Octopus Is A Really Great Guy!

Octopus is one of the most brilliant and original theoriticians in all of human history and I know this because he's told me so, many times.

Actually, I don't like the guy because he impugns people's motivation and veracity constantly and it totally pissed me off when he said that I have an agenda. Octopus is a condescending boob who thinks that the sun rises and falls on his opinions and his delivery is always pretentious, pedantic, pontifical, etc.

He insults people (usually via some sort of sophomoric rhyme scheme), calls them liars, and mischaracterizes their views, and then he cries foul, when the targeted person responds in kind (maybe he feels that he's above criticism). Plus he's flagrantly orthodox and totally inept when it comes to consuming research, understanding nuance, and grasping the limitations of human knowledge.

The dude thinks that he already knows everything, takes himself way too seriously, and basically sounds like some pseudo-professorial blowhard 24/7. Other than that, he's a great guy.


Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-315.

I Am A Proud Racist

By "racist" I mean someone who recognizes the FACT that Whites are superior and that other races are inferior. And not only inferior, but criminally inclined and violent. Take a look at South Africa, for example. There White Farmers are being murdered by the violent jigaboos on an unprecedented scale.

Is this seriously what we want for the United States? A multicultural hell? I know I surely do not. This is why I support our excellent president's plan to greatly reduce the flow of immigrants from shithole nations. Yeah, when Trump called these countries "shitholes" the liberal media cried foul. But Trump told the truth. These countries (the ones inhabited by low-IQ violent jigs) ARE shitholes!

For this reason people say Trump is a "racist". But I am exactly the same sort of "racist". A person who thinks America should remain a majority White nation. Now, I am no "White Separatist", but if we could reverse course I'd be all for that. I refer to the demographic trend some refer to as the "browning of America".

That is why I am 100% behind our president and his desire for more immigration from White nations. There needs to be enough Whites to keep the violent jigs in their place. If, Ayn Rand forbid, this country ever becomes majority minority, we will be fucked. Just like in South Africa, where the murder rate of White farmers is through the roof, the jigs here will get a lot more violent. Mark my words! They can't help it because it is their nature.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of racism. LLIN-314.

Known Crackpot WD Never Wrote For This Blog

As you may have noticed, this blog has not been updated for some time. Fact is, I totally forgot I had it. After I lost all my commenters on my primary blog, Contra O'Reilly, I stopped checking in here. For the record, my assistant, Arnie Hanson had been writing all the commentaries here for awhile. Or "co-authoring" them. "Take my Contra O'Reilly posts and rewrite them for the LLIN blog" I told him.

Apparently he stopped updating this blog more than a year ago, even though he DID continue to collect paychecks from yours truly. Well, when I found out I fired his ass. Anyway, I was recently pursuing old posts at the blog Who's Your Daddy and ran across the following comments. Comments that caught my attention due to the factual inaccuracies they contain.

Rusty Shackelford: Poor RN, he got caught telling outright lies on three blogs I know of (there may be more) and got banned from commenting. I mean how much credence can one put into anything this guy says. He just cant seem to tell the truth. In fact WD, a half a lunatic got so tired of RN's lying he started a blog called Lying Lesters Irrational Nation... (10/13/2015 at 7:55pm). Rational Nation USA: I have been banned from there blogs. Two conservative intolerant weblogs that refuse to discuss issues truthfully, Contra O'Reilly and FreeThinke. The other is a progressive weblog that like the conservative weblogs refused to discuss issues truthfully. Being banned from those weblogs is of no consequence to me. Well, other than the satisfaction having exposed them for the intolerant frauds they are. As for WD, yup, he and I had profound differences and his LLIN was the result of that. Willis Hart is now the featured blogger on both that weblog renamed for him as well as Willis being featured on Oligarchic Stooge Talk. Keep on trucking in the sludge if your addled brain Shackelford. Keep on trucking. (10/13/2015 at 8:26pm). Rusty Shackelford: Poor RN... its always everyone other but his fault... "they refuse to discuss issues truthfully." What that means, they don't pay attention to his silliness. Wiil Hart and FT are head and shoulders smarter then poor Lester, he just has a difficult time admitting the truth. As for WD, a known crackpot, even he see's Lester for what he is... a liar of the first degree. (10/13/2015 at 9:36pm).

Let me be clear... WD (AKA Dervish Sanders) never wrote for this blog. Rational Nation, a former anarcho-capitalist classical-liberal worshiper of Ayn Rand who despised progressives TURNED Progressive Liberal, USED to write for this blog, but not WD. I did allow Sanders to comment here, but he absolutely never authored any posts.

BTW, Rational Nation (AKA Les Carpenter) started this blog. Then he invited me on as a contributor. Les foolishly made me an "administrator", so (after our falling out) I changed the passwords and kicked him off LLIN. Previously I wrote about how I took over this blog, authoring a bullshit story about how I purchased a controlling share of LLIN stock.

The truth is that I didn't buy LLIN, I stole it. Although my impression was that Les didn't care. After his transformation from anarcho-capitalist into Progressive Liberal he had no interest in writing for this blog any more. I think he would have either abandoned LLIN or deleted it (if I hadn't stole it).

In any case, I don't know about Rusty's claim that Les "got caught telling outright lies". I banned him, not for lying (per se), but for voicing agreement with that asshole Octopus.

Octopus wrote "Yup, RACIAL PROFILING is the same as RACISM, and Will-the-Shill has demonstrated both in this comment thread" and in response Les wrote "Of late he has drifted into more hard core fringe views. Unfortunate as it may be it is what it is".

Wow. Thanks for the impassioned defense, buddy. This comment, in a thread on RN's blog attached to a June 2015 post about the Charleston church shooting of 2/17/2015, was what tipped me off to the fact that RN had crossed over to the other side. That is when he officially became a Progressive Liberal (as far as I am concerned). Progressive Liberals (like Octopus) are immune to the facts concerning how violent Black people are.

Obviously Les is willing to tolerate accusations of "racism" from scumbags like Octopus regarding sane people (like myself) who point out the facts. It was not long after this assault (on Rational Nation's blog) that I banned him from further comment on Contra O'Reilly. So I hope that clears things up. Dervish Sanders never wrote for this blog. A number of people have, but WD was never an author.

Dennis Marks wrote 1 post. Arnie Hanson wrote 2 posts. Lyle Lester wrote 5 posts. Rational Nation (AKA "Lying Lester") wrote 145. NONE of those people are authors here any longer.

Dervish Sanders wrote zero posts. All the other commentaries were written by me. A total of 161 posts prior to the publication of this one. A post, BTW, which might be the last one published on this blog. Given the fact that I've lost interest in writing here. Contra O'Reilly remains active, I'd like to point out. I am not, however, accepting comments on Contra O'Reilly.

Mosey on over if you want to read my thoughts on politics, race relations, sports, hot chicks and lesbians, and a few other topics. But don't expect to be able to comment. Commenting is restricted to "team members" only. Also, I am the only "team member".

That WD is a crackpot is one fact that my old buddy Rusty Shackelford got correct, I'd like to note (in closing). Also (perhaps) a FULL lunatic (he trolled my blog for several years which angered me greatly) and was (partly) responsible for why I no longer accept comments. I just DO NOT want to hear from people who have (incorrect) opinions that differ from my own (correct) opinions.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of correct opinions. LLIN-313.

On CNN's Virtue Signaling Social Justice Warriors

I refer to CNN's post debate coverage Monday night (9/26/2016). Six people criticizing Trump (seven if you include the increasingly more and more difficult to stomach host, Anderson Cooper), two people defending the guy. So, no, not even remotely balanced. Though, yes, it was better than MSNBC, where even the Republican pundits - Steve Schmidt, Nicole Wallace - fall all over themselves in a rank effort to virtue-signal, be liked, etc.

They'll be sorry when Mr. Trump is in the White House. He'll have his revenge then, I'm sure. It's almost enough to make me root for Trump. But, yes, I'm still voting for Gary "what's Aleppo" Johnson.

Despite him having zero chance of being elected. I'm sticking to my principals and not voting for the lesser of two evils (I'm voting for the greater evil). Because I'm convinced that Gary Johnson would make the best president. In that he'd cater to the needs of the oligarchs the best.

BTW, why the hell wasn't Gary Johnson up on that debate stage? Trump is implying that (if he loses) that it will be because the election was rigged. But what about Gary Johnson? Is the election not rigged against him? But the elites knew that, if he had been allowed on the debate stage, he'd surely have mopped the floor with DJT and HRC.

And likely ended up our next president. But, given that he's getting no exposure? He can't win when people don't know who he is. Which is the point, of course. To suppress Gary's message of building up our oligarchs even more and crushing the poor and middle class even more than they are currently being crushed.

Although (to be completely honest, which in the past I haven't been) he cloaks that message in lies. Because the ignorant and stupid voters wouldn't like his real message (that they NEED to be crushed for the good of our oligarchs).

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-312.

My Favorite "Prussian Blue" Song?

It would have to be this one. A lyric from Aryan Man Awake says "and black masked men with guns come bashing down the doors"... which is something that I, as a White man, live in fear of.

Extreme fear that gives me the night sweats. So, while I don't own a gun, I'm not about to place a sign in my yard saying so. That would be an invitation for the black masked men to come bashing down my door. Darkies with names like Mookie, Ray-Ray, Dre and Slice. They, instead of working hard and earning what they have, want to steal from me.

Anyway, the Prussian Blue gals nail it in this song. Although I think someone else likely wrote the lyrics. In fact, according to the Prussian Blue Wikipedia page the sisters (fraternal twins born on 6/30/1992) they're now "laid-back liberals celebrating the joys of ethnic diversity".

What a shame. Although they apparently still believe that the Holocaust was exaggerated. Which, as I've pointed out on my other blog (Contra O'Reilly) is absolutely a fact (that Jew whiners inflate the numbers).

But there are no "joys" to ethnic diversity. Unless you think being attacked by a violent Black thug is "enjoyable". Which I do not. Still a great song though.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of racism. LLIN-311.

On The Fact That Most Blacks Are Incredibly Stupid (And YES, It's A Fact)

Did you know that the Left has the tendency to remove any and all moral agency from Black people? Probably not, I'd bet. But, to me, this is quite possibly the most insidious form of racism that exists! Why? Because the Left does it. Or so I say, regardless of whether or not it's true.

The Left would likely counter that it's the Right that has a tendency to remove any and all moral agency from the wealthy and corporations. Examples being the "affluenza" kid and Corporate killers getting off with mere fines (and with nobody getting jail time. Even when people are killed).

In any case, I cannot for the life of me understand why 80 to 90% of black people (those whose names aren't Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, John McWhorter, Robert Woodson, Shelby Steele, etc.) continue to put up with it. Seriously. They should come over to the Right where corporate criminals and rich people get all the breaks. The people who deserve them.

The only explanation I can come up with this that Blacks are incredibly stupid. Genetically, I mean. Also very much like little children (albeit incredibly violent and criminally inclined children). Explaining why the Left treats them like little children. But children can't grow up unless they're show that they are responsible for their actions!

In that they see "that 12–13% of the American population is African-American, but they make up 35% of jail inmates, and 37% of prison inmates of the 2.2 million male inmates as of 2014". They're getting off easy, in other words. NOT being held accountable for their actions. Otherwise that percentage would be much higher.

By the way, I previously mentioned Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, John McWhorter, Robert Woodson, and Shelby Steele... these are African Americans that are among the few good ones. The majority of the Blacks being violent and criminally inclined imbeciles. Sorry, but yes.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-310.

Socialists Are Bigoted Against Rich People

Bet you didn't know that the Democratic Socialists of America website states that "the workers who are affected by economic institutions should own and control them". Right. Not only do I disagree, but I say "no way". No FUCKING way!

Employees should absolutely NOT own the companies where they work! I mean, we NEED someone at the top being paid an exorbitant salary and collecting "bonuses" even when the company loses money. Because it's the American way.

And so the difference between democratic socialism (where apparently if I owned a business that did well enough to employ a couple of hundred people, I wouldn't any longer be allowed to call the shots and would instead be at the mercy of those who sweep the floors and plow the driveways) and regular socialism... is what again?

Fucking commies would force me to sell my business? Or just take it from me? No, the DSA website doesn't say that. I just assume. The looting of the wealthy class being something socialists excel at. I mean, they SURELY could not be talking about converting businesses to co-ops legally by buying them.

I, for one, wouldn't sell. Not that I own a business. But if did and wanted to retire (and also didn't have any kids I wanted to leave it to) and was made a generous offer by my employees? I'd tell them to go to hell. I'd sell to someone offering less (a lot less) before I'd sell to employees. Companies should be controlled by the wealthy, not working class peons.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-309.

On "Black Studies" Degrees

The complete and unabridged list of possible career paths for Black Studies graduates? Professional agitator/victim, fast food worker. And that's it.

Although, to be honest (something I usually try to avoid), according to Ohio State University, there are jobs someone with a Bachelor of Arts in African American and African Studies can get. Some examples they give include Megan L. Comfort, who is a Senior Research Sociologist at the Urban Health Program at RTI International. She's also an Adjunct Asst Professor of Medicine at UCSF.

As well as others (they've got a list of "Notable AAAS Majors" on their website). But I STILL say the majority of the darkies who "earn" this worthless degree end up in one of the careers I noted.

A degree that, according to Wikipedia, is now known as "Africoon Studies". Oops, I mean "Africana studies", African-American Studies or Afrocoonology.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-308.

A Message For That Fascist Socialist Asshole Bernie Sanders

Your sandwich is up, dude (looks like a Filet-O-Fish). Wrap, please. And then, yes, either go to school or learn a trade so that you can legitimately make $15 an hour (resign from Congress, in other words). You mother-fucker.

I've heard Bernie has a lot of credit card debt and just bought a real expensive house, so he can't retire. But that's what socialism is all about... living on debt. And, at 74, this dumbass should have built up a sizable nest egg. Instead he OWES money?

Thank Ayn Rand this parasite didn't get the nomination. Although I don't know if he would have won or not. Given that many of his fellow losers voted for him because they wanted all that free stuff he was promising. Looted from Makers such as myself. So he might have had a shot.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-307.

On That Black Asshole Marc Lamont Hill

Regarding this Black asshole Marc Lamont Hill? In his paranoiac and race-baiting universe, none of his fellow darkies can be racist because negroes don't have a sufficient amount of political power. But I say this minstrel is insane.

While, yes, Blacks on average have less political power than Whites, it's also fair to point out that there are a lot of Blacks (the President, the Attorney General, the National Security Advisor, the Congressional Black Caucus, the Secretary of Homeland Security, hundreds of big city mayors, etc., etc.) who have a hell of a have a lot more political power than many Whites (in Appalachia, say).

Sure, Barack Obama is leaving office soon and is going to be replaced by another White person, and, as far as darkies in Congress goes, it's 8.78 percent Black, while the nation is 13.2 percent darkie. That would be 45 out of 435 in the House (10.34 percent) and 2 out of 100 in the Senate (2 percent). (Source).

Also, I really don't give a crap that Lamont Hill was surely referring to the fact that your average Black citizen, despite so Many Africoon Americans having political power, are still targeted by the GOP with the voter ID laws. As the Washington Post points out the "courts are finally pointing out the racism behind voter ID laws.

Your average Progressive dipshit might point to the fact that Right-wing militia groups increased significantly under Obama, and that the rise of Trump is due to the pent up racial hatred of his base over the last 8 years, and that he won the primaries by dog barking (not whistling) to them. Proof that racism is very much a problem today.

But I'd point out that's all bullshit. Also, that racism is an irrational system of BELIEFS that doesn't necessarily require political power anyway. I mean, I know that this asshole thinks exclusively in dichotomies and all but this is ludicrous. Especially given the fact that Blacks are the REAL racists.

P.S. And need I also remind you that there doesn't exist a strong correlation between political power and economic attainment (the Chinese in Malaysia, the USA, and other countries, for example, have little political power and yet they continue to kick educational and economic butt) and that maybe a lot of these pro-blacks are climbing up the wrong mountain to begin with? Just throwing it out there that the real reason for a lack of Black prosperity is the fact that they're so damn lazy.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-306.

Will That Lying Piece Of Shit Lawyer, Miss Hillary, Finally Be Put Behind Bars Where She Belongs?

If there's a deity, maybe. The fact that she lied to the families of the Benghazi victims was the final straw for me. Sure, that's a load of bullpucky, but STILL, it was the final straw for me. Not the Rightwing lying re "she lied to the families of the Benghazi victims", but the Leftist media calling out that lie. Fuck them.

PoltiFact: This allegation that Clinton lied to victims' families refers to events right after the 9/11/2012, attack on a US diplomatic compound in Benghazi Libya. 3 days after the attacks, President Barack Obama, Clinton and others met with the families of the four victims, gathering at Joint Base Andrews to receive the victims' remains. [Rightwingers allege] that at this meeting, Clinton told the families a story about the attacks that she knew at the time to be false. This talking point gets right at the heart of the deep partisan divide over Benghazi and Clinton's role, and readers have asked us for clarity. But the lack of hard evidence makes it impossible to know what really happened between Clinton and these families. No one recorded these brief meetings behind closed doors. Family members and Clinton disagree on what was said. Especially given the emotional setting, memories - both Clinton's and the families' - might be fuzzy. Patricia Smith, mother of information officer Sean Smith [said HRC told her a video was to blame, as did] Charles Woods, father of CIA operative Tyrone Woods... Some family members don't remember any discussion of a video. Jan Stevens, father of Ambassador Chris Stevens, told PolitiFact that the first time he heard anything about a video was when the Washington Post Fact Checker called him with a similar question. He confirmed that he heard "nothing whatsoever" about a video from Clinton but declined to comment further. Tyrone Woods' mother, Cheryl Bennett, told PolitiFact that when she spoke with Clinton, she "never heard the word video mentioned. That's just a fact". Bennett, who is estranged from Charles Woods, said the motivation behind the attack didn't come up in her brief interaction with Clinton. Speaking with CNN's Anderson Cooper in October 2015, Kate Quigley, sister of CIA operative Glen Doherty, said Clinton mentioned protests but not a video. Barbara Doherty, Glen Doherty's mother, didn't recall talking with Clinton about a video and said she remembered Clinton as being sincere and crying, according to the Washington Post. Clinton, for her part, flatly denies saying anything about the film in her one-on-one with the families. (What did Hillary Clinton tell the families of people who lost their lives in Benghazi? by Lauren Carroll, 2/9/2016).

More people say HRC never mentioned that fucking video (the Innocence of Muslims). But, you know what? I'm going to believe what I want to believe. Which is that HRC lied. Even though she didn't. Just like I'm going to keep believing that Lara Logan's reporting on what Benghazi "eyewitness" Morgan Jones proves that IT'S NOT a fake scandal... this despite the fact that Logan herself said "we were wrong... and we apologize to our viewers".

Fact is, I'm quite proud of my cognitive dissonance. How the hell else do you think I could remain a Libertarian? Heck, I've even gone further down the Libertarian rabbit hole since I started this blog, this KNOWING that Gary Johnson is a despicable colossal liar.

But Gary HAS to lie. Because today's voters only go for the candidate that offers them the most free stuff. So, when Gary says that, under a Johnson presidency "we can still still create a safety net [and] nobody goes without", OF COURSE he's TOTALLY BSing. But he HAS to! It's what they call the "good lie". And I commend Johnson for lying about such things.

Unlike HRC. She lies by telling her supporters what they want to hear. But Johnson isn't lying to his supporters, he's lying to those who want free stuff. His genuine supporters (people like me), know the REAL agenda is to get rid of the safety net. Specifically so the parasites will "do without". And die off. Believe me, America will be better without the moochers.

Anyway, will HRC go to prison like Julia Assange of WikiLeaks says? Probably not. But maybe. And that would surely be a great day. As then Gary Johnson would be the only alternative. And perhaps THEN he'd be viable. Something he currently is not. Sadly. Even my cognitive dissonance (massive as it is) can't convince me that Gary has a shot at getting elected POTUS. Unless something unprecedented occurs (like HRC getting arrested). Let's just say my fingers are crossed.

And who wants a chick president anyway? Not me, that's for sure.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of unfacts. LLIN-305.

But, Benghazi! Also, Mike Brown's Life Did Not Matter

Did you see the kanipshin thrown by those guttersnipes on MSNBC (Matthews, MadDUH, etc.) when Pat Smith, the deluded Mother of Sean Smith (one of the victims of the Benghazi Attacks), was allowed to speak at the RNC? She's a Conservative who's bought into the Conservative BS that says Hillary Clinton is personally and wholly responsible for her son's death.

This, despite the fact that HRC has been cleared by multiple REPUBLICAN investigations. You better believe it that, if there had been something, ANYTHING, that could have been found that would pin the whole thing on Hillary, Congressional Republicans would have found it. Instead, bupkis.

But Sean Smith's mother (clearly a Conservative) desperately wants someone to blame and thus is buying their bullshit. Hillary Clinton is directly and solely responsible for this grief stricken and addled woman's mind, and the degenerates that put her on stage clearly took advantage of this poor woman.

Re this tactic, I say BRAVO! I also want to add (re the MSNBC guttersnipes), these of course are the same individuals who trotted out the 9/11 widows to lambaste Bush and who seemingly don't have a problem with the mother of Michael Brown (a thug who robbed a convenient store and who later assaulted a cop) talking smack at the DNC. Just for the record here.

BTW (also just for the record) Michael Brown absolutely deserved an instant death penalty for what he did! Yeah, Brown was running away, so (at that point) the cop could have retreated to his vehicle and called for backup, or (after he started shooting) stopped shooting instead of unloading his weapon (believing, apparently that he was dealing with a superhuman who couldn't be stopped except by ALL of his bullets).

Instead he shot Brown dead. The head shot being the bullet that ended his life. Justifiably. Because, at least when it comes to unarmed Blacks, the cops SHOULD administer an instant death penalty! Like I said previously, the cops aren't killing ENOUGH Black men. So, yeah, whenever they get the opportunity, law enforcement should take the opportunity to kill Blacks.

Even is they need to stretch the truth... "he went for my gun" or "he was reaching for his waistband and I thought he had a gun". Neither of those statements will ever be able to be disproven, which is why they're so frequently utilized as an excuse to PUT BLACKS DOWN! Which I FULLY support.

BTW, in regards to Mike Brown's mom... fuck her! Stupid bitch raised a THUG with no respect for his White superiors (nor Asian superiors). All I can say is thank goodness this violent animal is in the grave.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of racism. LLIN-304.