On Third-World Child Labor Being Uber-Cool As It Enriches The Plutocrats More Than If They Have To Underpay Third World Adults

What these progressives have to realize is that a) the alternative is not an all-expense-paid education at the Masters School in upscale Simsbury Connecticut where kids get private tutors, are ferried to and from school in limousines and eat caviar and foie gras for lunch every day, and b) what these youngsters would ultimately be doing if they weren't working in a factory would be stealing, hustling, fighting, scavenging, prostituting, going to school and learning skills that might result in a better job in adulthood, etc.

So, yeah, the next time that you want to boycott child labor, think about the plutocrats and how child labor enriches them even more than underpaying third world adults and having them work in dangerous and soul-sucking conditions that, if the machinery doesn't suck them in and result in a death/missing limb, or the building doesn't collapse on them... they commit suicide by leaping to their deaths.

Better to exploit children and suck out their souls so they don't grow up with any false hopes of getting good jobs and not ending up working in dangerous conditions where, if the machinery doesn't suck them in and result in a death/missing limb, or the building doesn't collapse on them... they commit suicide by leaping to their deaths.

Yes, child labor is "bad", but really not that bad, as I do think that SOME work is good for kids in that it teaches them responsibility, work-related skills, that life is hard and they will need to toil for 12+ hours a day for exceedingly low pay for the rest of their miserable lives for the benefit of the plutocrats.

Also remember that the harsh reality is that ALL societies go through these same evolutionary patterns and for us to try and meddle in it is pure arrogance and an all but guaranteed foray into making the matter worse, in that protecting these kids from exploitation will harm the plutocrats that we all love and wish to see grow even richer.

Byline: This surface thinking free commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Advocator of child labor. LLIN-182.

Egghead Nation

I've heard that Bernie Sanders wants to bail out folks who've racked up tens of thousands of dollars in student loan debt acquiring a college degree. When will these socialist eggheads finally realize that investing in our intellectual infrastructure yields high dividends, in that people who graduate from college go on to higher paying jobs, and thus pay a lot more in taxes over their lifetime. I've heard that for every dollar invested, the government gets back seven dollars.

Sounds like a great deal, right? Think again. Does this country need more ivory tower liberal eggheads running around making the rest of us feel inferior? Seriously, what we need are more uneducated working class joes. Why? Because an oversupply of low wage labor will drive the cost of said labor even lower! Which is what the plutocrats want.

Think about it. While I admit I'm a big advocate of job-killing free trade, another option would be to drive down wages for working class folks to what they pay in 3rd world hellholes. Then, instead of shipping our jobs overseas, the plutocrats could pay Americans extremely low wages. And not have to ship the manufactured goods back here to the US. If you want your jobs back, American workers, I say you need to work for a lot less.

Yet we've got Democrat socialists like Bernie Sanders wanting to pay workers a living wage of $15 bucks an hour? Why not $500 an hour I say. Seriously, why is nobody is suggesting this? Perhaps because it's a total strawman? I mean, if increasing the minimum wage to any ridiculously high amount has no discernible negative effect on employment, why be so skinflint? Let's go for it.

On the other hand, if we want to bring jobs back to America, we could stop educating our kids all together. Bring in the docs and lawyers from foreign countries and let American born workers fight for incredibly crappy and extremely low paying jobs. Then the plutocrats won't be forced to go overseas to hire desperate people willing to work for pennies a day.

Because American workers will be desperate enough to work for pennies a day. And America will become a 3rd world hellhole. While the plutocrats retreat to their gated communities protected by hired security. I don't know about you, but it sounds like a decent plan to me.

Frankly I think it's past time we stop subsidizing college tuitions, as doing so only makes matters worse, in that it only enhances our intellectual infrastructure and pays the taxpayer back seven-fold. Good at first blush, but it takes away individuals from the low-wage pool, thus costing business owners more in higher wages. Would it not be better to leave college for the kids of rich people? And, yes, it's a rhetorical question.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of strawmen. LLIN-181.

On Intelligent Design Proponent, Stephen Meyer

He is intelligent, polite, interesting, and thought provoking and, while he ultimately may be proven incorrect in the long run, the abuse that he and other advocates of intelligent design have received is disgusting and an embarrassment to the scientific community.

Even though it won't matter when he's proven wrong, as we will no longer exist... after being placed in the ground and rotting away. Or that is what I believe most likely happens after we die. There is no "soul" that is whisked away to some imaginary "heaven" or "hell".

Any any case, I also find it ironic in that that a lot of these same detractors constantly go around proclaiming that THEY are the "rational" ones while at the same time aiming personal attacks at Meyer, calling him a bald-faced liar/a quack, undermining his credentials, misrepresenting him/his work (straw-manning him, on other words), ridiculing his religious beliefs, etc.. I mean, why not they just say that they disagree with the Intelligent Design hypothesis that Meyer espouses and list the reasons why? Boom, done.

I swear, folks, some of these cocksucking scientist fuckers aren't any better than the angry religious fundamentalists.

As for me, like I said, I think that after we die that's likely it. We go into the ground and rot away. Although, as I noted previously on this blog, Darwin's theory of evolution simply does not hold up to scientific scrutiny. So how do we explain our existence? Where did we come from?

Might it be possible that these proponents of Intelligent Design aren't that far off? My own theory is that, instead of the "intelligent designer" being some mythical "god", that we were actually designed by otherworldly super intelligent AI robots. Black people, obviously, contain some kind of design flaw, in that they are so much more violent than White people, for christ!

So, what do you think me-buck? Is there any chance at all that my theory is correct?

Byline: This intelligently designed commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of pointing out that evolution is phony. LLIN-180.

On the Fact that Most Mutations Tend to Be of a Deleterious Nature

This is probably the largest obstacle for the neo-Darwinians to avoid; the fact that random mutations are the central mechanism (far more important than natural selection, from my viewpoint) for evolution to be viable and that there would literally have to be tens of thousands of them operating in a beneficial manner for a cross-species event to materialize, etc...

The only logical conclusion, given the fact that evolution is a bogus theory, is that our ancestors came here from somewhere else. I'm thinking colonization from another planet. I mean, given that I'm an atheist, I surely do not believe we were intelligently designed for christ!

By a imaginary "god" that is. The designers were likely otherworldly super intelligent AI robots. Just don't ask me who designed the robots, fucking neo-Darwinians!

Byline: This intelligently designed commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of pointing out that evolution is phony. LLIN-179.

On Being So Contemptuous of Another Human Being as to Absolve Them of All Moral Responsibility & Judgement Pertaining to Their Actions & Choices

This is the hard-left's form of bigotry and it is every bit as loathsome and insidious as that which emanates from myself. Sorry, but, yes.

Although, now that I think of it, why the hell would someone absolve another person of all moral responsibility and judgement pertaining to their actions and choices if they were contemptuous of them? This statement makes absolutely no sense.

However, you must keep in mind that is how I, Willis V. Hart, rolls... by which I mean much of the Libertarian nonsense I espouse makes absolutely no sense.

Byline: This nonsensical commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of nonsense. LLIN-178.

On The Fact That "Willis Hart's LLIN" Is A Fact-Based Blog Chock Full Of Facts. Too Many Facts For Progressives To Take, In Fact

Yes, it is a fact that this blog is entirely fact-based, as opposed to opinion-based. Yes, I share my opinions, but my opinions based on the FACTS. This is why Progressives hate this blog so much. It's because of the overwhelming number of facts that Progressives find inconvenient to their emotion-based fact-free arguments.

This applies to my other blog too, by the way. Contra O'Reilly is also a 100 percent fact-based blog where I share my fact-based opinions. Sorry if that chafes your hides, Progressives. Sorry, but sorry.

Byline: This fact-filled commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of fact-based blogging and NOT being sorry. LLIN-177.

On The Fact That You Continuously Go to Blogs That You Do Not Like And Attempt To Use A Multiplicity of Strange Handles Just So that You Can Have Somebody to Debate

Frankly I think you need help and a lot of it. It aint working as I am not debating you... so why don't you just give up? And yes, I'm talking to YOU!

Truth be told, I find your loserness extremely offensive. Now go away. Paper-hat-job-holding Mom's basement dwellers such as yourself are not welcome here.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of being perpetually offended. LLIN-176.

On Your State of Being Perpetually Offended

Admit it... you're offended by what I write on this blog. Frankly I think you should cut it out. I mean, if I were you (God forbid) I would probably take some of that energy and apply it toward improving my own human capital. Life is way, WAY too short, you idiot.

On the other hand, you're an idiot and likely lack the brainpower to better yourself. Obviously being offended is all you are capable of. So, forget what I just said and continue to be offended.

By the way, in case you're confused as to who I'm referring to... I'm referring to YOU. You're the one who is perpetually offended. And my blog is the reason why you take the easier route of raging and trolling instead of attempting to solve personal problems you can actually affect.

It's gotta be tiring, though, no?

Byline: This offensive commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of offending you. LLIN-175.