On Why I Might Vote Donald Trump For President

Steve Hayes recently referred to the Trump candidacy as a "Clown Show", to which I say "maybe". But do I need to remind you that Mr. Hayes currently scrimmages with the "Weekly Standard", a neocon rag that gives both cover and credence to some of the most buffoonish and despicable war-mongers inside the beltway (William Kristol, Fred Barnes, Charles Krauthammer, etc.)?

Yes, Trump has his flaws - NO QUESTION. But at least he doesn't have blood rupturing from his typewriter, for Christ. And, at least he's not a Bible thumper like all of the other Republican hopefuls (to some degree). Or a liar like Hillary (who said Benghazi was the result of some YouTube video when she knew it was a terrorist attack). Or a fucking socialist cocksucker (for christ!) like Bernie Sanders.

I mean, if I knew my vote for Gary Johnson would make the difference between Trump winning or losing my state? Yeah, then I think I might just pull the lever for Trump, god help me. Say what you want about Vladimir Putin, but at least the fellow has a coherent plan when it comes to Syria. And Trump is smart enough to let him take the lead there. When your enemies are slaughtering each other, I say let them.

And I must also give Trump props for his bitch slapping of that loathsome freakazoid Rosie O'Donnell. You know, I used to start fights between kindergarteners when I was a 6th grader (a 12 year-old Don King) and, so, yeah, I can kind of relate.

Anyway, while it's doubtful that I'd vote for Trump... I just might. Aside from Rand Paul, Trump is the only Republican candidate who doesn't appear hell-bent on a second cold war. Also, if the choice was Trump or Sanders, you can bet your ass I'd vote Trump given the fact that he acknowledges the fact that American workers are overpaid (and that we need to do away with the minimum wage).

Have you heard that the world's richest 62 people have as much wealth as the other half of world's population? Yeah, it's good news that inequality has become that great. So, question is... do we want to go backwards by electing a Socialist like Sanders? Or even a conservative Democrat like Hillary (who's also running on handing out free stuff)? Hell no!

Byline: This hate-filled commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of hate blogging. LLIN-197.

On The Fact That Most Porch Monkeys Are Stupid As Well As Lazy

Did you know that (according to Economist, Roland Fryer) when you control for skill levels, the wage differential between blacks and Whites decreases by almost 98%? And it isn't just the wage gap. The unemployment differential decreases by 53% while the welfare, teen pregnancy, and incarceration differentials decrease by 84%, 84%, and 79% respectively.

This of course isn't to assert that there isn't some discrimination. They're clearly is. I mean, most blacks are CLEARLY lazy and stupid, but there are good ones. Good ones willing to point out the truth about they're violent, lazy and stupid brethren. The rare intelligent and non-lazy African American like Roland Fryer.

Anyway (based upon these statistics), it's also safe to say that we may have been barking up the wrong tree by focusing so much on ineffective (and counterproductive) measures such as affirmative action and not enough on getting kids 14 and under a better educational start. Although, given the fact that violence, stupidity and laziness is likely a genetic thing with the blacks this won't help many of them. But the up and coming Fryers? Yeah, it could help them, and that would obviously be a good thing.

BTW, I'm positive that more of these good blacks could rise to the top if only we got rid of the Democrat Regressive programs that encourage laziness in blacks. It's called welfare dependency - look into it folks.

And yes, it might be true "that conservatives play up racial resentments to undermine the welfare state... [explaining why] a state with large amounts of racism [spends less on assistance to needy families]". And it might also be true that "racial considerations are the single most important factor shaping whites' views of welfare".

But to that I say, so what? If you want to insist that someone who recognizes the truth about blacks being inherently lazy is racist, then I say go ahead and call me racist. I mean, this obviously explains the wage gap, the unemployment differential, the larger numbers of black teens getting pregnant, and the large numbers of blacks being incarcerated. blacks are simply stupid and lazy. Far more of them are stupid and lazy than Whites (percentage wise), that's for sure.

Byline: This highly insightful commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of pointing out the truth about the lazy & stupid blacks. LLIN-196.

Bernie Sanders Is A Socialist For Christ! Also a Fucking Moron

Did you know that the Heritage Foundation and Wall Street Journal Rank Denmark (Switzerland and Canada, too) ahead of the United States on their Index of Economic Freedom? That fucking cocksucker Bernie Sanders doesn't know that, obviously. This is the coward who didn't have the guts to say that all fucking lives matter during the Democratic debate.

Denmark, Switzerland and Canada are countries that have universal healthcare and where the ratio of CEO/worker pay is dramatically lesser. They also have significantly higher minimum wages. In the US our lowest paid workers earn $7.25 an hour. However, in Canada they earn $12.50 per hour, in Switzerland 14-28, and in Denmark 21. No doubt Bernie wants to emulate them in that regard.

However, while those countries have high individual tax rates, they also have much less regulation (making it much easier to start and manage a company) and a lower corporate tax rate. On that front I bet that Bernie would strongly disagree with Denmark, Switzerland and Canada. I feel it in my gut that Bernie wants to bring even MORE profit-lowering regulations to the US... in order to slightly lower profits for big businesses. Bernie knows that close to 1/3rd of new jobs are being created by big businesses, and he wants to eliminate their ability to hire people for slave wages. Because he hates wealthy employers so much.

This is why scoundrels like Sanders want the minimum wage to be so high. These socialist dumbshits want businesses to be forced to fire people simply because they can't afford to pay them a living wage (Outrageous!). Bernie Sanders is a socialist moron! Yes, in Denmark, Switzerland and Canada the minimum wage is a lot higher, but we can't have a high minimum wage in the United States because the US-based plutocrats demand it!

Maybe if our government were to cut them some slack in the regulation department they'd be open to a higher minimum wage? Absolutely not. The US plutocrats desire both deregulation and low low wages. This is because the US is exceptional. Our plutocrats are exception and deserve to be treated thusly.

Byline: This awesome commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of bowing down to our oligarchs. LLIN-195.

Thomas Jefferson, When Saying "All Men Are Created Equal" REALLY Meant All Men Are NOT Equal

Do you think that Thomas Jefferson meant (when he said) "All Men Are Created Equal" that we're all clones with identical abilities, aptitudes, etc., and that an equality of outcome between various groups could ever be secured? Of course not. He realized that some of us (Willis Hart, for example) are far smarter and thus far more likely to achieve great things than the dummies.

The dummies mostly being black (think Mookie and Ray-Ray). Thomas Sowell, one of the RARE intelligent blacks, has pointed out on numerous occasions that there has NEVER been a society in which the composite ethnic groups have achieved at the same rate. So, yes, an affirmative action program whose goal it is to raise up the dummy blacks (the vast majority of them) is doomed to fail.

Which isn't to say there are not a lot of White dummies, btw. A prime example being wd. He is White and also a HUGE dummy. But he is also a far left Progressive, so that explains that. Progressives being some of the dumbest people on the plant.

Byline: This highly intelligent commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of smartness. LLIN-194.

On The Fact That The Founders Hated Democracy Because It Doesn't Favor The Wealthy

Yes, it is a fact that the U.S. Constitution is largely an anti-majoritarian document. The separation of powers, two senators per state regardless of population, presidential veto power, the Electoral College, limited enumerated powers for the Federal Government, etc. That, and it never once mentions the term, Democracy. Ditto, the Declaration of Independence.

America's founders were apparently smart enough to know that unchecked democratic rule invariably leads to tyranny, mob-rule, and socialism. By which I mean that the poor and middle class vote for wealth redistribution (theft from their betters).

Yes, it's true that in countries like Switzerland Iceland, Denmark, Norway, Canada, Finland, the Netherlands, and Sweden democratic socialism produces happiness (the people in these countries being the happiest according to the world happiness report).

But the tradeoff is that, instead of there being a handful of super-wealthy people, we only have a lot of moderately rich folks. A tradeoff that isn't worth it in my opinion, which is why I support oligarchy. An oligarchic form of government is superior in terms of protecting the rights of the wealthy minority and the rights of the wealthy individual.

Unfortunately (and as Jefferson predicted), the power of the central government (state government as well) has grown so exponentially and rapidly (the Constitution now being little more than window dressing) over the past two centuries plus these same founders would probably slit their wrists due to all the plundering of superior people (superiority that allows some to become wealthy). Frankly I couldn't blame 'em. Really.

Byline: This superior was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of wealth worshiping. LLIN-193.

Black Intelligence Not Sufficient To Run A Country (South Africa Being Proof Positive That The Majority Of Spear Chuckers Are Dim Bulbs)

Did you know that (according to Time Magazine opinion writer, Simon Robinson) Black unemployment in South Africa skyrocketed 63% (from 19% all the way to 31%) from 1994 to 2003?

In regards to this I ask, is this more of Saint Nelson's legacy? Obviously it's proof that Whites are superior to Blacks. Duh.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of Unfacts. LLIN-192.

Fucking Barbarian Ragheads Murder Each Other & Nobody Gives A Shit (As They Should Not)

Did you know that it's a fact that Hamas murdered scores of Fatah opposition in 2007 after the elections there (such that they were) and followed that up with summary executions of suspected traitors? (Hamas Executions Against Palestinians Protesting War in Gaza).

Yeah, nobody gives a flying fuck 'cause it was ragheads killing ragheads without an Israeli in sight. Haven't you figured this out yet? Fucking Leftists only care about ragheads dying when it's Israelis doing the killing.

Me, I cheer every raghead death I hear of. Whether it's an Israeli doing the killing, or whether these terrorist barbarians are murdering each other. The only good raghead is a dead raghead in my book.

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of Islamophobia. LLIN-191.

Colonialism Helped Ignorant Savages Achieve Success (Ungrateful Darkies Should Be Thanking The White Man Instead of Demonizing Him!)

In regards to the claim made by Marxist academics and others that colonial Britain "plundered" Africa? I say this claim is objectively bullshit. As Harrison, Huntington, Mercer, and others have pointed out, practically the entire infrastructure of Africa (as it pertains to agriculture, mining, commerce, finance, industry, etc) was built by colonial powers (most of Sub-Saharan Africa didn't even possess the wheel prior to European contact) with the lion-share of that being built by THE BRITISH!!

And, while, yes, the period of colonization itself was often less than ideal, even that period has been characterized by no less than Moeletsi Mbeki (brother of former South African President, Thabo Mbeki) as better than what exists today. So, yeah, maybe we all need to stop beating ourselves up and realize that the troubles in Africa have a hell of a lot more to do with tribalism, racism, horrible economic models and the inferiority of the Negro race - as well as a variety of repressive regimes that would have made Joe Stalin proud and much less to do with colonialism. Just a thought, folks.

Byline: This truthful commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of telling it like it is. LLIN-190.

White Power!

Did you know that it's a fact that former colonies such as Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan are doing phenomenally well while countries Such as Afghanistan, Liberia, Tibet, and Nepal which were never colonized are still performing poorly?

The fact of the matter is that those areas of Asia and Africa that had the most European contact are doing the best and those that aren't are doing poorly because of corruption, repression, and socialism. Obviously the reason for this is that White people are superior. When the colonizers went in they laid the groundwork for success that even incompetent minorities can't fuck with. Period, end of report.

Byline: This superior (because it was written by a White guy) commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of telling it like it is. LLIN-189.

On The Fact That Most Porch Monkeys Are So Stupid

Did you know that East-Asian-Americans and Ashkenazi Jews continue to dominate White Gentiles in professions and academic areas involving mathematics? Is this a systematic bias against Whites? Or a cultural difference? And if it's a cultural difference, couldn't the same be said regarding Blacks and the way that they lag behind not just Whites and Asians but African immigrants, too?

I'm just asking here, folks (as a part of the President's conversation on race, let's say). My own hypothesis is that American Blacks have grown lazy and stupid due to Progressive entitlement programs. Why would Mookie And Ray-Ray work for anything or use the power of their minds to achieve when they can just have everything handed to them?

Byline: This highly insightful commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of strawmen. LLIN-188.

On Why The Presidency Is Better Served When There Is No First Lady

Over on my other blog, Contra O'Reilly I made a funny when I asked who the greatest First Lady ever was... and answered that for me, it's a tie between Mrs. Buchanan and Mrs. Jefferson.

The joke being the fact that Martha Jefferson died 12 years before husband Thomas became president and that James Buchanan was a confirmed bachelor. Ha ha ha ha. Good one, right?

In any case, the take away here is that the best First Lady is NO First Lady. Which is why I say the position should be eliminated. At the least Congress should pass some legislation that says a First Lady can do nothing. I mean, this is NOT an elected position, right? So why the hell is the First Lady able to do anything, let alone EXPECTED to do things?

Do we really need some dumb bitch telling our kids that they should "just say no" to drugs or that they should exercise more? What a colossal waste of taxpayer money, I say! Leave the child-rearing to the parents and cut out the nanny state BS. Or "mommy state" (when it comes to the First ladies, apparently).

Presidenting should be for men only and the ladies should be prevented from doing anything when their husbands are the ones elected. But that's just my opinion. Call me old fashioned if you like.

Another reason (as if one were needed) not to vote for that liar Hillary!

Byline: This commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Purveyor of being old fashioned. LLIN-187.

On Why I Believe Walmart Should Decuple The Salary Of Their CEO (Multiply It By Ten)

It's due to the fact that the CEO of Walmart could Work for NOTHING and even if you distributed his entire forfeited salary to the employees it would only come out to about $15 per person PER YEAR.

So why not give the dude a raise? Even if Walmart were to decuple his salary that would only work out to about $150 per employee per year. Surely the skinflint owners of Walmart (The Billionaire children of Sam Walton) can afford to bump up their CEO's salary by a factor of ten? Heck, they could multiply his salary by a thousand and it wouldn't be a big deal.

That's why I don't get too upset about this whole "CEO to worker ratio growing" talking point (the fact that it's an essentially symbolic issue, lacks perspective, etc.) and would much prefer a more substantive analysis concerning why many of our CEOs are so woefully underpaid.

Byline: This insightful commentary was authored by Willis "I Love Strawmen" Hart. Champion of our underpaid CEOs. LLIN-186.