Lying Lester Discusses Blundering Obama's Big Blunder

On Sunday, leaders representing Europe, Israel, Africa, Russia, and the Middle East linked arms and marched together down Place de la Concorde in Paris. Unfortunately and most conspicuously our own pResident chose not to attend.

The decision by the pResident of the United States of America to not be present, or at the very least send his Vie President, has been most troubling. Obama may have had his reasons but in politics and governance perception can be everything.

Certainly the perceptions of many, if not most on this important issue is not a positive one. The White House belatedly recognizing the error in judgment has acknowledged the mistake while at the same time spinning to put the best face possible on the snafu.

On this issue LLIN finds itself behind Senator Ted Cruz. At issue is the growth of, and the threat radicalized extremist Islam present the civilized world.

President Obama should have been there. Our president ought to have known this instinctively. It is of course now water under the bridge. Mistakes happen. This one never should have.

But, back to Senator Cruz, a potential 2016 presidential candidate who wrote the following in a TIME magazine op-ed...

Ted Cruz: The absence is symbolic of the lack of American leadership on the world stage, and it is dangerous. ... Many of our allies gathered together in Paris yesterday in an admirable display of determination. Our President should have been there (Link).

Dangerous! Dangerous that the feckless leading-from-behind Obama was not in attendance. That is Cruz's opinion, and the opinion of Lying Lester as well. Perhaps oBama did not attend due to his being a stereotypical lazy Black man?

But in regards to the danger... the danger is that the sub human terrorist killers see weakness in oBama's actions. Or even agreement with their goals. Given the fact that some believe oBama may be a sleeper mUslim terrorist who ran to bring down America from within. Not that Lying Lester agrees with this assessment. Although, as Senator Cruz points out "the failure of Obama to lead the free world in this way encourages radical Islamic terrorists" (source).

So, while oBama may not be a mUslim himself (or at least a radical one), he ENCOURAGES the radical Islamic terrorists (though his action... or inaction). Gee, Lying Lester has to wonder if bArack hUssein oBama has a flea or two? He might, if he's too lazy to take a shower.

Byline: This insightful commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of untruth. LLIN-156.

Not All mUslims Are Sub Human Animals. Just Almost All Of Them

Lying Lester knows first had up close and lersonal that all Muslims are not sub human animals. Only MOST of them are. The ones that are flea and lice infested. And extremist.

By "extremist", I mean those mUslims who consider muhammad to be a prophet. mUslims that do not consider muhammad to be a prophet are A-OK in Lying Lester's book, and are NOT sub human animals. mUslims such as my (imaginary) mUslim friends. These (imaginary) friends consider themselves mUslims but agree with Lying Lester that, instead of saying "peace be upon him", we should be saying "piss be upon him" when referring to muhammad.

As for these 21st century Islamic extremists who follow muhammad, their acts of barbarity continue to grow throughout the world. So, what's it ti be? Tolerance and understanding for the religion if "peace" or condemnation followed by swift and decisive justice? It seems impossible to have it both ways with these sub human animals.

But should we try? Lying Lester says NO! Lying Lester says we should slaughter them all! The right of free speech critical of government and religion absolutely must be advocated, supported, and if necessary fought for by all who desire to be free to experience the joy of liberty.

Having said this it does seem that intentionally provocative and negative press presumably for the sole purpose of goading a particular group may not be all that sensible. Especially given the particular in question long track record of violent response. Just a thought.

A thought Lying Lester rejects. Moving to the governments of the free world; they must be collaborating, planning, plotting, and ultimately setting in motions concrete actions that will help the Muslim nations of the world neutralize or eradicate the threat radicalized extreme Islam presents to the world.

The sooner these mUslim nations reject muhammad the better. And start bathing regularly as well. If they did this (reject muhammad and bathe), then Lying Lester would agree to spare they should be spared from the slaughter.

It's going to be a long treacherous road and there is no guarantee reason and rational thought concerning rejecting muhammad and bathing will ultimately win. One thing is certain though; if the West allows itself to be driven by the actions of these extremists into becoming like them they will have won.

What I mean by us becoming like them is our not abandoning our religion. The United States is primarily a cHristian nation, although atheists such as myself have been increasing in number. The Pew Research Center says "the number of people who identify themselves as atheists in the United States has been rising, modestly but steadily, in recent years [and] data from 2012 show that 2.4% of American adults say they are atheists when asked about their religious identity, up from 1.6% in 2007".

So the trend is in the right direction, but still... only 2.4 percent of Americans are rational enough to not worship an imaginary sky god?! But I digress... what I was talking about was the sub humanness of mUslim extremists. The most recent example being the attack on the staff of the satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo.

The magazine published some cartoons making fun of muhammad (piss be upon him). Well, if these mUslims took Lying Lester's advice and recognized that muhammad was a horrible person who should not be acknowledged as a prophet... well, then there would be no problem.

That problem being the fact that muhammad (piss be upon him), was a sub human animal, very much like the perpetrators of the Charlie Hebdo attack. Those who pay reverence to a sub human "prophet" does not say much for the adherents of Islam, in my opinion.

Lying Lester's advice to sane mUslims around the world is to cast muhammad aside. Like my (imaginary) mUslim friends have. Remember that Lying Lesters knows first had up close and lersonal that this is the only way to avoid being a sub human animal.

Byline: This excellent commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of BS concerning Muslims who reject the prophethood of muhammad. LLIN-155.

Lying Lester Appreciates the Fact That George W Bush Kept Us Safe. Admit It Leftists!

George W. Bush and Dick Cheney versus the lazy bArack oBama and the irrational Joe Biden. Who kept us safe? GWB brought democracy to Iraq and oBama allowed ISIS to rise by withdrawing our troops. That is simply a fact. However, I am sure the left emotionalisms will be rushing to let us know how correct oBama was to CUT AND RUN and the apologist lefties on this critical issue of national security will surely given our current "commander in chief" a pass.

Here's my op ed take on this issue.

Simply put the facts speak for themselves. Prior President GWB, irrespective of what the lefties would have us believe, kept us safe from outside terrorist attacts on our nations soil.

The Bush administrations focus on national security was effective and should be appreciated by all. Americans. The lefties see it differently because they have a socialist Leninist Axe ti grind. Be not fooled by their BS and emotionalism.

Lying Lester urges you to examine the facts and make your own independent decision as to who is most correct on this issue. Our national, and hence individual security depends on on which side of reason the American public comes down on.

If you decide correctly you'll agree with Lying Lester that going into Iraq was the right thing to do. Yes, I've said otherwise on my other blog (rAtional nAtion uSA) and elsewhere in the blogsphere. But Lying Lester was lying. I have always supported bush's invasion of Iraq. Because it kept us safe.

Which is why I strongly urge you to move away from partisan politics and dogma. Your children's and grandchildren's future may depend on your decisions today. And, by the way, this message goes out to one of my heroes as well. Mr. Gary Johnson, who is opposed to us waging war.

But the dirty, filty, flea and lice infested mUslims have given us no choice. We have no choice but to fight them. And to KILL them. And torture them. The rise of ISIS in Iraq makes that crystal clear. So clear, Gary Johnson might change his mind? Lying Lester certainly hopes so.

Lying Lester thinks rational rEpublicans, rational dEmocrats and rational Libertarians can unite on this issue and do what needs to be done to keep us safe. Which would be to continue to fight the war on terror the dirty, filthy flea and lice infested mUslims began when they attacked us on 9-11.

George W. Bush and Dick Cheney realized the fight would be long. and the fight would be hard. and that the MIC would grow and grow (and our oligarchs would prosper). oBama and Biden FAIL in this regard. Under oBama we are much less safe.

Perhaps Lying Lester should vote for Mittens Romney should he run again in 2016? Surely that would be better than to see another week-on-national-defense dEmocrat in the White House for another 4 years!

Byline: This excellent and non-hypocritical commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-137.

LLIN Observes A Moment Of Silence To Honor Those The Smelly Flea & Lice Infested Muslims Murdered In Name of Their False Prophet

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Byline: This reverent commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of hate for mUslims and the false prophet mOhamed (piss be upon him). LLIN-133.

Lying Lester Proposes Bombing The Ground Zero Mosque

Many moons ago, back in 2010, I maintained my pledge to generally keep the debate of religious theocratic philosophy, with all the sordid details with respect to human suffering that are part of it's history, off the pages of this websight, out of site of my readers. As you may have noticed, that stopped. This reason is that I simply could no longer contain my hatred for the smelly flea and lice infested mUslins.

This occurred when construction of a Mosque near Ground Zero was proposed. The rush by the pRogressives to argue in support of its construction lead me to delve into the issue, and provide a reality check for those in favor of any such construction. Just to set the record straight, because the pRogressives who read this will otherwise undoubtedly call me a right wing Bible thumping fanatic, I am a believe that religion, or the lack thereof is a deeply personal issue. If there is one issue I agree with the pRogressives on it likely would be the issue of religion and its place in society. But in regards to my hatred for the smelly flea and lice infested mUslins, I digress.

The attack on the United States of America on September 11, 2001 was an attack by iSlamic religious extremists that are determined to destroy not only the USA, but any civil society that does not accept the religion of iSlam. While there are probably dozens, if not hundreds of moderate Muslims who can live in peace with their non Islamic neighbor, the very structure of the iSlamic religion, the Koran is anything but peaceful. To the devout adherents of iSlam a mosque at this place represents a breath taking victory of the west and its infidels.

The argument that Islam is a religion of peace is a myth carried not only by moderate Imams and Mullahs, and by pRogressives in America that have latched onto the "feel good" aura it provides them. It is likely few of them are aware of the history of Muhammad the creator of iSlam, or the requirements of the devout adherents to the faith of Muhammad.

The Koran says that non mUslins must convert or be killed, which is why Lying Lester argues that we must kill them first. And, in regards to that, Lying Lester proposes we start by bombing the Ground Zero mosque, which could be accomplished easily by sending some of our military jets to drop a few targeted missiles.

Now, for those of you who think this sounds extreme, I should point out that iSlam builds mosques on "conquered territory" as symbols of "victory" and "conquest" and iSlamic mosques are symbols of domination and centers of radicalization. And the fight over the not-yet-completed mosque is not just about religious tolerance, it is about recognizing the truth and the danger inherent in the supposed peaceful religion of iSlam and the evil symbolized by the false prophet Muhammad (piss be upon him).

Byline: This rational commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-125.

ISIS Must Be Stopped By Reinvading Iraq & Slaughtering All Muslims Who Refuse To Denounce The "Prophet" Mohammed

As the irrational, barbaric, savage, and murderous ISIS continues its quest to impose the will of the pRophet mOhammed on everyone another rational voice is heard... and it is, not surprisingly, not bArack oBama's. Obama, being a lazy Black man (and I use the term loosely) is only willing to take half measures.

Lying Lester knows what must be done, but does the US have the will to do it? Perhaps, but only if our next president is not a pansy lIberal pRogressive. The United States cannot go it alone in the fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, the extremist group known as ISIS whose ruthlessness and killing has dumbfounded and horrified the civilized world.

American airstrikes and other assistance from the United States have brought some measure of relief to religious minorities and others that ISIS has threatened. But defeating, or even substantially degrading, ISIS will require an organized, longer-term response involving a broad coalition of nations, including other mUslin countries, and addressing not only the military threat but political and religious issues.

So, will other mUslin countries join with the United States? They will, if they know what's good for them! So, I'm no neo con hawk, but this shit cancer ain't gonna go away by playing nice with the scum. They're ultimately going to come after us. Most likely with a dirty nuke.

Which is why Lying Lester says they are either with us, or they are against us. And why we might think about nuking them before they nuke us! Just like the lIberal pRogressives who are against us, Lying Lester says the mUslin scum must die. Or be rejected at the polls... that, in regards to the evil pRogressives.

Unfortunately voting out the lEftist mUslin terrorist sympathizers is the only way we can get rid of them. Fortunately killing foreigners is OK. So long as they are mUslin, at least. We've already killed a large number of them in our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and nobody gave a crap, so Lying Lester says why not kill many more?

So, while Lying Lester may have been against the Iraq war as started by former president George W. Bush, now he says we might have to go back in. And this time we KILL as many of the smelly, flea and lice infested mUslins as we possibly can. Unless they agree to denounce the evil false prophet mOhamed.

Then we MIGHT let them live. Or kill them anyway... if we drop a few nukes. Those pretty much kill anyone in the vicinity indiscriminately.

Byline: This excellent and non Islamophobic commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-123.

Lying Lester Says iSlam Is The rEligion of Pure Evil

That ISIS is threatening more beheadings of captured Americans if President Obama does not stop American operations in Iraq should take no one by surprise, ISIS being the scum of the earth.

Radical jihadists, adherents all to the "prophet" Muhammad and his "religion" called iSlam, will continue their barbarous assault on reason, liberty, Christianity, Judaism, Objectivism and any other belief system that does not conform to their treacherous beliefs and values (Objectivism being the last one I named, but the best one).

It remains to be seen what Obama will determine to do in response to this beheading of an innocent American journalist. Now may not be the time to show weakness, although I'm sure he will, given the fact that he is a lazy Black man.

As for we should do, Lying Lester thinks the mUslins should be given the opportunity to denounce/renounce their "prophet" and convert to some other rEligion (Lying Lester favors Objectivism). If not? Then Lying Lester says KILL THEM ALL!!! Perhaps some beheadings of our own might be one option we could (at least) consider?

In any case, the evil that is iSlam can no longer be tolerated. And saying so, by the way, is not bigoted, as one troll who is now banned from rAtional nAtion uSA suggested. Just ask my mUslin friends. I told them that mOhamed was an evil man, and they completely agreed with me.

Although they did say that, "Islam requires that mOhamed be acknowledged as Aslan's final prophet". To that I said "no". And then my mUslin friends said "you make a compelling argument, Lester. We'll do it". And then they broke from the mUslin church and formed a brand new sect of iSlam. A new sect that acknowledges that mOhamed was an evil man and a false prophet.

As for still using the Quran, which is the central religious text of iSlam and is believed by mUslins to have been revealed to mOhamed by Aslan, I said "that won't work, given that mOhamed wasn't a prophet and therefore he couldn't have had the text revealed to him by Aslan".

But I came up with a workable solution. I told my mUslin friends that they could pretend the text of the Quran was revealed (dictated by Aslan) to someone else. I mean - as with all rEligions - iSlam is completely pretend anyway... so just pretend someone else transcribed what the imaginary Aslan told him, her, or them?

I suggested Jesus, and my mUslin friends agreed, given that iSlam already views Jesus as a prophet. "Really?" I said. That iSlam views Jesus as a prophet is not something I knew. I would have thought that Jesus, being a good guy who did not rape and pillage, would be viewed by iSlam as an infidel.

But my mUslin friends said, "no, he's a prophet too. Or, he is a prophet while mOhamed is not. Not in our eyes anymore, anyway". And I told them that I was glad to hear that, as it meant they were serious about iSlam being a rEligion of peace. And, any mUslin that does not desire death should agree as well.

Agree by converting to this new form of iSlam that rejects the prophethood of mOhamed. They can convert to this new mOhamed-condemning sect of iSlam, or we (the sane rational world) will unleash such destruction on them they'll wish they were never born!

And I also suggested changing the name of their rEligion, so us sane folks would know who among the flea-and-lice-infested sand monkeys are the non-evil ones.

Christianity is named after the Christian's gOd, Christ... so what about Aslanity, named, of course, after the mUslim's lion-deity, Aslan?

Byline: This rational and non-iSlamophobic commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester: Man of Reason (AKA Lester Nation). Purveyor of Untruth. LLIN-122.