VP). And he also has a significant other.

A woman. Gary's significant other is a woman. Just as Lying Lester's significant other is. A woman, that is. Still, if Lying Lester were gay and Gary Johnson was gay...

No matter, seeing as neither of us are. Gay, that is. No, we're both completely straight. Not only that, but we're both chick magnets. But there is nothing wrong with one Manly Man admiring another Manly Man. Nothing at all.

Which is why I started "Gary Johnson is Dreamy". Check it out if you feel the same way I do about Gary Johnson. I'm talking about wanting him to be president and nothing else (perverts!).

If you strongly desire a Libertarian like Gary to take the White House in 2016 (and, perhaps, sometimes think about Gary "taking" you) JOIN me on "Gary Johnson is Dreamy" and we'll discuss our mutual admiration of the Man who ought to be our next president.

Byline: This excellent and 100 percent not gay commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-109.

Lying Lester Asks: Will The Earth And Life As We Know It Send?

Will the earth, and life as we know it send? If not my our own hands perhaps by matter from outer space? Lying Lester seriously does not know, but believes it is a question worth pondering.

What I'm talking about, for those lesser-intelligenced among my readers, is the possibility that man might travel into space and even establish colonies on other planets in the future.

Will earth scientists figure out how to make faster than light travel a reality, or will friendly aliens - and by "aliens" I mean lifeforms from other planets, and not the dirty scum that cross our border illegally (the people the stupid PC lIberals like to call "undocumented workers") - help us out by providing us with the technology?

Will life as we know it eventually send humanity rocketing into space and to other planets, or is such speculation merely the stuff of science fiction?

Byline: This excellent and absolutely not-typed-while-drunk commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-108.

A Nation Held Hostage By Gridlock, Thankfully

While the following is somewhat partisan and slightly tilted leftward, it does, at the same time, speak to the truth. Only a complete non partisan with an inability to see and acknowledge the truths that are evident in the article would say otherwise. False narratives have a way of confusing the electorate and ultimately winning the war.

Politico... Vocabulary.com defines a grifter as: A grifter is a con artist - someone who swindles people out of money through fraud. If there's one type of person you don't want to trust, it's a grifter: Someone who cheats someone out of money. Historically, grifters have taken many shapes. They were the snake-oil salesmen who rolled into town promising a magical, cure-all elixir at a price. The grifter was long gone by the time people discovered the magical elixir was no more magical than water. Over the last few years we have seen the rise of a new grifter—the political grifter. And the most important battle being waged today isn't the one about which party controls the House or the Senate, it's about who controls the Republican Party: the grifting wing or the governing wing. (Link).

For certain a segment of the rEpublican party (the Tea Party wing) has little interest in governing and is banking on its sheeple to not notice their grifting until it's too late and they have profited and vanished. Ted Cruz appears to be on the way to becoming it's most influential grifter.

Although there is something to be said for gridlock. Something positive, that is. As a commenter on my blog pointed out "without gridlock, we'd have bigger deficit-busting, job-killing stimulus packages; the secret ballot in union elections would have been abolished; and the ACA would have been a much bigger monster".

Surely there is some truth in that statement. To overcome this gridlock the Libertarians and rEpublicans need to CONVINCE the electorate WHY it should embrace their vision for America. Lying Lester suggests they start with a little more lying and appearing to be straightforward with them while continuing to follow their plan that will work for ALL of America that matters, the 2% and NOT her 320 million inhabitants.

Byline: This excellent commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-107.

A Lying Lester False Narrative Regarding dEmocrats and Impeachment Talk

Just wondering how many individuals realized that, according to The Hill, "Congressional Democrats have talked about the impeachment of President Obama 20 times more than Republicans have on the House and Senate floors".

I'm willing to bet not many. I know I didn't. So, it appears the democrats view keeping talk of impeachment on the front burner to be a great way to snag those donor dollars and ignite, or perhaps incense is a better word, the lEftist base of the dEmocrat party.

I guess when there ain't all that much positive going for your party going into an election year you take what you can get. In any case, I gotta give credit where credit is due, and the dEms seem more effective of late at exploiting the absurd.

The absurdity of the obstructing rEpublican congress actually impeaching Obama, as many within the Tea Party wish to do, or the absurdity of Lying Lester suggesting that Tea Partiers actually suggesting impeachment should NOT be talked about by the dEmocrats.

One of these is actually absurd and the other is not. But Lying Lester chooses (as he always does) to push the false narrative on his other blog, rAtional nAtion uSA.

But are the American people dumb enough to fall for this false narrative? Lying Lester hopes they are, and oBama's falling poll number seriously suggest that they are. All good news in this Libertarian blogger's opinion.

Because the more false narratives and total bullshit regarding our current POTUS that the American people can be sold, the greater the likelihood that our next President will not be a dEmocrat.

And, while Lying Lester is pulling for Gary Johnson, or whomever the Libertarian candidate might be (Lying Lester, perhaps?), a rEpublican pResident would not be as bad as another sOcialist - and you know Ayn Rand would agree.

Byline: This false narrative was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-106.

Lying Lester Admits His Hate & Bigotry For Muslims

Yes, it is true. I hate Muslims. However, only the Muslims who acknowledge mOhamed as a prophet. Any Muslim that acknowledges that mOhamed (piss be upon him) raped and pillaged is A-OK in my book. They (if there are any such mUslims*) are among the good ones.

*Note: There are no such mUslims. Lying Lester therefore hates ALL mUslims. Except his "mUslim friends"... who don't actually exist. I made them up and imagined that they disavowed mOhamed. (They are MADE UP, so I can imagine any damn illogical thing about them I wish).

And surely, that I have mUslim friends is PROOF that I am not a bigot!

Byline: This excellent and totally non-bigoted commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth... and also not a bigot. LLIN-105.

Lying Lester Ponders The Possibility of a 3rd World War With The mUslims

The lEftists do not have the will to do what it will take to eliminate the threat of the viscous barbaric mUslin terrorists, as discussed in my previous post. So, what do we do?

We put together a coalition of rational western nations along with eastern nations who are sane and want terror stopped. Pool remeasures and plan a concerted strategy to take out the terrorists in their hiding places everywhere.

Then, the sane rational world lets the terrorist states and organizations know that a strike of any kind on any member nation is a strike on all, and any will unleash such destruction on them they'll wish they were never born!

Lying Lester says you're either with us or you're against us! This includes any radical aMerican lEftist scum; in particular lEftist politicians, who MUST be voted out of office. Whether that means voting Libertarian, rEpublican, or sane dEmocrat, just so long as the radical pRogressive terrorist-coddling lEftists are REMOVED!

Then, with the irrationals having no voice in the decision, we can go to WAR with the terrorists and terrorism supporters (our own "jihad", if you will). And, in regards to the mUslims who we might wage war with... how do we know which are with us and which are against us?

Lying Lester believes that moderate Muslins, in concert throughout the world MUST stand tall and renounce all terrorism, acknowledge that the "prophet" muhammad was a evil man who raped, plundered and pillaged - then maybe I might believe they want to live in peace with non Muslims.

And, is that too much to ask? That all mUslins who do not wish to be targeted for annihilation by the forces of righteousness (the coalition previously mentioned) renounce the founder of their rEligion?

Yes, it is true that mUslims believe that the their holy book, the Quran, was verbally revealed from God to Muhammad through the angel Gabriel... so I guess that means that if they renounce mOhamed that they are also renouncing iSlam... but so what?

And such an action would surely have these mOhamed renouncing mUslims labeled infidels - but again, so what? It isn't as if we're talking about cHristianity or Judaism, the superior rEligions, is it?

Superior in that they are more peaceful, that is. Being an atheist Lying Lester believes there is something wrong with anyone who chooses to believe in an imaginary invisible friend in the sky... but if that kind of bullshit is your thing - at LEAST belong to one of the peaceful rEligions, for Ayn Rand's sake!

Which is why, what Lying Lester is REALLY calling for is the abolishment of iSlam. He knows this. But the mUslims who want to live will comply and abandon this vile rEligion founded by the eVil mOhamed.

Be killed or convert. That is the only choice we should be offering these filthy flea-infested as*sholes. They MUST renounce the founder of their rEligion, an evil man who raped, plundered, and pillaged. If not? Then we will should absolutely KILL THEM ALL!!!!

Byline: This excellent and TOTALLY non-bigoted commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation, Purveyor of Islamaphobia). I have mUslim friends, for crying out loud! So I couldn't possibly be bigoted against them (the non-radical but still flea-infested ones, that is). LLIN-104.

Iraq and the oBama Almost Strategy

President Obama, in his signature style is taking quarter measures to prevent immediate genocide by the ISIS in Iraq. Neither pResident oBama or the western democracies are will to admit that the terrorist networks that adhere to the cult of iSlam are determined to take control of the mIddle eAst as well as the entire globe. Until they do, and take the necessary military action to crush every single one of the filthy lice ridden barbaric terrorist organizations this problem will forever be with us all.

Even democratic Senator Feinstein recognizes "It takes an army to defeat an army". However she stopped short of addressing the core of the problem or offering any serious alternatives to the pResident's response. And, even though Lying Lester opposed the initial invasion of Iraq, he must admit now that the only serious alternative that now exits would be to re-invade iRaq.

That, or simply nuke it... although the world community would likely condemn the US for such an action and label oBama a "war criminal"... and, although US presidents have a history of getting away with war crimes, this "war crime" is likely one that the rest of the world would not tolerate.

So, the only answer appears to be going back to iRaq and occupying it again. Although, short of nuking them, I'm sure we could get away with a little SHOCK & AWE before our troops hit the ground and start slaughtering every Muzzie they see! What I'm saying is that I think we need to KILL KILL KILL as many of these dirty flea-infested towel-headed goat-f*cking camel-jockey sand-monkeys as we possibly can using conventional weapons.

Frankly, and in all honesty, Lying Lester would like to see these mOhamed-worshiping vermin wiped from the face of the earth, and that INCLUDES the so-called "innocents". Hell, Lying Lester would strangle an "innocent" Muzzie baby in it's crib with his bare hands if given the opportunity! Or, I'd take a machine gun and mow down as many "innocent" Muzzie females in their beekeeper's getups I could target!

But our current lEftist pResident obviously does not have the balls to do what needs to be done. Which would be to re-invade with the objective of putting down as many of these rabid flea and lice infested Osama-loving carpet-piloting Abduls as possible.

Byline: This excellent and totally non-bigoted commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Islamaphobia. LLIN-103.

Lying Lester Condemns Radical lEftists & Their Support For Hamas!

Will the "peaceful" adherents of a violent "religion" ever denounce it's militarist violent creator? The religion of "peace", iSlam, continues to metastasize into an ever growing and more virulent force for evil and bloodshed in the Middle East, indeed throughout the world.

And evil lEftists the world over embrace "tolerance" and understanding for these extremists and monsters of inhumanity who worship mOhamed, the qUran and aLlah. But it is all a sham. Lying Lester knows these lEftists are actually in league with the terrorists.

Because these flea-infested towel-headed barbarians hate America and want to overthrow democracy - just as much as the radical lEftist sOcialists hate and want to overthrow democracy. This is why the extreme irrational lEft will no doubt continue to trip over themselves trying to find a way to assign responsibility to the west for the barbaric actions of the haters of rEligious freedom and lovers of tyranny.

And, even though this alone is enough to cause even those with an iron stomach to become ill and vomit - MARK MY WORDS, it is going to get worse, much worse. The solution? Lying Lester has pondered this question long and hard and decided that the worshipping of this rEligion of evil should be outlawed in the United States. Yes, I believe in free speech and the exercise of it, no matter how stupid the speech.

But "free speech" that supports evil and murder is another thing. I mean, one group cannot go around threatening death to another group of people and call that "free speech", which is what the adherents of iSlam do.

Lying Lester, frankly, will not be satisfied until every last mUslim denounces their faith and converts to atheism. Or Christianity. Although I'd prefer they acknowledge there is no gOd. But, if you're going to worship an imaginary being in the sky, let it at least be one who does not command you to murder those who do not share your specific irrational beliefs.

Do we not all want America to remain a free country where the wealthy are able to accumulate more and more wealth? More wealth then they could possibly ever use or need? Of course we do.

And, should we not ALL support Israel in their fight against this rEligion of pure evil? I mean, Judaism is a rEligion that is just as fake - in that they worship an imaginary sky being as well - but AT LEAST the adherents of this rEligion of invisible imaginary friend worshippers don't promise death to all those who disagree with them.

Which is why Lying Lester believes there are no "innocents" who worship iSlam and that the killing any mUslim by Israel in this conflict is acceptable and even justified. The inhabitants of pAlestine should rise up overthrow Hamas - and the killing will stop.

If they did that then how could there not be peace? No, instead the inhabitants of pAlestine vote for Hamas to be their government! Could there be no clearer indication that this is a fight they desire? That said, Lying Lester believes that the pAlestinians really only have themselves to blame for the deaths of any of their citizens due to Israeli rockets.

For this reason I say it is time for carpet bombing scorched earth tactics. Lying Lester isn't one to agree with people on the far Right such as Ann Coulter - who once said that the USA should nuke the mIddle eAst and turn it into glass - but Lying Lester thinks he agrees with Ann on this. We SHOULD kill, kill, KILL every last mUslim!!!

So, shut up lEftists and stop defending a rEligion of evil. But Lying Lester knows you will not because you are JUST as evil. You are NOT concerned with the deaths of "innocents"... you likely celebrate them as much as Hamas does!

Byline: This truthful commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Islamaphobia. LLIN-102.

Lying Lester Asks: Is High Speed Rail Feasible Or A sOcialist Pipe Dream?

Having high speed efficient rail is a dream come true - in sOcialist Europe. Here in the USA we remain if not light years behind Europe certainly we are stuck in the technology of yesteryear. Perhaps this is because Europe simply sees more value in high speed rail, it is after all more efficient than the personal automobile. Maybe Europe is not so tied up in paradigms created through years of habit as the USA?

But Lying Lester suspects that if the American people wanted high speed efficient rail - and were willing to pay for it - high speed rail service would become a reality in the USA. High speed efficient rail service is extremely costly. While the ideal situation would be for private capital to build and operate a high speed rail system in America it is not practical due to regulatory constraints. Therefore no private sector company - even if it had the capital - would do so.

Which is why we must do away with these rEgulations and red tape that are preventing high speed rail in the United States. Only by allowing our wealthy overlords to build and then profit tremendously from this endeavor will high speed rail ever become a reality in the United States.

It would pain me to say that for an endeavor of the magnitude of high speed rail service to ever become reality in the USA it will require a a population desirous of it as well as one wiling to pay for it through taxation - which is why I REFUSE to say such a thing.

No, high speed rail, should we ever have it in the United States, MUST be built by the private sector. Europe has made it happen and Europeans are quite happy with their world class high speed rail system. America, being the exceptional nation we have become to believe we are ought to be able to out do the Europeans. Shouldn't we?

And should we not be able to do it the American way? Which would be to build it not by taxing our citizens and then providing for them a needed service at a reasonable price, but by clearing away the red tape and allowing the capitalists to build and profit from it?

Just remember that sOcialism is NEVER the answer and arguments that say government-funded high speed rail would benefit us by providing for improved transportation at a reduced cost that positively impacts the environment should be REJECTED!

Lying Lester strongly believes that if the capitalists cannot profit (and PROFIT big time) then high speed rail should never come to the USA. Remember that high-speed rail was one of the ways our sOcialist POUTS thought he could show us that that government is capable of doing big things?

Well, as it turns out thus far he has proved just the opposite, what with the rEpublicans obstructing him in Congress and rEpublican governors rejecting sOcialist funding for such projects. Let us hope that they continue to do so.

Byline: This free market championing commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-101.

Lying Lester Suspects $619 Billion oBama Heist

$619 billion in greenbacks missing from the federal budget. That is to say just how the $619 billion, covering 320 federal programs was spent is a mystery. There apparently exists no accounting of the $619 billion.

Where did this money go? Could it be that our pResident, the man (and I use the term loosely) known as bArack hUssein oBama be behind the disappearance of this money?

Could it be - and this is just a theory - that our dEmocrat pResident does not us to know where this money went because he handed it out to his cronies? Perhaps when this pResident leaves office he will be getting some of it back when he is "hired" for a no work job by one of those grateful cronies?

Surely these plutocratic cronies are pumping money into dEmocrat campaigns as we speak. It is a tit-for-tat that they expect. Not that rEpublicans do not do the same... but on this scale? Surely this level of corruption is unprecedented.

That is, if this is simply not a case of negligent accounting. But Lying Lester thinks that it might very well be the case that it is the other thing. That is, to say, this money has been stolen. Which, if that IS what is going on, would make this one of the largest heists in history.

And, although this is a major issue, or at the very least it should be considered as such, does the fact it MIGHT have happened really surprise anyone? When the federal government views it's taxpaying citizens as a never ending and bottomless money pit isn't this the kind of corruption we should expect?

And, did not Ayn Rand warn us of this kind of thing? It is government by the parasites and for the parasites! What to do? Lying Lester strongly suggests voting for Gary Johnson in the next presidential election. I know that's what I'm going to do.

Frankly, electing Gary is the ONLY hope our great nation has of staying great. And by "staying great", I mean isn't it great that those at the top have most of the money? And don't we all want things to STAY that way?

Not that the Obama heist threatens this too much. I mean, these cronies Obama is distributing OUR money to are rich, after all. But Lying Lester still disapproves. This is NOT the Libertarian way. The Libertarian way involves the gOvernment getting out of the way so the Wealthy can rape and pillage and screw workers.

The Libertarian way does NOT involve the gOvernment acting as a middleman between the workers or environment to be raped and the wealthy rapists. These are things our wealthy overlords can do withOUT any help, thank you.

The only reason those in gOvernment want to interject themselves is because they want a piece of the action and the only way they can get it (our pOliticians) is because they couldn't make it in the business world.

These pOliticians are Takers; lice and parasites no better than those who line up for the free goodies they distribute! "Free" goodies paid for with the tax dollars of those of us who WORK... people like Lying Lester!

Which is why it is so important that us Makers vote for Gary Johnson the next time out. Vote for Gary or surrender to the parasites. Ayn Rand would vote for Gary and so should you. If you're not a Taker, that is.

Byline: This excellent commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-100.

Lying Lester Asks: Is The Republican Congress Likely To Continue New Deal Era Corporate Welfare?

He he he. This is a good one. A recent article from the National Review Online highlights the "reality" that rEpublicans are, and have been "as supportive" of crony capitalism and corporate welfare as dEmocrats.

You get what they're saying... they're saying that it's the dEmocrats who are the crony capitalists and that the rEpublicans are just "supportive" of it. The dEmocrats, so this Tall Tail goes, started cronying back during the days of FDR. Crony capitalism is a product of FDR's New Deal!

This despite FDR saying that the economic royalists hated him, and he welcomed their hatred - that was actually all baloney. FDR actually was cronying HARD, and the "New Deal" was a new deal for deceiving the public and enriching the plutocrats.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. You've got to hand it to Libertarians, this is genius! Blame the dEmocrats for what the rEpublicans are responsible for! Everyone knows that it's the rEpublicans who are wholly in the pockets of big business.

It wasn't until Bill Clinton and his "third way" that the Corporate dEmocrats emerged. The "third way" was the dEmocrats saying "hey, we want some of that plutocrat bribe money too!".

But this muddying of the waters and rewriting of history by the Libertarians is a great idea in Lying Lester's opinion. I mean, blame both rEpublican and dEmocrats for what is actually a lIbertarian goal, which would be empowering our wealthy overlords.

Although, Libertarians don't want the gOvernment to act as a middleman, collecting the taxes and doling out the goodies. NO! Libertarians like me want gOvernment to get out of the way so our beloved oligarchs can get to raping and abusing workers and the public with nothing to stop them.

No pesky minimum wage! The lower classes should be forced to work for a low low wage. How low? Well, how low can you go? With an overabundance of workers the rules of supply and demand tell us that that wage can go VERY low.

This would be a good thing, obviously. Because, if the plutocrats could get away with paying slave wages, well, obviously they'll make more (become wealthier).

And worker protections? Why the hell do we need those? If a worker is injured or killed on the job what's the big deal? As I just pointed out - there is an overabundance of workers. Just kick that injured or dead worker to the curb and hire a new one!

Poor laborers are a dime a dozen (or they should be) so WHY should our wealthy corporate masters give a crap if some are hurt or killed on the job. Answer: they should absolutely not. Because caring would (and currently does) cost them money. Money that could go into their pockets!

So Lying Lester supports this lie 110 percent. Convince the ignorant public that ALL politicians are dirty - and work especially hard to place extra blame on the pArty least responsible for the cronyism that infects our body politic... and then, perhaps they'll decide to bring in the Libertarians to "fix" the problem.

Lying Lester thinks it could work. Heck, we should at least give it a shot. There are always other lies we can tell to deceive the public into voting for policies that will harm them (while enriching the already wealthy).

Remember, it's all about concentrating wealth at the top. And, any lie that furthers that noble goal is a good lie. You KNOW Ayn Rand would agree.

Byline: This excellent commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-099.

The Least Hard Working President... And Other Lies

There is something to be said for hard work and dedication to achieving results, even when it means schmoozing with those you disagree with and compromising when necessary. Especially when you are the leader. President Ronald Reagan and President William Jefferson Clinton knew this. So have all other effective presidents.

I wonder why President Barack Obama doesn't get about the hard work and all the other stuff as well... Or, that is the meme I have been hearing over and over from dishonest Conservatives... and I LIKE it. Which is why I have decided to repeat it, despite the fact that it is completely false.

Much like the meme that Obama is "inexperienced", or the one that says Congressional Republicans AREN'T obstructing. Obama simply can't sell his agenda, due to it being bad and/or not being a good convincer... both due to his lack of experience.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. I LOVE it! rEpublicans obstruct the pResident, preventing him from accomplishing anything... then they blame oBama for not accomplishing anything... and the gullible eat it up! I am quite hopeful that this duplicitous strategy pays off in 2016. I mean, if the American people are dumb enough to buy this garbage, perhaps they're dumb enough to vote for Gary Johnson?

Shhhh... what the real purpose of this "lazy oBama" bullshit is - is to counter the actual reality of the rEpublican Congress doing nothing. This is just the rEpublicans (and their brain dead supporters) saying "nuh-uh" in defiance of obvious truths. That they are the lazy ones.

BTW, I posted about this on my other blog, and I've already got one gulible commenter agreeing with me on this nonsense!

Not only that, but he throws in some racist dog whistles as well, referring to our pResident as an "indolent and lazy man, who shows passion for few causes other than really nasty ones (like his attempt to abolish the secret ballot for union elections)".

Cool beans. While not a racist like this commenter, Lying Lester still very much appreciates race being used as a cudgel against this pResident, which is why he lied about the pResident being "lazy". ANYTHING to stymie his agenda is OK with me.

I do not believe you achieve the level of success that Mr. oBama has by being "lazy". Only a total idiot would agree with this unbelievably stupid meme. But, as the commenter I just quoted shows, there are people who are that stupid. And those people are usually racist to boot.

Hopefully this will help my side when it comes to the 2016 election. Will Gary Johnson run? Will the racists (like the commenter above) vote Johnson? Oddly enough, they might. Even though Johnson presents himself as being opposed to racism.

But these racists are the kind of racists who think they aren't racists. If that makes any sense. But very few people who are racists will actually admit it. And of course Gary's agenda would GREATLY empower the plutocrats... so someone who agrees with that agenda - even if they have a buttload of unconscious racism - might vote for Gary anyway.

I mean, surely no dEmocrat and even no rEpublican would, if elected president, be as STRONG a champion for the wealthy as Gary. I know that's why I'm voting for him. If he runs. If not, I might just run myself.

Surely I would be a excellent alternative if Gary decides not to run. I am, after all, very much in favor of the Libertarian agenda of concentrating wealth at the top... just like Gary.

And I'd lie about it like all Libertarians do. Deregulating and cutting the social safety net will be good for everyone (wink, wink). And I'll lie about oBama being "lazy" as well. If it furthers the cause - there is, frankly, no lie I won't tell. Even ones that dog whistle to the racists.

Byline: This post was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of dog whistles (such as calling a Black man lazy). LLIN-098.