Many moons ago, back in 2010, I maintained my pledge to generally keep the debate of religious theocratic philosophy, with all the sordid details with respect to human suffering that are part of it's history, off the pages of this websight, out of site of my readers. As you may have noticed, that stopped. This reason is that I simply could no longer contain my hatred for the smelly flea and lice infested mUslins.
This occurred when construction of a Mosque near Ground Zero was proposed. The rush by the pRogressives to argue in support of its construction lead me to delve into the issue, and provide a reality check for those in favor of any such construction. Just to set the record straight, because the pRogressives who read this will otherwise undoubtedly call me a right wing Bible thumping fanatic, I am a believe that religion, or the lack thereof is a deeply personal issue. If there is one issue I agree with the pRogressives on it likely would be the issue of religion and its place in society. But in regards to my hatred for the smelly flea and lice infested mUslins, I digress.
The attack on the United States of America on September 11, 2001 was an attack by iSlamic religious extremists that are determined to destroy not only the USA, but any civil society that does not accept the religion of iSlam. While there are probably dozens, if not hundreds of moderate Muslims who can live in peace with their non Islamic neighbor, the very structure of the iSlamic religion, the Koran is anything but peaceful. To the devout adherents of iSlam a mosque at this place represents a breath taking victory of the west and its infidels.
The argument that Islam is a religion of peace is a myth carried not only by moderate Imams and Mullahs, and by pRogressives in America that have latched onto the "feel good" aura it provides them. It is likely few of them are aware of the history of Muhammad the creator of iSlam, or the requirements of the devout adherents to the faith of Muhammad.
The Koran says that non mUslins must convert or be killed, which is why Lying Lester argues that we must kill them first. And, in regards to that, Lying Lester proposes we start by bombing the Ground Zero mosque, which could be accomplished easily by sending some of our military jets to drop a few targeted missiles.
Now, for those of you who think this sounds extreme, I should point out that iSlam builds mosques on "conquered territory" as symbols of "victory" and "conquest" and iSlamic mosques are symbols of domination and centers of radicalization. And the fight over the not-yet-completed mosque is not just about religious tolerance, it is about recognizing the truth and the danger inherent in the supposed peaceful religion of iSlam and the evil symbolized by the false prophet Muhammad (piss be upon him).