I Am A Proud Racist

By "racist" I mean someone who recognizes the FACT that Whites are superior and that other races are inferior. And not only inferior, but criminally inclined and violent. Take a look at South Africa, for example. There White Farmers are being murdered by the violent jigaboos on an unprecedented scale.

Is this seriously what we want for the United States? A multicultural hell? I know I surely do not. This is why I support our excellent president's plan to greatly reduce the flow of immigrants from shithole nations. Yeah, when Trump called these countries "shitholes" the liberal media cried foul. But Trump told the truth. These countries (the ones inhabited by low-IQ violent jigs) ARE shitholes!

For this reason people say Trump is a "racist". But I am exactly the same sort of "racist". A person who thinks America should remain a majority White nation. Now, I am no "White Separatist", but if we could reverse course I'd be all for that. I refer to the demographic trend some refer to as the "browning of America".

That is why I am 100% behind our president and his desire for more immigration from White nations. There needs to be enough Whites to keep the violent jigs in their place. If, Ayn Rand forbid, this country ever becomes majority minority, we will be fucked. Just like in South Africa, where the murder rate of White farmers is through the roof, the jigs here will get a lot more violent. Mark my words! They can't help it because it is their nature.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of racism. LLIN-314.

I, Willis Hart, Am Totally Full Of Sh!t (I Say This As A Compliment To Myself, btw)

Regarding Donald Trump and the homos? Well, he does want to keep people out of the country who overwhelmingly think that gay folks should be put to death. Gotta give him credit for that at least.

According to the Ragheads "Homosexuality is one of the most disgusting sins and greatest crimes... It is a vile perversion that goes against sound nature, and is one of the most corrupting and hideous sins... The punishment for homosexuality is death. Both the active and passive participants are to be killed whether or not they have previously had sexual intercourse in the context of a legal marriage... Some of the companions of the Prophet stated that [the perpetrator] is to be burned with fire. It has also been said that he should be stoned, or thrown from a high place".

Above quotes from the Saudi Ministry of Education Textbooks for Islamic Studies: 2007-2008 Academic Year Center for Religious Freedom of Hudson Institute.

And, as we know, THIS is the guy who speaks for all the mussies. BTW, that Mike Pence is strongly anti-gay? Who the fuck cares? It isn't if the Republican platform this year isn't the most anti-gay platform in the party's history. Oh, wait, it is?

And Pence also voted for the Iraq war and is in favor of the TPP. Conclusion? That Donald picked this guy (who opposes much of what Donald is running on), is definitive proof that Donald Trump is bullshitting us. Which I like. I mean, if I didn't I wouldn't continually give him props when the guy is clearly totally full of shit, right?

Which, btw, is also a good thing. I say this as a blogger who is totally full of shit most of the time myself. And what's wrong with being full of shit?

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-299.

Proof The Leftist Media Is Out To Get Trump

Did you know that Bill Clinton has received over $16 million in compensation for being the honorary chancellor of a diploma mill that has repeatedly been sued for fraud (something called laureate Education) - this while at the same time said enterprise's parent company has received $55 million dollars in grants from a Hillary Clinton led State Department? (source).

Likely not. Apparently our Leftist media doesn't consider it newsworthy. But isn't this just as bad (and maybe worse) as Trump University? Please? I know I'm praying that it is. Because if both DJT and HRC are charged and found guilty... can you say President Gary Johnson? Unlikely, sure. But when you reside on the farthest fringes ideologically (like I do), far fetched scenarios SOMEHOW placing your fringe candidate in office are all one has to cling to.

Don't get me, wrong - I hate HRC considerably more than DJT (he who has "offended" the Liberal media via a cadre of impolitic statements). Which is why I'd only vote for HRC if someone held a gun to my head. Sure, I wouldn't vote for DJT either, but that the Liberal media keeps attacking him (while ignoring Clinton transgressions) makes me so mad!

I mean, so the fuck what if Donald flat out ripped off people via his so-called "university"? I call it pigeon plucking, and have no problem at all if stupid people voluntarily decide to hand over their money. I mean, it's their fault if they don't do their homework. And, as a Libertarian, I am 100 percent in favor of education provided by the private sector on a for-profit basis (and do not believe these for-$ educators need any stinking regulation).

As for this applying to Laureate Education as well as Trump U... the answer is yes. But I'm going the hypocrite route on here and saying the Clintons should be hammered on this, while Donald should be given a pass. Even though, according to Jonathan Turley "there is no evidence of a quid pro quo arrangement or even direct grants" re Laureate's parent company receiving $55 million in grants from the HRC led State Department.

So, while the Clinton education "scandal" may be more unsavory as opposed to criminal, while Trump's fake "university" absolutely looks like a case of outright fraud, I'm still thinking the Clintons should be prosecuted and the Trump case dropped.

Does that Mexican judge have it in for Trump? I doubt it's because he's Mexican. But he clearly is prejudiced against savvy businessmen like Trump who are good at raking in the profits. And there's also the fact that Gonzalo Curiel was installed as a judge on the United States District Court for the Southern District of California after being nominated by... President Barack Obama!

This would be the same Obama who was the subject of allegations of not being US-born by Donald Trump. Which indicates that Trump being persecuted here might be a case of payback. I mean, since I'm already spinning unsubstantiated (Clinton-only) conspiracies, what's one more?

By the way, I noted near the beginning of my commentary that Laureate has been "repeatedly" been sued for fraud. Turley says this happened once, and the case was dismissed. Repeatedly or once, I say Laureate (and by association, the Clintons) are guilty as hell and should go to prison. Or at least not end up in the White House. Sorry, but no.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-270.

On Donald Trump Saying We Need To Renegotiate Our Trade Deals

Is Donald Trump's economic illiteracy so profound that he's unaware of the fact that immigration doesn't just move the supply curve (pertaining to labor) but the demand curve, too? This is why wages are only pushed down substantially, but NOT pushed down (for the most part) dramatically.

I guess that they didn't offer Libertarian Econ 101 at the Wharton School during his tenure there (that or he took a regular Econ class). Yet another reason I'll be voting for Gary Johnson again. Because Gary understands that opening the borders will bring prosperity for all (all the people in the 0.1 percent, that is).

Gary Johnson: My vision of the border with Mexico is that a truck from the United States going into Mexico and a truck coming from Mexico into the United States will pass each other at the border going 60 miles an hour. Yes, we should have open borders. (Gary Johnson on Immigration).

This, to me, sounds like a VERY good idea. Because 42% of Mexico's total population lives below the national poverty line, while in the United States, only 13.2% of Americans are living in poverty.

Gary Johnson KNOWS the US can do better! By "better" I mean we can do a better job of transferring wealth from the lower classes up to the higher/better classes. Opening up the border would help the US move toward greater wealth disparity.

Although "recent census data shows that half the population qualifies as poor or low income" in the United States, so we're not doing that bad. But Donald Trump says we need to "renegotiate" our trade deals. Apparently so that some of those manufacturing jobs that were sent to China can come back here?

Yeah, that's something I say "no way" to. Because driving down American's incomes by outsourcing labor to low wage countries is a BIG part of the oligarch's plan to destroy the middle class. And, this is a strategy that's been in place for quite awhile, with both Republican and Democratic presidents and administrations working to further it.

Opening the border, on the other hand, is generally opposed by both parties. The Republicans being more fervert on this issue, however. Which is why Donald Trump proposed building a wall.

I mean, if we'd be fortunate enough to get Gary Johnson into the White House in 2017, perhaps we could move toward opening the borders (the "we" being those of us, like myself, who worship the oligarchs). But since that's probably not likely, continuing "free trade" seems the best course of action (to continue transitioning the US to neo feudalism).

But with Donald Trump as the Republican nominee? All I can say is WOW. This is surely NOT a good development. Hopefully HRC (is she is our next president) will flip-flop on the TPP (again).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-269.

As Plainly as I Can Say It... I'm A Gary Johnson Dupe

This commentary concerns my vote for president this November. Will I vote for Trump? I thought long and hard about it, but in the end I decided that Trump is a clown and I refuse to vote for clowns. If he wasn't a former reality show personality? Then, MAYBE I'd vote for him.

I really like his idea about building a wall. Not to keep out Hispanics willing to work for incredibly low wages. I'm 100 percent in favor of opening the borders to let in slave wage laborers (driving down wages for average Americans). But we do need to keep out terrorists who might try and sneak over the border (perhaps with a suitcase nuke).

So, that's a NO on Trump (unfortunately).

But you know who else I refuse to vote for? I refuse to vote for a person who lies to the families of the victims of the Benghazi attacks (telling them one thing when you told your own family something different) and who, when pressed on the matter, strongly implies that they're the ones who are lying.

Regardless of whether or not that actually happened. Which it did not. According to David Brooks (a man I admire because he's one of the very few commentators out there who holds both sides' feet to the fire) the search for something (anything) to indict Hillary on (in regards to Benghazi) failed because there was no scandal. In Brook's words the endless "investigation" of HRC over Benghazi resulted in NOTHING to slime Hillary with because it was a "big nothing burger".

David Brooks further said "there is a certain psychosis that goes through people's minds, especially about scandals, but Clinton scandals, where they — where something smells, and they think there must be something big, and they imagine there is about to be some big revelation that will destroy their careers".

Yeah, I think that just about sums it up for me. The psychosis that results in thinking there MUST be something big. That "something" being the "fact" that HRC "lied" to some of the families of those who lost loved ones in Benghazi. See also Lara Logan's debunked reporting regarding what Dylan Davies (a British employee of the security company Blue Mountain Group) said happened on the night of the Benghazi attacks.

According to Davies (as per his incident report) he "could not get anywhere near" the compound the night of the attack. Later he changed his story. In the revised version he "scaled a wall of the compound, personally struck a terrorist in the face with his rifle butt, and later went to the Benghazi hospital to see Ambassador Chris Stevens' body". Presumably he made himself a hero in this version in order to sell a book (a book that Simon & Schuster pulled when it discovered Davis was a liar).

Regardless of whether or not Davis is a liar (which he is), I continue to stick to my guns and insist that Lara Logan's reporting (reporting which she apologized for, saying "we made a mistake") PROVES that that IT'S NOT a "fake scandal" After All!!! And, yeah, I strongly suspect that Ms. Logan is going to get slimed over this one. Just because she said she made a mistake in putting a liar on the air?

Does it really matter that Davis lied? I say NO. What's important is the story that Logan initially reported. A story that makes the Obama administration and HRC look bad. Sorry, but I've got to part ways with the estimable David Brooks on this one. In this instance I think he took his penchant for holding people's feet to the fire regardless of party TO FAR. I mean, in this instance I think harming HRC's presidential chances is what is important. As opposed to getting the facts right.

For the record, when I said before that I'd vote for Hillary if someone held a gun to my head and told me I had to chose between her and Donald... and I said I'd vote for Hillary? What I forgot to add was (in that scenario), it was Hillary who was holding the gun to my head. If nobody was holding a gun to my head - and the choice was Hillary or Donald? I'd choose Donald. Despite him being a clown. And least he isn't a liar like Hillary (even though what I SAY she lied about is something she actually didn't lie about).

That's who and why I'm voting for Gary Johnson again. I'm totally in with his use of the buzzwords "liberty" and "freedom". Because he's referring to freedom and liberty for rich people. Mostly freedom from high taxes. Nevermind the fact that, belying the "liberty" facade, Gary has surrounded himself with a bevy of Rightwing opperatives.

Gary Johnson's campaign chief, Ron Nielson... runs a conservative polling firm called NSON Opinion Strategies, whose headquarters is the same three-story building on South Temple Road as Johnson's campaign headquarters... NSOM has a history of working with GOP right-wingers including crotchety Mormon asshole Orin Hatch and ex-witch and masturbation-denier Christine O'Donnell... Gary Johnson's campaign headquarters is located in Romney's backyard, in a right-wing Republican polling firm's office. [Also] according to documents filed with the state of Utah, the person responsible for filing the paperwork to register Gary Johnson's "Our America Initiative" is Maureen Otis, a Texas attorney with deep roots in the far-right Minutemen movement, and with Republican Party voter-suppression dirty tricks. (The Gary Johnson Swindle by Mark Ames. 11/6/2012).

The article goes on, but you get the idea. Gary Johnson being a "Libertarian" is (as per the article title) a swindle. Gary, despite his claims of wanting "liberty", associates himself with Rightwing operatives who are involved in voter suppression. Suppression that benefits Republican candidates.

Keep in mind that Gary (running as a Libertarian) has ZERO chance becoming president. So what's the game here? Help yourself by helping those who are cheating to get Republicans elected? Yeah, I think that's it.

Which I should note is A-OK by me. Will GOP dirty tricks help Donald Trump get elected? I think it's definitely possible that Republican voter suppression could hand the presidency to Gary Johnson Donald Trump. Sure, I'd be ecstatic if (somehow) voter suppression benefited Gary Johnson. Unfortunately that's not going to happen.

That being the case, I'm OK with Trump getting "elected" president. I'm not in love with the idea, but it is what it is. Better him than a piece of shit like HRC. Although (like I said) I'm voting for Johnson. Unless Hillary held a gun to my head. Then I'd vote for her. I'm only one vote and surely my one vote is NOT worth dying over. At least it isn't worth ME dying over. If Hillary held a gun to wd's head and said "vote for me or else" (I'll blow wd's head off)? I'd tell her to pull the trigger.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-256.

Will Our Next President Be Gary Johnson?

So, here we are, actually on the verge of having to watch two of the most low-ball jamming and distrusted politicians in the country (Clinton and Trump) defecate on each other for the next five months in what is bound to be one of the most rancid presidential races in U.S. history?!

More and more I'm beginning to think that this existence thing of ours isn't actual but rather some virtual reality, hologram, dream, or video game. 'Cause I ask you here, what sane and cogent civilization would act like this? IT MAKES NO SENSE. Maybe we're participants in a game being played by the super-intelligent AI robots?

And, yes, I'm begging you, at least consider throwing away your vote on Gary Johnson, whose honesty, integrity, competence, sanity, and dedication to our beloved oligarchs we cannot question (at least not to this ludicrous level).

So, while I previously said that Johnson would probably have to kill somebody for me to not vote for him again, now I'm thinking that I'd vote for Johnson even if he out and out murdered someone. Heck, I'd still vote for Johnson even if we were to find out that he was a serial killer who pranced about in the nude wearing nothing but his victim's skin (in the privacy of his own home).

One thing I would not do, however, would be to write in the name "Les Carpenter" (AKA Lester Nation, the former proprietor of this blog). That guy is an asshole.

BTW, if Donald Trump were to be wise enough to select Gary Johnson as his VP, I'd vote for Donald in a heartbeat. Although I think Gary might say no if Donald asked him. However, IMO, Donald Trump might not be that bad. Also, at the end of Trump's 8 years in office Gary could run and win as POTUS (given the fact that a VP going on to become president isn't unprecedented).

On the other hand, the nation might just decide that neither Trump nor Clinton are fit for the presidency and decide to send Gary Johnson (a high-ball jammer) to the White House! Causing me (as well as others who worship the plutocrats) to jump for joy! Unfortunately, that seems unlikely, what with Miss Clinton going after the Bernie voters by offering to give away boatloads of other people's money. Not quite as much as Comrade Sanders wanted to give away, but still a LOT.

So, will Gary Johnson be our next president? Maybe not. A factor that might help Gary clinch the presidency could be the selection of the right person as his VP. Now, the former proprietor of this blog often suggested that he might be a good VP pick for Johnson. But given the fact that he went from being an anarcho-capitalist Libertarian who worshiped Ayn Rand and who thoroughly despised the Progressive Left to somebody who essentially signs off on every cockamamie Leftist notion under the damned sun? I'm thinking that I would be a MUCH better choice.

Surely Gary Johnson is smart enough to select Willis Hart as his VP. I mean, I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Gary reads this blog and takes pointers from it. And, a Johnson-Hart ticket would almost be a shoe-in, I think. Except for the fact that the voters are quite dumb. I mean, Bernie Sanders almost defeated Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination, and he's a Socialist for Christ!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-238.

I'm With Trump In His Desire To Restrict Raghead Access To Our Country

Did you know it's a fact that only 33% of Ragheads living in Britian would turn in a terrorist to authorities (Source)? Obviously the solution is to not to allow in hundreds of thousands more of 'em? Apparently (even Angela Merkel has conceded that multiculturalism has totally failed).

Keep 'em out, I say. As for Trump, he says we need to keep them out, but only until we can "figure out what's going on". But we know what's going on! Islam is backward and incompatible with the values of the West. I say we should not only ban more of them from entering the United States, but kick out many that are already here (67% maybe?).

Perhaps we should start rounding them up and putting them in camps (the ones who would NOT turn in a terrorist to the authorities). Although that's not going to happen under Obama. Hopefully, after Trump is elected and figures out what's going on (they hate us)... then we can start deporting them? Trump did say that his administration would look at that and many other things. One of the "many other things" SHOULD be deporting Muslims as far as I'm concerned.

Fucking dirty flea-infested raghead terrorists. And the ones who aren't terrorists are terrorist lovers! As the study I linked to shows. Make America great again by kicking them out. I mean, here in the US we're the champion of diversity, inclusion, and tolerance, except when it comes to Ragheads. Which is why it's a very bad idea to allow the mass immigration of folks from cultures in which these very concepts are totally abhorred.

This is "logic" that an average 8th grader would have been able to dismantle when I was a kid but which today is quite literally parlayed around ad nauseam by 35 year-old insular feminists as a form of spiritual and ethical enlightenment. Boy, has the West ever gotten stupid. And, by "West" I mean Progressives.

Those fuckers are determined to destroy America. I wish we could deport them. Comrade Bernie Sanders would be a good place to start, IMO. Send him back to the country where he honeymooned (the USSR). Why didn't he apply for asylum when he was there? As opposed to coming back here and attempting to make the US more like Soviet Russia.

So, even though I'm voting for Gary Johnson? Bring on the Trump presidency, I say.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-236.

On Why I Can't Vote For Donald (Although He May Be Our Next President, Which Wouldn't Be So Bad IMO)

Yes, I considered voting for Mr. Trump, but (ultimately) I decided to stick to my original plan of throwing my vote away by casting my ballot for the Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson. You know, the dude who receives less than 1 percent of the popular vote every single time he's run previously (and zippo electoral votes). Meaning he has absolutely no chance of being elected president.

As for me not voting for Donald, there are two main reasons. A) He's a protectionist/nativist who's obviously never read a single page of Bastiat (mustn't have been on the reading-list at Wharton) and B) the fellow doesn't have the temperament to spearhead the world's largest military or to even be a respectable actor on the world's stage (and in a world that's already filled to the brim with clowns like Merkel, Cameron, Netanyahu, Putin, etc., that's saying quite a bit).

Although he is smart enough to suggest that we should be letting Putin take the lead in Syria. When your enemies are slaughtering each other, I say let them. Not that Mrs. Clinton's all that appreciably better, mind you, but, yeah, if you held a gun to my head, I probably have to pick her. For the comedy factor, I'm saying. Because she's going to be arrested shortly, then tried, convicted and sent to prison. For having her own/private email server and sending classified info via that system.

Although, if the Democratic primary voters select someone (before the voting in November) who is convicted of felonies... well, it should be a cakewalk for the Republican nominee to secure the presidency in such a situation. So we might very well end up with a president Donald J. Trump. And, if you held a gun to my head a 2nd time? I might say that sending Donald to the White House wouldn't be that terrible an outcome.

Byline: This insightful commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-227.

On The Fact That Willis Hart Is Smart And You Are Dumb

The average voter in America being dumber than a box of rocks (all too willing to accept the whole "free lunch" narrative), it's not a high bar. So, given that fact, I, Willis Hart am a genius in comparison. Also not in comparison, but in reality as well. Being a Libertarian, and given the fact that Libertarians are an insignificant voting block, clearly I'm in the 1% of the smartest individuals on the plant (or less, given that Gary Johnson received less than 1% of the vote).

Which brings me to an individual longtime readers of this blog will surely be familiar with, a man who used to blog here under the moniker "Lying Lester" (AKA Les Carpenter of RNUSA). A man who used to identify as an anarcho-captitalist (a batshit crazy Libertarian offshoot, followers of which believe in subjagation for the poors. Or death if they refuse to submit).

Les Carpenter also worshiped the great philosopher Ayn Rand (she who rightly identified greedy poors as parasites) and thoroughly despised the Progressive Left. And, it was for these reasons I USED to have great respect for him. Because we were so very strongly in agreement, as I believe in all these things as well... I'm batshit crazy, hate poors and progressives (I'd have added that I also worship Rand, but that would be redundant, as all worshippers of Rand are batshit crazy).

But now Les has degenerated into somebody who essentially signs off on every cockamamie Leftist notion under the damned sun - from demonizing fossil fuels to playing the race card to demagoguing on income inequality, class warfare, etc. Which makes me wonder what the fuck happened? He's getting up there in years, so perhaps it's senility? Perhaps he fell and hit his head and is suffering from brain damage? (Or, perhaps it's that the hit to the head reversed some pre-existing brain damage?)

Whatever the explanation, this is exponentially far from normal behavior and, yes, when you throw in the whole Jersey McJones alter-ego, it's damned near psychotic. Now he agrees with that asshole Bernie Sanders that government confiscation on a frightening scale is exactly what the US needs?!

Me? I know it won't make America great again. And yeah, that's a nod to Donald Trump. A candidate who might not be so bad, but that's only compared to the others (who are all terrible beyond comprehension). Which is why I'm voting for Gary Johnson, the only man who can save America. Although Trump might not do too much damage as potus.

Which is why I'm hoping that if our next president isn't Gary Johnson (the candidate the electorate is too dumb to vote for) then it's Donald Trump. Although it SHOULD be Johnson. But, like I said, the electorate is way too dumb to elect him.

Les Carpenter SAYS he's voting for Johnson, but he also bashes Donald Trump non-stop on his blog, which seriously disappoints me. And has written positive things about that fucker Comrade Sanders, as well as slammed me for pointing out how violent Black people are (in agreement with the hard-core racial demagogue, Octopus). Fuck both of them!

Image: A simple depiction of why I support anarcho-capitalism, a system under which worthless scumbag poors are forced to submit to their wealthy superiors... or die.

Byline: This hyper-intelligent commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts and proud worshipper of our wealthy overlords. LLIN-223.

Bernie Sanders Is An Insane Lunatic Who Will Destroy Our Republic If Elected!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Firstly, the number of exclamation points I used in the title of post? They are TOTALLY warranted! The reason? Lately I've been thinking that Mrs. Clinton HAS to know that Bernie Sanders is monumentally full of shit and a total lunatic but because the Democratic primary voters are just as outside the mainstream as those on the Republican side she's afraid to bitch-slap him and has even tried to match his Leftist pandering at times!!

I mean, we all know that Hillary Clinton is actually a Moderate to Conservative Democrat and Comrade Sanders is a fucking Socialist, who if elected president, could destroy our Republic! This is exactly why democracies have a penchant to devour themselves (the fact that people when given the choice will almost always vote for those who promise them the most while making others pay for it) and why the Founding Fathers created a Republic instead.

Hopefully we still have enough checks and balances to ward off a total collectivist coup and right out fiscal ship. 'Cause if we don't, watch out. You can be sure that a president Sanders will try his damndest to make our beloved wealthy Makers pay "their fair share". What a fucking asshole. This drooling maniac should be straight-jacketed and locked up in a mental institution. Instead he's running for president? Unbelievable!

Yeah, that's why I'm 100 percent convinced that Donald Trump might not be that bad of a president. Although I'll be voting for Gary Johnson I realize he has no chance of actually getting elected. So Trump getting in might be the best we can hope for. Especially if Bernie Sanders clinches the nomination, Ayn Rand forbid!

Even if it's getting less and less likely... and more and more likely that Hillary will be the nominee (unless she's indicted, convicted, and sent up the river). Yeah, I really think that's a distinct possibility. And then what? A Trump versus Sanders race. Which means that Sanders could actually win! Hopefully we still have enough checks and balances to ward off a total collectivist coup and right out fiscal ship. 'Cause if we don't, watch out.

I might move to Hong Kong.

Byline: This insightful commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-216.

On Our Possible Future President Donald Trump Being Maligned By The Leftist Media

Specifically I'm referring to a recent Yahoo hit-piece that compares Donald Trump to George Wallace, but there are many other examples of unfair treatment from the Leftist media of Mr. Trump. A fact that makes me SO MAD! Which is why I predict that if I patiently wait to see a comparable piece comparing Hillary to Nixon or Sanders to Ho Chi Minh, I'd be waiting forever.

So, yeah, I reject the brain diseased idea that Trump has an "advantage" due to the "free media exposure". Not when all the "free exposure" is negative in nature. More likely it is hurting his campaign rather than helping it. This just goes to show how popular Trump is with the voters... and how likely it is that he will be our next president, I think. Which wouldn't be so terrible, IMO. Sure, I'm for Gary Johnson, but a president Trump? There is no way it could be worse than a Sanders or Clinton presidency. At least, as a Republican, Trump is a fiscal conservative and not a Commie (and I think the facts show that Trump might be more fiscally conservative than your average Republican).

P.S. And what exactly has Trump done to or said about black people that is comparable to George Wallace? I mean, yeah, he said that dumb thing about illegal immigrants and wants a pause on Muslim immigration but a) he never denigrated Mexicans as a whole, only that the illegal ones are rapers, and b) based on that Pew research study (which showed that a majority of citizens of Muslim countries hold views which are 180 degrees diametrical to ours) and the fact that even many of Obama's own security people have warned us of a possible terrorist infiltration of the migrant population, his Muslim pause may not be anywhere near as insane as its being made out to be...

And it's certainly a boatload less draconian than what FDR, that progressive darling, did to the Japanese. Even if Trump pushes for that registry of Muslims he proposed (Trump said he would certainly implement that — absolutely, in reference to a law requiring Muslims in the United States to register in a database). What would be the big deal if that happened? I mean, most of the terrorism comes from the Muslim community, so I think that maybe we should have a registry.

The bottom line here is that Trump is reasonable and pragmatic and the Leftist media referring to him as racist is a vicious smear. And, quite frankly, all these lies about Mr. Trump really make my blood boil! And, that there are large numbers of partisans ON BOTH SIDES that don't want Trump elected? It makes me think that it's possible that Trump might make a very good president.

Byline: This insightful and non-biased commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart, purveyor of defending Donald Trump (our likely 45th president). LLIN-214.

Cruz and Rubio Should Stop Repeatedly Blasting Trump for Not Releasing His Tax Forms!

It's outrageous because Trump is being audited and no reputable tax attorney would ever recommend that a person being audited release his or her records to the public. Also, it is true that Cruz and Rubio have both released their 1040 forms, neither has released their Schedule C form and that is clearly what has the juicier info.

I mean, you do want the total picture here, right - and preferably from someone who doesn't have a dog in the fight, like me, Willis Hart? I mean, I'm for Gary Johnson (even though his chances are zero). But you can absolutely trust my objectivity on this.

Sure, if I wasn't voting for Gary Johnson I might vote for Trump and I hate both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders with the heat of a thousand white-hot suns, but otherwise I'm the most objective dude on the plant.

Anyway, as you recall Mitt Romney followed the precedent set by John McCain by releasing two years of tax returns. Although McCain, the 2008 GOP nominee, bucked the trend of other recent presidential candidates. In more than three decades, no other nominees for either party have released fewer than five years' worth of returns, and Romney's own father released a dozen years’ worth when he ran for the GOP nomination in 1968 (source).

But now maybe Trump is setting a new precedent, in that he'll release zero years of tax returns? I hope so, because a man's tax returns are really nobody else's business. My respect for Mr. Trump would go up by a notch or two if he stood up to this precedent of tax return releasing. If only he'd refudiate eminent domain, I might actually consider voting for him.

Byline: This objective commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart, purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-213.

Liberal Regressive Buffoons Can't Stop Bashing Donald Trump (And They Refuse To Point Out How Awesome Gary Johnson Is)

Leftist Jew buffoon Carl Bernstein recently referred to Donald Trump as a "Neo Fascist". Yeah. I just wish that these partisan media hacks would show at least a semblance of consistency. Like, I don't know, maybe also pointing out that Senator Sheldon Whitehouse apparently wants to prosecute global warming skeptics, that a large percentage of public colleges and universities are essentially outlawing freedom of speech, that conservative speakers are routinely shouted down at numerous campuses throughout the country.

That Senator Sanders (another Jew) has literally zero regard for the non-aggression principle and wants to hold a gun to our head and confiscate private property. Frankly it sickens me that so many of these Leftist fascists want to fuck rich Makers up the ass (figuratively) so they can give away more free stuff!

OUTRAGEOUS! Also outrageous? President Obama has used executive orders to make and change laws and to do so in a blatantly political way. And, for the record, it was wrong when Bush did it too. Clearly the Liberal media has no concept of fair. But would that be too much to ask? I mean, why the hell aren't they pointing out how awesome Gary Johnson is? Because they're either Liberal buffoons or Neo-Cons (emphasis on the "con").

However, truth be told, Fox (even though it gives Neo-Cons a platform) is not as bad as MSNBC. Sure, they're both biased, no question about it. But over the past several years, Fox has added Ed Henry, John Roberts, Howie Kurtz, and Maria Bartiromo (hell, they've even added Dennis Kucinich and the ragin' Cajun, James Carville).

Compare that to MSNBC which has done little more than plop additional leftist guttersnipes to its already full-to-the-brim posse of skin-crawlers/stooges. It isn't even a contest at this point, folks. MSNBC is significantly worse.

And MSNBC practically bashes Trump 24-7. That's when they're not airing "Lock Up" reruns. Pathetic. How about some air time for the awesome Gary Johnson, for Christ? This is the man who should be our next president, IMO. Not Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton! But the American electorate is as stupid as a Dunkin Donuts employee who apparently has an inability to process the phrase, "lightly toasted" (yeah, one of those motherfuckers messed up my order). I suppose that Bernie wants to pay these folks $15 an hour, too!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-208.

It Makes Me So Mad When Lefties (Including Supporters Of That Piece Of Shit Hillary Clinton) Refer To Sarah Palin As "Excrement"!

A while ago there was a debate between me and this small contingent of progressives that wasn't about whether Sarah Palin is qualified to be President (she isn't)... It was about how low people apparently have to go to feel superior. These jackasses (led by a Lefty calling him/herself "Lesley Parsley") kept referring to Mrs. Palin as a "classless piece of excrement" and "worthless piece of excrement". As well as a "media whore", "trailer trash", "classless piece of excrement" and "trashy wench"!

Look, folks, I'm sure that there are conservative blogs out there that are equally vile toward the President... But, as of now, I haven't seen a single one (because I haven't looked). Frankly, I find this kind of behavior OUTRAGEOUS! I mean, it is clearly the Lefties who have no class when they sink so low as to attack Mrs. Palin, not on the issues, but with pure ad hominem!

Yeah, and most of these HYPOCRITES are supporters of that PIECE OF SHIT Hillary Clinton! That's the bitch who might end up indicted as well as the Democratic presidential nominee! But, instead of focusing on the problems in their own party, these Democrat fuckers (the ones that used to go after Sarah Palin) are now going after Donald Trump! It really makes my blood boil!

Look, I'm not a big Trump supporter but I, unlike your average partisan stooge blogger whose entire existence is one mindless and gratuitous anti-Trump post after another, am willing to give credit where credit is due. And Trump might be our next president, so I say he deserves some respect. Like Sarah Palin (who was a governor). She deserves respect as well.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-207.

On Why I Might Vote Donald Trump For President

Steve Hayes recently referred to the Trump candidacy as a "Clown Show", to which I say "maybe". But do I need to remind you that Mr. Hayes currently scrimmages with the "Weekly Standard", a neocon rag that gives both cover and credence to some of the most buffoonish and despicable war-mongers inside the beltway (William Kristol, Fred Barnes, Charles Krauthammer, etc.)?

Yes, Trump has his flaws - NO QUESTION. But at least he doesn't have blood rupturing from his typewriter, for Christ. And, at least he's not a Bible thumper like all of the other Republican hopefuls (to some degree). Or a liar like Hillary (who said Benghazi was the result of some YouTube video when she knew it was a terrorist attack). Or a fucking socialist cocksucker (for christ!) like Bernie Sanders.

I mean, if I knew my vote for Gary Johnson would make the difference between Trump winning or losing my state? Yeah, then I think I might just pull the lever for Trump, god help me. Say what you want about Vladimir Putin, but at least the fellow has a coherent plan when it comes to Syria. And Trump is smart enough to let him take the lead there. When your enemies are slaughtering each other, I say let them.

And I must also give Trump props for his bitch slapping of that loathsome freakazoid Rosie O'Donnell. You know, I used to start fights between kindergarteners when I was a 6th grader (a 12 year-old Don King) and, so, yeah, I can kind of relate.

Anyway, while it's doubtful that I'd vote for Trump... I just might. Aside from Rand Paul, Trump is the only Republican candidate who doesn't appear hell-bent on a second cold war. Also, if the choice was Trump or Sanders, you can bet your ass I'd vote Trump given the fact that he acknowledges the fact that American workers are overpaid (and that we need to do away with the minimum wage).

Have you heard that the world's richest 62 people have as much wealth as the other half of world's population? Yeah, it's good news that inequality has become that great. So, question is... do we want to go backwards by electing a Socialist like Sanders? Or even a conservative Democrat like Hillary (who's also running on handing out free stuff)? Hell no!

Byline: This hate-filled commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of hate blogging. LLIN-197.