Gun Rights Are For Whites

While I don't own a gun myself, I am a BIG supporter of gun rights. With one caveat. Gun rights should be for Whites (and possibly Asians) only. Black people should not own guns. I reached this conclusion, btw, after listening to that asshole Obama's speech at the funeral for those 5 murdered Dallas police officers.

A speech during which he simultaneously stated that a) police violence against young Blacks isn't isolated but systemic and b) the vast majority of cops are good, honest, and hard-working. Yeah, he's trying to thread the needle here (unsuccessfully, I would say))))).

What kind of an person would give yet another boneheaded and divisive speech on race (drawing a moral equivalence between the cold-blooded murder of those five cops in Dallas with the death of those two black guys whose small brains at least partially contributed with their demise) AND DO IT AT A FUCKING FUNERAL? I mean, I don't know about you but that totally creeped me out.

Proof Blacks should NOT own guns!! Either they use them to commit crimes, or carry them and get themselves shot when pulled over or otherwise confronted by the police (and they have a gun either on their person or in their car). Why? Because the cops SHOULD always assume that a Black with a gun intends to use it to kill them (Blacks being inherently criminal and violent).

This is why Blacks should absolutely NOT own guns! Not that we could pass a law prohibiting this (Constitutional reasons). But Blacks with guns - even if they have them legally and for self protection only - should expect to be shot if the cops catch them with one. Sorry, but yes.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-292.

The Police Should Be Able To Kill As Many Blacks As They Want

In fact, being that the black murder rate is fully 6 times that of whites (17.5 per 100,000 versus 2.6 per 100,000) with the perpetrators being 93% other black people, I'm actually quite insulted that Black Lives Matter makes an issue of cops killing Black people.

Why this bullshit is being placed not just at my doorstep but the law enforcement community's, I can't comprehend. STOP BLOWING YOUR FUCKING BRAINS OUT. Much of it over foolishness; half-eaten Snickers bars, Air Jordan sneaks, some big-butted heifer, a slight, etc!

Until then BLM should shut the hell up. Blacks are killing each other, so why the hell shouldn't cops be able to kill them? Justified or unjustified, who gives a fuck? In either case I say... blast away. Because Black lives do NOT matter. This according to the Black community for Christ!

BTW, don't believe me that darkies are killing each other over half-eaten Snickers bars, Air Jordan sneaks, some big-butted heifer or slight? Tough. I'm going to keep saying it and NEVER provide any evidence that any darkie has been killed by another darkie for such a reason. I must have read it somewhere. You don't know how to use Google?

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-291.

On The Odds of a White Person Being Able To Have An "Honest Conversation" About Race with Obama, Holder, Or Any Leftist Minstrel

Yeah, probably about the same as Bridget Bishop, Rebecca Nurse, and Giles Corey had when those folks tried to have an honest conversation about witchcraft with the douche-bag magistrates in Salem circa 1692. Zero, in other words.

Blacks won't honestly discuss race because they're all racists. Except for the Conservative Blacks. Obviously they aren't racist.

Clearly they must have bigger brains than your average darkie. Probably a result of one of their ancestors being raped by a White guy. Or somehow otherwise being cross-bred. Because, as we all know, Blacks are genetically less intelligent than Whites. But also much more prone to violence and criminality.

And THAT is why Obama, Holder, etc will NEVER honestly discuss race. They won't admit that most Africoons are violent and dumb. Even though Obama was born to a White woman, and therefore is more intelligent. Meaning he KNOWS what he's doing is dishonest.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-290.

Violent Black Cops Shooting Violent Black Criminals!

Did you know that it's a fact that (according to University of Pennsylvania Sociologist, Greg Ridgeway) a Black police officer is 3.3 times more likely to fire his weapon at a crime scene than a White, Asian, or Hispanic officer?

No, of course you did not! Because the Liberal media won't report this. The PDF is available on the internet, BTW, so go find it yourself if you don't believe me.

And, gee, I wonder who a virtual shitload of those victims might be. Any ideas, folks? Yeah, that's right... it's other violent Blacks! Time to purge the PO of all Black officers? If you want to appease the Black Lives Matter racists, this might be something to consider.

Because it isn't the White cops who are shooting all the Black suspects, only a small portion of them. These latest shootings being anecdotes. Anecdotes that the Liberal media and racist BLM folks point to, in a futile effort to make it LOOK like White racist cops are the problem. Which they aren't. As usual it's the inherently criminal and violent Blacks!

The Left's response is that something called "institutional racism" is to blame... to which I say "yeah, right"! Sarcastically, btw. Because like with "white privilege", "male privilege" and "patriarchy", "institutional racism" is just another made-up term for something that does not exist.

Made up by self-hating Whites and their minstrel allies (minstrels = Black liberals who have a media platform). Made up so they can shift blame for criminality to White conservatives. When WE ALL KNOW Blacks are inherently violent and criminal. Most likely due to their smaller brains.

Which is a scientific fact!! I point this out in case any Lefty trolls attempt to call me racist for stating scientific facts. Sorry, but no.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of racism. LLIN-289.

On The Fact That Former Fox News Anchor, Gretchen Carlson, Is Now Accusing Her Former Boss, Roger Ailes, of Sexually Harassing Her On The Job

Yeah, I strongly suspect that this story won't be leading off the Kelly File, Hannity or duh Factor any time soon. The other networks - that's a different story!!

Me, I think the biotch should have just slept with him. I mean, the primary reason Fox hires the skirts is as eye candy, and for that reason Carlson should have been grateful for her job. And to her boss, who approved her high salary. Was he that out of line to expect a little sugar in return? I say no.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of misogyny. LLIN-288.

On The Fact That Somebody Got To FBI Director James Comey

That someone got to him is the only thing that explains why he let Corrupt Hillary off the hook. What I'm wondering now was if it was a bribe or a threat? Maybe HRC promised he could keep his job in her administration? Or perhaps she (or Obama) threatened to kill his family if he didn't reach the right conclusion?

I don't know. Perhaps further investigations by the Republican Congress will uncover the truth? I won't hold my breath... but if somehow how they did? Surely that would throw the election to Donald Trump.

I mean, everything that Comey said in his presentation pointed straight to a recommendation to indict (the fact that dozens of these messages were considered classified AT THE TIME, the fact that her server wasn't even as secure as Gmail, his admission that other people would have been penalized for these transgressions, etc). And then, kaboom, nothing!!!

It's outrageous! If there were a march to protest the fact that HRC hasn't been indicted... I'd support it. That bitch belongs behind bars. No matter that there was a much worse email scandal under the Bush administration (one that involved the destruction of 22 million emails in order to cover up election thievery directed by AG Gonzales).

But Bush hasn't been president for 8 years!! Everyone knows that if you commit political crimes and get away with them... you're in the clear and nobody should never talk about them again. And everyone also knows this only applies to Republicans. Sorry, but yes.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-287.

On the Claim that Killing One Bad Man In Yemen (Often Along with 25 Innocent Ones) Via Remote Control Constitutes Self-Defense

Sounds more like cold-blooded murder to me but, hey, what do I care? We're only talking about some backward savages, after all. Some might say the less of these people in the world the better.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-286.

On The Fact That All Climate Scientists Who Say AGW Is Real Are Corrupt & On The Take

No, I don't have any proof that I'm going to present. But, think about it... scientists don't like to travel coach any more than the rest of us do and so OF COURSE these two-bit whores are going to tell the government what it wants to hear - namely, that the world is going to end and that homo sapiens are the cause.

Yeah, there surely is a lot more money on the other side... Big Oil shelling out loads of cash to cover up the truth. But scientists on that side of the debate are incorruptible. At least they wouldn't sell out for first class plane tickets, no way.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of climate change denialism. LLIN-285.

If You're White Know That Black People Want You Dead

In regards to the paradigm of "Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, and Europe/North America for everybody"... It does seem a little anti-white (not to mention, hypocrisy-ladened), does it not?

Not that I want to go to Africa, mind you. I mean, given the fact that a black person is 25 times more likely to violently attack a White person than the other way around they're probably chomping at the bit for White people to murder over there. Not that they aren't murdering each other all the time. But a White guy? They'd probably end up fighting each other regarding who gets to murder me. If I was foolish enough to visit there, that is.

Which I am not, btw. What I'm saying is that violent Black animals aren't welcome in White neighborhoods for good reason. If you're a darkie prowling for a White victim, I say STAY THE HELL OUT! Because If I see you... I'll call the cops and they'll beat your ass. At a minimum. Perhaps they'll see that you're reaching for your gun and shoot you dead!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-284.

On Slant-Headed British Millennials Who Are Trying to Equate Britain's Leaving the European Union with Fascism

So, giving more and more power to some distant and corrupt central authority ISN'T fascism but self determination is? Man oh man is this current generation ever dumb.

Oh, and what the hell is wrong with wanting to keep Muslims out of your country? Sure, if you can import harmless hardworking brown people to do manual labor jobs for low pay... that's great. But importing brown people who will leach off the natives (via the welfare state) or (worse yet) commit terroristic acts? Sorry, but no.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-283.

Koran = Evil

When the U.S Confederation government (circa 1786) sent Thomas Jefferson and John Adams to Tripoli to negotiate an end to the Barbary Pirates' illegal raiding of U.S. vessels, Tripoli ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahamas told the two U.S. Diplomats that "It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and the duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise".

Yep, and it's good to see that they've made such progress in the last 230 years. Douche-bag ragheads. To bad that when Thomas Jefferson became President (and refused to pay tribute, instead sending a United States Naval fleet to the Mediterranean where they bombarded the various fortified pirate cities, ultimately extracting concessions of fair passage from their rulers), he didn't instead wipe them out.

Or continue bombardment until maximum casualties were inflicted, at least. Today I'm thinking we should just nuke em. Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, etc. Ann Coulter said we should nuke them, and perhaps there's something to that idea. I mean, as a Libertarian I'm opposed to war, but you simply can NOT reason with these savages. So we might not have any choice but to annihilate them.

And, if we simply dropped a bunch of nukes it would be over and done with fairly quickly (no protracted war, costing the US blood and treasure). Sure, that would be genocide (and some peaceful ragheads might be killed), but who really gives a shit about the lives of backward barbarians? Not me, that's for sure.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of Islamophobia. LLIN-282.

Seriously, I'd Like To Beat The Crap Out Of Chris Hayes, Re His Stoogish & Pitiful Attempt To Defend The Repugnant Mrs. Clinton (What A Piece Of Shit She Is!)

I actually watched Chris Hayes for several minutes interview some equally partisan and obnoxious buffoon from Media Matters the other night but promptly had to turn the channel when these two pseudo-intellectual douchebags started spinning faster than Ann Miller and Janet Leigh in "Two Tickets to Broadway" in what was obviously a pitiful attempt to defend the repugnant Mrs. Clinton in regards to... ???

I don't actually recall what they were defending her on. Probably regarding her criminal actions relating to having a private email server (sending classified information). Or it might have been in regards to her criminal actions regarding Benghazi (lying to families about the attack being linked to some idiotic video).

All I know is that I changed the channel very quickly. Which is something I do quite a bit... tune into MSNBC and then change the channel promptly. Usually no more than 20 to 30 times a day. The rest of the time I spend watching the hotties on Fox News. Yeah, I'd be able to stomach MSNBC for longer periods of time if they put some hot women on it. Hot lesbians would be awesome... but NOT Rachel Maddow for sure!

Anyway, do these people (and, yes, I would put Hannity in this class, too) simply not realize how idiotic and transparent that they look? I mean, I understand that they're aiming at a specific audience and all but I would tell 'em straight up that if their goal is to persuade the undecided, this 1970s pro wrestling good versus evil silliness ain't gonna do it. It's not.

Hot lesbians smooching... that would do it.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-281.