Monday, September 8, 2014

On the Constipated Mathematician

He worked it out with a pencil.

He stuck the pencil up his anus in order to dislodge the feces that would not budge, in other words. I'm guessing he used the eraser end, as sticking yourself with the sharpened end could be quite painful. And then he threw the pencil away. Or perhaps he washed it off. Either way, it isn't important to the joke. Although I'm thinking he placed the fouled pencil in with the pencils of a rival mathematician. That would be an even funner joke.

Byline: This hilarious commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of straw men, as well as hilarious jokes. LLIN-130.

7 comments:

  1. When has a liberal ever used facts in their agenda?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Obama, thinks that he is so much better than anyone else that's why he has a 70% disapproval rating from the people in this country

    Obama might DREAM of being like Reagan. but there is no way in hell that he could even come close to that dream...... Reagan won with 49 of the 50 states something the Dear Leader Obama dream of doing. Reagan was very popular and admired President. Obama is admired by takers, rioters, illegal’s, and of course thugs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sounds like the kind of joke the fecal-obsessed banned individual with the cesspool of a blog might like. Although it might go right over his head.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree dmarks in regards to wd's SWTD cesspool. Dude has totally lost it. Certifiable, there is now longer even a sliver of a doubt In wd's case.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I see that you've been allowing wd to publish comments here, Les. The better course of action - one that I recommend - is to place a cutout in front of your screen and delete whenever you see that idiot's name. But you might not be as chicken as I am when it comes to comments that scare you... as I am when it comes to wd. Anyway, I must say that my echo chamber has benefited from banning wd and his virulent idiocy (and by "virulent idiocy" I mean facts I can't deal with).

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm with Will in regards to banning the person who might obsess over a dead horse. But it's your blog and your rules, Les. You can, however, count me as being in favor of banning him here, same as you did on RNUSA. wd only subtracts rather than adds to the conversation. Especially if he's on about Noam Chomsky's nude behind or some other homoerotic topic.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.