Just wondering how many individuals realized that, according to The Hill, "Congressional Democrats have talked about the impeachment of President Obama 20 times more than Republicans have on the House and Senate floors".
I'm willing to bet not many. I know I didn't. So, it appears the democrats view keeping talk of impeachment on the front burner to be a great way to snag those donor dollars and ignite, or perhaps incense is a better word, the lEftist base of the dEmocrat party.
I guess when there ain't all that much positive going for your party going into an election year you take what you can get. In any case, I gotta give credit where credit is due, and the dEms seem more effective of late at exploiting the absurd.
The absurdity of the obstructing rEpublican congress actually impeaching Obama, as many within the Tea Party wish to do, or the absurdity of Lying Lester suggesting that Tea Partiers actually suggesting impeachment should NOT be talked about by the dEmocrats.
One of these is actually absurd and the other is not. But Lying Lester chooses (as he always does) to push the false narrative on his other blog, rAtional nAtion uSA.
But are the American people dumb enough to fall for this false narrative? Lying Lester hopes they are, and oBama's falling poll number seriously suggest that they are. All good news in this Libertarian blogger's opinion.
Because the more false narratives and total bullshit regarding our current POTUS that the American people can be sold, the greater the likelihood that our next President will not be a dEmocrat.
And, while Lying Lester is pulling for Gary Johnson, or whomever the Libertarian candidate might be (Lying Lester, perhaps?), a rEpublican pResident would not be as bad as another sOcialist - and you know Ayn Rand would agree.