Feminazis Need To Accept The Fact That Men R Superior & Halt Their Persecution Agenda!

My thoughts on nature and equality are that the former never got the memo about the latter and it is highly doubtful that it ever will (nonstop social-engineering notwithstanding). Obviously men are biologically superior to women, explaining why they are in charge and make more money.

Radical Marxist feminists (AKA feminazis), via their nonstop social-engineering, think they can change this reality. Their agenda being a flipping of the script. Something they have been successful at to a frightening degree. Which explains why in today's society men are the sex being persecuted and oppressed!

The feminazis' tactics include falsely accusing men of rape, falsely accusing men who they've had sex with of fathering their bastard kids (when they likely got inseminated by some lesbo using an infant medicine syringe and the sperm of some gay dude - resulting in the indentured servitude of innocent men), and whining about a "patriarchy" that doesn't exist!

P.S. And, no, I don't live in Europe or CanaDUH so you can't arrest me. Sorry.

Image: Picture I found that does a good job of relating the facts regarding the many ways in which a man's brain is superior to a woman's. Excellent graphic, with the exception of crediting an imaginary "God".

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-244.

If I Were A Serial Killer? My Victims Would Be Leftist Buffoons!

On TV programs or movies when the bad guy is a serial killer, the victims are usually prostitutes. If I were a serial killer, however? My victims would be Leftist buffoons. Not that I am even thinking of becoming a serial killer. I'm not. But if I were? The following people would DEFINITELY be on my kill list...

Stephen Colbert (a Leftist media buffoon who should quit so a woman can have his job), Barney Frank (a clueless crony-capitalist), Melissa Harris-Perry (a pseudo-intellectual, insular, pretentious, and virulent Leftist buffoon), Paul Krugman (a Leftist economist buffoon who laughably suggests an alien invasion would be beneficial), Chris Matthews (a hard-core partisan fool), John Oliver (a Leftist media buffoon who criticizes Donald Trump but not Hillary Clinton), Franklin Delano Roosevelt (a loathsome buffoon who I'd like to time travel to murder), as well as Comrade Bernie Sanders (not just a socialist but a dumb one).

If I could only chose one of the above to rape and murder? My first choice would be FDR (a truly evil man). But to kill him I'd need a time machine. But, since time machines don't exist, I'll go with Paul Krugman. Seriously, can you believe this fucking imbecile won a Nobel prize for economics?!! Yeah, hard to believe it wasn't for buffoonery! That's the one I'd have awarded him, as he SURELY deserves it.

Byline: This list was compiled by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of compiling lists of buffoons I'd like to brutally murder. LLIN-243.

Radical Marxist Feminists Whining About "Patriarchy" Piss Me Off!

American women didn't have the right to vote til 1919. Yeah, that was bad. But you know what else was? Try the fact that men got drafted and served up as disposable fodder for a bunch of moronic wars (the Mexican-American War, the Civil War, the Spanish-American War, the Philippine War, and WW1). I mean, you can't cast a ballot when you're dead, right?

Further proof that this "patriarchy" nonsense is just that. Total BS being peddled by the Marxist feminists (who I hate). Men going to war and dying while women got the easy job of keeping up the household and raising the kids (while the man pays the bills)? It makes me want to puke. How easy women have had it, that is.

These ungrateful bitches should be thanking men for allowing them to take advantage of them for so long. But women taking advantage of men is the norm, being the weaker sex. Or lazier sex (more like it). Patriarchy is supposedly "a social system in which males hold primary power, predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege and control of property".

I say "patriarchy" is, however, a system where the women have tricked the men into doing most of the work while they take it easy (shopping, eating bon-bons while relaxing, etc). And then, when the men (rightly) demand payment for their work, these bitches falsely accuse the men of rape! How pathetic are women?

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-242.

Message To Hillary Clinton: I Hate Your Mother-F*cking Corrupt Pandering Pantsuit-Wearing Guts!

Does Hillary Clinton read this blog? I doubt it. If she does, however, I'd like to take this opportunity to let her know that I hate her mother-fucking corrupt pandering pantsuit-wearing POS lawyer guts with the intensity of an octillion hydrogen bombs detonating after being fired into the sun!

Frankly, I doubt I've ever felt this intensely regarding any human being who has ever lived, except for Bernie Sanders. Which means that I hate Hillary almost as much as I hate Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt, the two wickedest and most power-mad individuals to ever hold the office of POTUS/CIC.

The problem with crooked Hillary is that the evidence shows she could be just as evil, IMO. I mean, the bitch accepts Saudi money via her "Global Initiative" slush fund (all the while never uttering a peep about how that country treats its women like shit)! And she's determined to win the presidency no matter how many lies she needs to tell. Which explains why she's gotten into a contest with Bernie Sanders regarding who can give away the most free stuff!

Because the bitch Hillary Clinton is a lying piece of shit lawyer who is about to be indicted, perhaps, just maybe, the Democrats need to look elsewhere for a candidate? Perhaps they can beg and plead with the studly Jim Webb to accept the nomination?

Yes, Miss Hillary claimed that Colin Powell also had a private email server when he was secretary of state and so she said "what's the big deal"? But this is utter bullshit. The fact of the matter is that NO previous Secretary of State has ever had a private email server running in their home from which they sent and received ALL of their correspondence while in office. The good news for her is that she (arguably) has plausible deniability as to whether or not she knew that the emails were classified. The bad news is the fact that if she asserts this as a defense she looks like a total incompetent and an utter moron.

Then there is also the fact that Hillary Clinton told her family and the President of Egypt that the Benghazi attack was an organized terrorist operation that had absolutely nothing to do with a video and then told the American citizens just the opposite. If that isn't proof-positive that the chick's a fucking liar then nothing is. And she also told this lie to the families of the four victims the same BS story, and that that the government was going to go after the fellow who made some Youtube video! Now she's implying that the families are aLL Lying (this Despite the Fact that the father of Ty Woods Has an in-time journal entry which substantiates his version of the story). SHAME!

But back to Hillary being evil. Do you think she made a deal with Satan to secure the Democrat nomination? I don't, given the fact that Satan is imaginary. But if he were real? Yeah, then I definitely think the shrill, shriveled up old hag would have sold her soul in order to become the leader of the free world. Fuck her!

Perhaps some day a woman might run for the White House who would make a good president. Maybe. Although, perhaps not, given the fact that A) chicks have babies and when raising those babies miss out on life experiences (which explains why any given man, by and large, will be more qualified), and B) women lie constantly (about things such as rape). Hillary herself has lied (and continues to lie) about the rapes committed by her husband.

My point is that the woman president we're waiting for is NOT HRC! Also, should we really have being a woman be one of the factors we use in selecting the leader of the free world? As opposed to choosing the person best qualified for the job (regardless of sex)? So that person will likely ALWAYS be a man. But that isn't sexist. Although the last time out the electorate chose a man, but they chose him just because he was Black! What's next pRogressives? Some transgender for president?

Byline: This outraged commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-241.

On The Fact That The White Race Is Superior

There exists no reason WHATSOEVER to believe that the primary ancestors of the Egyptian population emerged and evolved outside of northern Africa. Proof being the fact that dental samples have especially shown a biological constancy over the millennia. The Egyptian culture itself has essentially remained intact.

Yet there still remain these Afrocentric buffoons out there who are desperately trying to secure credit for the accomplishments of ancient Egypt? The sooner that black people relinquish these farcical and discredited myths (another ridiculous one is the assertion that sub-Saharan blacks came to America 40,000 years before the Native-Americans arrived via the Asian land-bridge) and accept the fact that the Africoon race is subpar, the sooner that they can get on to more important items; improving their human capital, strengthening the family structure, education reform, etc.

This they can do by rejecting the free goodies being offered by the Democrat Party and by voting Conservative. Preferably Libertarian. But voting Republican would be a step in the right direction. That direction being an escape from the Democrat plantation. Unfortunately I suspect most of them most of them lack the brainpower. I say this because science has proven that Blacks are less intelligent than Whites.

Sure, there are some ACTUAL black heroes (Jackie Robinson, Rosa Parks, Harriet Tubman, Frederick Douglass, Booker T. Washington, Ed Brooke, Thomas Sowell). Must be freaks of nature. That, or they got lucky (one of their ancestors was raped by a White man and they got enough White DNA to overcome the bad Black dummy genes).

But the dummy Blacks (most of them) are so insecure that they can't help but pedal (or buy) these stupid "we wuz kings" narratives. Pathetic. Also pathetic? The so-called Black Lives Matter movement. If Blacks weren't so violent (in addition to being dumb) cops wouldn't have to shoot them.

BTW, remember I mentioned improving their human capital is what they should focus on? If they did that they could get some halfway decent jobs working for White bosses for low (but steady) wages. As opposed to ending up in prison for dealing drugs (the males. Many of them named Mookie, Ray-Ray, Dre or Slice). Or subsiding on government handouts (which they get more of) based on how many kids they can pop out (the females).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-240.

On The Fact That Men Need To Step Up Their Game In Domestic Violence Situations

According to researchers such as Erin Pizzey and Warren Farrell, male victims of domestic abuse are more likely to get arrested themselves than they are to be helped by the system. The reason for this, obviously, is because the police can't believe that a man would be such a pussy as to be "abused" by a woman.

They either assume the man is the abuser, or they laugh their asses off when the man says his woman hit him and that he needs help. Obviously in such situations the man should beat the crap out of his woman. In order to teach her a lesson and make sure she never dares to raise her hand to her man again. These radical Marxist feminists need to learn that their place is in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant. Patriarchy, patriarchy, where for art thou, patriarchy?

On the other hand, the Department of Justice finds that women make up 84% of spouse abuse victims. The DOJ also found that 84% of spousal murder victims are female, and women in general are more likely to be killed by their spouses than all other types of assailants combined.

So the patriarchy isn't doing that bad. Still, that doesn't mean that men don't need to step up their game. Bitches need to know their place, and that these stats are not all 100% is obviously troubling.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-239.

Will Our Next President Be Gary Johnson?

So, here we are, actually on the verge of having to watch two of the most low-ball jamming and distrusted politicians in the country (Clinton and Trump) defecate on each other for the next five months in what is bound to be one of the most rancid presidential races in U.S. history?!

More and more I'm beginning to think that this existence thing of ours isn't actual but rather some virtual reality, hologram, dream, or video game. 'Cause I ask you here, what sane and cogent civilization would act like this? IT MAKES NO SENSE. Maybe we're participants in a game being played by the super-intelligent AI robots?

And, yes, I'm begging you, at least consider throwing away your vote on Gary Johnson, whose honesty, integrity, competence, sanity, and dedication to our beloved oligarchs we cannot question (at least not to this ludicrous level).

So, while I previously said that Johnson would probably have to kill somebody for me to not vote for him again, now I'm thinking that I'd vote for Johnson even if he out and out murdered someone. Heck, I'd still vote for Johnson even if we were to find out that he was a serial killer who pranced about in the nude wearing nothing but his victim's skin (in the privacy of his own home).

One thing I would not do, however, would be to write in the name "Les Carpenter" (AKA Lester Nation, the former proprietor of this blog). That guy is an asshole.

BTW, if Donald Trump were to be wise enough to select Gary Johnson as his VP, I'd vote for Donald in a heartbeat. Although I think Gary might say no if Donald asked him. However, IMO, Donald Trump might not be that bad. Also, at the end of Trump's 8 years in office Gary could run and win as POTUS (given the fact that a VP going on to become president isn't unprecedented).

On the other hand, the nation might just decide that neither Trump nor Clinton are fit for the presidency and decide to send Gary Johnson (a high-ball jammer) to the White House! Causing me (as well as others who worship the plutocrats) to jump for joy! Unfortunately, that seems unlikely, what with Miss Clinton going after the Bernie voters by offering to give away boatloads of other people's money. Not quite as much as Comrade Sanders wanted to give away, but still a LOT.

So, will Gary Johnson be our next president? Maybe not. A factor that might help Gary clinch the presidency could be the selection of the right person as his VP. Now, the former proprietor of this blog often suggested that he might be a good VP pick for Johnson. But given the fact that he went from being an anarcho-capitalist Libertarian who worshiped Ayn Rand and who thoroughly despised the Progressive Left to somebody who essentially signs off on every cockamamie Leftist notion under the damned sun? I'm thinking that I would be a MUCH better choice.

Surely Gary Johnson is smart enough to select Willis Hart as his VP. I mean, I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Gary reads this blog and takes pointers from it. And, a Johnson-Hart ticket would almost be a shoe-in, I think. Except for the fact that the voters are quite dumb. I mean, Bernie Sanders almost defeated Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination, and he's a Socialist for Christ!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-238.

Message To Bernie Sanders: I Hate Your Mother-Fucking Socialist Guts!

Does Bernie Sanders read this blog? I doubt it. If he does, however, I'd like to take this opportunity to let him know that I hate his mother-fucking Socialist guts with the intensity of the sun going supernova, expanding and engulfing our planet, burning the universe and vaporizing the earth!! (an explosion that would be roughly the equivalent of a few octillion nuclear warheads going off).

Frankly, I doubt I've ever felt this intensely regarding any human being who has ever lived. Which means that I hate Bernie more than I hate Abraham Lincoln, the most evil man who ever lived (right up there with Stalin and Mao).

The problem with Sanders isn't that he's evil (which he is) but that he's incredibly stupid. He's so stupid that he belongs in a group home for the mentally impaired. A place where the minders need to wipe the drool from the chins of the mouth-breathers.

My hatred for Sanders is also significantly stronger than any love I've ever felt for any human being as well. Although, as a Libertarian I can honestly say that there has never been anyone I've felt has earned my love, so that's a low bar that really isn't worth mentioning.

Yes, regarding Sanders I previously said "the American Eagle needs BOTH of its wings to fly", but I've changed my mind bigley on this. I still believe that the eagle needs two wings, but now I'm more convinced than ever that Sanders is simply too far Left. The dude is a fucking Socialist, for christ!

Now? I'm thinking that one of the eagle wings should be Right-wing and the other should be centrist. Honestly, I don't know what the fuck was going through my mind when I wrote that, given the fact that only the dumbest people on the plant subscribe to Socialist idiocy.

Which is why the idea of Bernie Sanders as president scares me shitless. Because he'd likely start rounding up the rich folks who voice (justified) anger regarding his massive tax hikes. And shoot a few of them in the head to make examples of them.

If I'm completely honest, I think that if Sanders were elected president, I'd seriously consider moving out of the country. Because Sanders (according to his own rhetoric) would do his damndest to utterly destroy our democratic republic. And for that, yes, I absolutely hate his fucking guts. The asshole should have defected to the USSR when he traveled there for his honeymoon!

Byline: This outraged commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-237.

I'm With Trump In His Desire To Restrict Raghead Access To Our Country

Did you know it's a fact that only 33% of Ragheads living in Britian would turn in a terrorist to authorities (Source)? Obviously the solution is to not to allow in hundreds of thousands more of 'em? Apparently (even Angela Merkel has conceded that multiculturalism has totally failed).

Keep 'em out, I say. As for Trump, he says we need to keep them out, but only until we can "figure out what's going on". But we know what's going on! Islam is backward and incompatible with the values of the West. I say we should not only ban more of them from entering the United States, but kick out many that are already here (67% maybe?).

Perhaps we should start rounding them up and putting them in camps (the ones who would NOT turn in a terrorist to the authorities). Although that's not going to happen under Obama. Hopefully, after Trump is elected and figures out what's going on (they hate us)... then we can start deporting them? Trump did say that his administration would look at that and many other things. One of the "many other things" SHOULD be deporting Muslims as far as I'm concerned.

Fucking dirty flea-infested raghead terrorists. And the ones who aren't terrorists are terrorist lovers! As the study I linked to shows. Make America great again by kicking them out. I mean, here in the US we're the champion of diversity, inclusion, and tolerance, except when it comes to Ragheads. Which is why it's a very bad idea to allow the mass immigration of folks from cultures in which these very concepts are totally abhorred.

This is "logic" that an average 8th grader would have been able to dismantle when I was a kid but which today is quite literally parlayed around ad nauseam by 35 year-old insular feminists as a form of spiritual and ethical enlightenment. Boy, has the West ever gotten stupid. And, by "West" I mean Progressives.

Those fuckers are determined to destroy America. I wish we could deport them. Comrade Bernie Sanders would be a good place to start, IMO. Send him back to the country where he honeymooned (the USSR). Why didn't he apply for asylum when he was there? As opposed to coming back here and attempting to make the US more like Soviet Russia.

So, even though I'm voting for Gary Johnson? Bring on the Trump presidency, I say.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-236.

76 Bitches Be Lying About Getting "Raped"

It's a fact that, according to feminists it doesn't matter how many times that a woman says, "yes, yes, more, more", tirelessly pursues her supposed abuser (substantiated by a "paper trail"), or even lies her ass off about the event, the "victim" must never be doubted or even questioned as consent can be withdrawn whenever a woman Wants, even AFTER a consensual act has taken place.

Specifically I'm referring to Canada feminists who've been critical of the Ghomeshi verdict. This was a case where Canadian radio host Jian Ghomeshi was (in late 2014) arrested and charged with four counts of sexual assault, and one count of overcoming resistance by choking, in relation to three complainants. Although 16 people actually accused him (including one man who said Ghomeshi grabbed his nuts).

Kinda reminds me of all the women who are lying about (my hero) Bill Cosby "raping" them. Bill Cosby is a successful Black man who realizes Blacks are to blame for their own poor predicaments and not "racism". Mr. Cosby tried to administer some tough love to the black community just a few years ago. They responded by calling him an Uncle Tom and senile. Yes Houston, we definitely have a problem.

The current Cosby problem is that 60 women have accused him of "rape". And, according to the feminist bitch lawyer Gloria Allred, "I can assure Mr. Cosby that there are still more victims who will be courageous enough to come forward in the future".

"Victims"? While it's easy for me to believe that 60 (maybe it's more by now) women could all be lying, I also have to confess here that when that legendary publicity-monger, Janice Dickinson (maybe the ugliest and stupidest supermodel ever), jumped into the fray and claimed that she, too, was raped by Mr. Cosby, a LOT of doubt creeped in. Now, I'm thinking this could definitely be a bum's rush. And yes, I said "possibly" before, but cases like Ghomeshi (16 lying accusers) caused me to rethink my previous comments.

BTW, that "paper trail" consists of one "complainant who had previously testified to having no contact with Ghomeshi after the alleged assaults [but who was then] confronted with two emails she had written to Ghomeshi more than a year afterwards, one included a picture of her in bikini [which] she described... as bait to get him to explain why he attacked her". Sure.

There is, however, the fact that Ghomeshi's own employer [CBC] investigated and issued a report that stated he "consistently breached the behavioural standard... of CBC by yelling at, belittling and humiliating others [and engaged in] "sexualized conduct and comments... in the workplace". But the "investigation was led by Janice Rubin, a prominent lawyer and leading authority on workplace harassment". So, another lying bitch, in other words?

Now Cosby is apparently going to trial? I sure hope he catches a break (like Ghomeshi) and the witnesses against him screw up and the charges are thrown out. Because bitches ganging up to attack innocent men has become an epidemic, IMO. Hopefully the patriarchy will display a backbone for once and put a screaming halt to this bullshit (and, yes, by bullshit I'm referring to hard-core indoctrination in which radical Marxist feminist orthodoxy is the unquestioned cynosure).

Men need to lay down the law because women's demands (to not be raped) are really getting out of hand, IMO. Fucking lying sluts.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of defending rapers who are falsely accused. LLIN-235.

President Jimmy Carter Did The Right Thing And Lowered Taxes On Rich Makers (Unfortunately The Post-Presidency Carter Is A Piece Of Shit)

Did you know that Jimmy Carter signed into law (after initially opposing it) the the Steiger Amendment; a piece of legislation that reduced the top capital gains tax rate by nearly 44% (from over 49% to 28%)? Yeah, I'll commend Carter for coming around and realizing that greedily seizing the wealth of the Makers WHO EARNED IT (in order to redistribute it to worthless takers al la Comrade Sanders) wasn't the way to go. More evidence that Carter was a moderate to conservative Democrat.

Carter's views were much more in sync with JFK and Al Smith than they were progressive buffoons such as FDR, McGovern, Sanders, etc. And, yes, I've ultimately concluded that Carter was an underrated President (the fact that the guy cut taxes, deregulated various sectors of the economy, brokered a peace between Egypt and Israel, appointed Paul Volcker as Fed Chairman, kept spending relatively low, worked well with the Republicans, etc.) whose failure was at least to some degree the function of dumb luck. Plus he was an honest fellow. Gotta give him some cred for that as well.

Why this defense of Carter, when the Rightwing bashes him TO THIS DAY (with comparisons to Barack Obama)? It's because the Libertarian Mises Institute said I should "rethink Carter". I used to refer to myself as a "small L libertarian", but that's no longer the case. Now I eagerly scarf down any and all Libertarian bullshit I can get my hands on. If a Libertarian author, thinker, fellow, think tank or institute said it, I believe it unquestioningly.

But back to Carter... unfortunately this douche-bag's antics post presidency make me want to retract that cred. I mean, did you hear he said America is an oligarchy? That would be my biggest criticism of him. I mean, if America were an oligarchy that would be, IMO, fucking awesome. Then we could get to eliminating the welfare state. Instead of growing it like both Hillary and Bernie are promising (although Hillary may be lying. Or I hope she is, at least).

Although she's going to be indicted soon, which will almost certainly cause her to lose to Donald Trump. And yeah, I might have been able to get behind Trump, except for him saying he's going to "renegotiate" our trade deals. Because they result in American workers getting screwed. Which is why I say fuck him. Screwing American workers to further enrich the oligarchs is what Adam Smith advocated for.

Although Trump might be lying about that too. He surely is a hypocrite on the matter, what with all his "Trump" products being manufactured outside the US. Although (don't get me wrong), as (if he is a hypocrite on this matter) I applaud him for his hypocrisy.

Carter also insulted the Tea Party movement. According to POTUS #39 Tea Party patriots are "racist". Then Carter said "I think there has been a degeneration in this country in absolute equality for black and white people"... which is complete horse shit. Especially considering most of the racism that remains is Blacks thinking White men are the Devil.

And, get this... Carter said he's "saddened by the events in Ferguson MO". And he wasn't referring to all the violent Africoon animals looting and torching businesses (all based on the "hands up, don't shoot" lie). So, yeah, the post-presidency Carter really makes me want to puke. What a piece of shit he degenerated into. Similar to the recent degeneration of the Democrat party. Shameful.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of devouring Libertarian bullshit. LLIN-234.

On The Fact The Evolution Is Phony Baloney

The odds of a chimpanzee randomly typing out the word "evolution"? For the sake of simplicity, let's leave out the numbers and punctuation marks. Even after that, the odds are still astronomical; 26 to the 9th power to 1, or 5,429,571,278,976 to 1. And yet this is in essence what the advocates of evolution are asking us to believe, MULTIPLIED BY INFINITY.

Look, I'm not saying that the Bible-thumping creationists are correct, either (with many of them in fact being certifiable), just that maybe we still don't know, that's all. Personally, I think life on earth was created in a lab by super-intelligent AI robots, who then seeded the galaxy. But, hey, I could be wrong.

Anyway, Bible-thumpers are usually Conservative, as I am. So at least they're right on that front. I'm talking about the belief that, if you're a Maker, you should be able to keep 100 percent of YOUR money. By which I mean taxes should be zero. Because they're evil. I mean, the Christian Bible says "thou shalt not steal from the Makers", right? Or some variation. Something "God" and the AI robots that created us are SURELY in agreement on.

That thievery from the Makers is a sin. Stealing from poor people, however? It doesn't count. Because what we're really talking about is exploiting. And a rich man exploiting a poor man to further enrich himself is just the way the world works. Because it's the way it's SUPPOSED to work. Read Ayn Rand if you don't believe me. Social justice warriors are worse than Nazis. And are going to end up in "hell" for their sins (if such a place exists).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-233.